Advertisement

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 305–316 | Cite as

Modeling radiation-induced cell death: role of different levels of DNA damage clustering

  • M. P. Carante
  • S. Altieri
  • S. Bortolussi
  • I. Postuma
  • N. Protti
  • F. BallariniEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Some open questions on the mechanisms underlying radiation-induced cell death were addressed by a biophysical model, focusing on DNA damage clustering and its consequences. DNA “cluster lesions” (CLs) were assumed to produce independent chromosome fragments that, if created within a micrometer-scale threshold distance (d), can lead to chromosome aberrations following mis-rejoining; in turn, certain aberrations (dicentrics, rings and large deletions) were assumed to lead to clonogenic cell death. The CL yield and d were the only adjustable parameters. The model, implemented as a Monte Carlo code called BIophysical ANalysis of Cell death and chromosome Aberrations (BIANCA), provided simulated survival curves that were directly compared with experimental data on human and hamster