Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 193–200 | Cite as

Assessing the combined effect of extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure and oxidative stress on LINE-1 promoter methylation in human neural cells

  • Gianfranco Giorgi
  • Chiara Pirazzini
  • Maria Giulia Bacalini
  • Cristina Giuliani
  • Paolo Garagnani
  • Miriam Capri
  • Ferdinando Bersani
  • Brunella Del Re
Original Article

Abstract

Extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) have been classified as “possibly carcinogenic”, but their genotoxic effects are still unclear. Recent findings indicate that epigenetic mechanisms contribute to the genome dysfunction and it is well known that they are affected by environmental factors. To our knowledge, to date the question of whether exposure to ELF-MF can influence epigenetic modifications has been poorly addressed. In this paper, we investigated whether exposure to ELF-MF alone and in combination with oxidative stress (OS) can affect DNA methylation, which is one of the most often studied epigenetic modification. To this end, we analyzed the DNA methylation levels of the 5′untranslated region (5′UTR) of long interspersed nuclear element-1s (LINE-1 or L1), which are commonly used to evaluate the global genome methylation level. Human neural cells (BE(2)C) were exposed for 24 and 48 h to extremely low frequency pulsed magnetic field (PMF; 50 Hz, 1 mT) in combination with OS. The methylation levels of CpGs located in L1 5′UTR region were measured by MassARRAY EpiTYPER. The results indicate that exposures to the single agents PMF and OS induced weak decreases and increases of DNA methylation levels at different CpGs. However, the combined exposure to PMF and OS lead to significant decrease of DNA methylation levels at different CpG sites. Most of the changes were transient, suggesting that cells can restore homeostatic DNA methylation patterns. The results are discussed and future research directions outlined.

Keywords

DNA methylation Epigenetics LINE-1 Retrotransposition Extremely low frequency magnetic field Oxidative stress 

References

  1. Bacalini MG, Friso S, Olivieri F, Pirazzini C, Giuliani C, Capri M, Santoro A, Franceschi C, Garagnani P (2014) Present and future of anti-ageing epigenetic diets. Mech Ageing Dev 136–137:101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belan E (2013) LINEs of evidence: noncanonical DNA replication as an epigenetic determinant. Biol Direct 8:22. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-8-22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biedler JL, Roffler-Tarlov S, Schachner M, Freedman LS (1978) Multiple neurotransmitter synthesis by human neuroblastoma cell lines and clones. Cancer Res 38:3751–3757Google Scholar
  4. Bollati V, Baccarelli A, Hou L, Bonzini M, Fustinoni S, Cavallo D, Byun HM, Jiang J, Marinelli B, Pesatori AC, Bertazzi PA, Yang AS (2007) Changes in DNA methylation patterns in subjects exposed to low-dose benzene. Cancer Res 67:876–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourc’his D, Bestor TH (2004) Meiotic catastrophe and retrotransposon reactivation in male germ cells lacking Dnmt3L. Nature 431:96–99ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chappell G, Pogribny IP, Guyton KZ, Rusyn I (2016) Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: a systematic literature review. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 768:27–45. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruickshanks HA, Vafadar-Isfahani N, Dunican DS, Lee A, Sproul D, Lund JN, Meehan RR, Tufarelli C (2013) Expression of a large LINE-1-driven antisense RNA is linked to epigenetic silencing of the metastasis suppressor gene TFPI-2 in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 41:6857–6869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Prins S, Koppen G, Jacobs G, Dons E, Van de Mieroop E, Nelen V, Fierens F, IntPanis L, De Boever P, Cox B, Nawrot TS, Schoeters G (2013) Influence of ambient air pollution on global DNA methylation in healthy adults: a seasonal follow-up. Environ Int 59:418–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Del Re B, Giorgi G (2013) Cell-host, LINE and environment: three players in search of a balance. Mob Genet Elem 3:1–4e24040. doi:10.4161/mge.24040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Del Re B, Marcantonio P, Gavoçi E, Bersani F, Giorgi G (2012) Assessing LINE-1 retrotransposition activity in neuroblastoma cells exposed to extremely low-frequency pulsed magnetic fields. Mutat Res 749(1–2):76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denli AM, Narvaiza I, Kerman B, Pena M, Benner C, Marchetto MC, Diedrich JK, Aslanian A, Ma J, Moresco JJ, Moore L, Hunter T, Saghatelian A, Gage FH (2015) Primate-specific ORF0 contributes to retrotransposon-mediated diversity. Cell 163:583–593. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Loreto S, Falone S, Caracciolo V, Sebastiani P, D’Alessandro A et al (2009) Fifty hertz extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure elicits redox and trophic response in rat-cortical neurons. J Cell Physiol 219:334–343. doi:10.1002/jcp.21674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flores KB, Wolschin F, Amdam GV (2013) The role of methylation of DNA in environmental adaptation. Integr Comp Biol 53:359–372. doi:10.1093/icb/ict019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giorgi G, Marcantonio P, Del Re B (2011) LINE-1 retrotransposition in human neuroblastoma cells is affected by oxidative stress. Cell Tissue Res 346:383–391. doi:10.1007/s00441-011-1289-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giorgi G, Lecciso M, Capri M, Lukas Yani S, Virelli A, Bersani F, Del Re B (2014) An evaluation of genotoxicity in human neuronal-type cells subjected to oxidative stress under an extremely low frequency pulsed magnetic field. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 775–776:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giuliani C, Bacalini MG, Sazzini M, Pirazzini C, Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Luiselli D (2015) The epigenetic side of human adaptation: hypotheses, evidences and theories. Ann Hum Biol 42:1–9. doi:10.3109/03014460.2014.961960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2002) Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 80:1–395Google Scholar
  18. Iskow RC, McCabe MT, Mills RE, Torene S, Pittard WS, Neuwald AF, Van Meir EG, Vertino PM, Devine SE (2010) Natural mutagenesis of human genomes by endogenous retrotransposons. Cell 141:1253–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jella KK, Rani S, O’Driscoll L, McClean B, Byrne HJ, Lyng FM (2014) Exosomes are involved in mediating radiation induced bystander signaling in human keratinocyte cells. Radiat Res 181:138–145. doi:10.1667/RR13337.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jurkowska RZ, Jurkowski TP, Jeltsch A (2011) Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases. Chembiochem 12:206–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klironomos FD, Berg J, Collins S (2013) How epigenetic mutations can affect genetic evolution: model and mechanism. Bioessays 35:571–578. doi:10.1002/bies.201200169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kloypan C, Srisa-art M, Mutirangura A, Boonla C (2015) LINE-1 hypomethylation induced by reactive oxygen species is mediated via depletion of S-adenosylmethionine. Cell Biochem Funct 33:375–385. doi:10.1002/cbf.3124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klutstein M, Nejman D, Greenfield R, Cedar H (2016) DNA methylation in cancer and aging. Cancer Res 76:3446–3450. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kryston TB, Georgiev AB, Pissis P, Georgakilas AG (2011) Role of oxidative stress and DNA damage in human carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 711:193–201. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar A, Rai PS, Upadhya R, Vishwanatha KS, K (2011) γ-radiation induces cellular sensitivity and aberrant methylation in human tumor cell lines. Int J Radiat Biol 87:1086–1096. doi:10.3109/09553002.2011.605417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li P, McLaughlin J, Infante-Rivard C (2009) Maternal occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and the risk of brain cancer in the offspring. Cancer Causes Control 20:945–955. doi:10.1007/s10552-009-9311-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Z, Doho G, Zheng X, Jella KK, Li S, Wang Y, Dynan WS (2015) Co-culturing with high-charge and energy particle irradiated cells Increases mutagenic joining of enzymatically induced DNA double-strand breaks in nonirradiated Cells. Radiat Res 184:249–258. doi:10.1667/RR14092.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu F, Killian JK, Yang M, Walker RL, Hong JA, Zhang M, Davis S, Zhang Y, Hussain M, Xi S, Rao M, Meltzer PA, Schrump DS (2010) Epigenomic alterations and gene expression profiles in respiratory epithelia exposed to cigarette smoke condensate. Oncogene 29(25):3650–3664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Liu WB, Liu KJ, Ao L, Zhong JL, Cao J, Liu JY (2015) Effect of 50 Hz extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on the DNA methylation and DNA methyltransferases in mouse spermatocyte-derived cell line GC-2. Biomed Res Int 2015:237183. doi:10.1155/2015/237183 Google Scholar
  30. Manikonda PK, Rajendra P, Devendranath D, Gunasekaran B, Channakeshava, Aradhya SR, Sashidhar RB, Subramanyam C (2014) Extremely low frequency magnetic fields induce oxidative stress in rat brain. Gen Physiol Biophys 33:81–90. doi:10.4149/gpb_2013059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marcantonio P, Del Re B, Franceschini A, Capri M, Lukas S, Bersani F, Giorgi G (2010) Synergic effect of retinoic acid and extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure on human neuroblastoma cell line BE(2)C. Bioelectromagnetics 31:425–433Google Scholar
  32. Nüsgen N, Goering W, Dauksa A, Biswas A, Jamil MA, Dimitriou I, Sharma A, Singer H, Fimmers R, Fröhlich H, Oldenburg J, Gulbinas A, Schulz WA, El-Maarri O (2015) Inter-locus as well as intra-locus heterogeneity in LINE-1 promoter methylation in common human cancers suggests selective demethylation pressure at specific CpGs. Clin Epigenetics 7:17. doi:10.1186/s13148-015-0051-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Hagan HM, Wang W, Sen S, Destefano Shields C, Lee SS, Zhang YW, Clements EG, Cai Y, Van Neste L, Easwaran H, Casero RA, Sears CL, Baylin SB (2011) Oxidative damage targets complexes containing DNA methyltransferases, SIRT1, and polycomb members to promoter CpG Islands. Cancer Cell 20:606–619. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pogribny IP, Beland F (2013) DNA methylome alterations in chemical carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 334:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qian Z, Shen Q, Yang X, Qiu Y, Zhang W (2015) The role of extracellular vesicles: an epigenetic view of the cancer microenvironment. Biomed Res Int 2015:649161. doi:10.1155/2015/649161 Google Scholar
  36. Qiu C, Fratiglioni L, Karp A, Winblad B, Bellander T (2004) Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Epidemiology 15:687–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schulz WA (2006) L1 retrotransposons in human cancers. J Biomed Biotechnol 2006(1):83672Google Scholar
  38. Stratton D, Lange S, Inal JM (2013) Pulsed extremely low-frequency magnetic fields stimulate microvesicle release from human monocytic leukaemia cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 430:470–475. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vijayalaxmi TJ, Prihoda (2009) Genetic damage in mammalian somatic cells exposed to extremely low frequency electro-magnetic fields: a meta-analysis of data from 87 publications (1990–2007). Int J Radiat Biol 85:196–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vrijheid M, Slama R, Robinson O, Chatzi L, Coen M, van den Hazel P, Thomsen C, Wright J, Athersuch TJ, Avellana N, Basagaña X, Brochot C, Bucchini L, Bustamante M, Carracedo A, Casas M, Estivill X, Fairley L, van Gent D, Gonzalez JR, Granum B, Gražulevičienė R, Gutzkow KB, Julvez J, Keun HC, Kogevinas M, McEachan RR, Meltzer HM, Sabidó E, Schwarze PE, Siroux V, Sunyer J, Want EJ, Zeman F, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ (2014) The human early-life exposome (HELIX): project rationale and design. Environ Health Perspect 122(6):535–544Google Scholar
  41. Watkins DJ, Wellenius GA, Butler RA, Bartell SM, Fletcher T, Kelsey KT (2014) Associations between serum perfluoroalkyl acids and LINE-1 DNA methylation. Environ Int 63:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang AS, Estécio MR, Doshi K, Kondo Y, Tajara EH, Issa JP (2004) A simple method for estimating global DNA methylation using bisulfite PCR of repetitive DNA elements. Nucleic Acids Res 32:e38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianfranco Giorgi
    • 1
  • Chiara Pirazzini
    • 2
  • Maria Giulia Bacalini
    • 2
  • Cristina Giuliani
    • 3
  • Paolo Garagnani
    • 2
    • 4
  • Miriam Capri
    • 2
    • 4
  • Ferdinando Bersani
    • 5
  • Brunella Del Re
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBiT)University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES)University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), Centre for Genome BiologyUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  4. 4.CIG-Interdepartmental Centre “L. Galvani” for Bioinformatics, Biophysics and BiocomplexityBolognaItaly
  5. 5.DIFA Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations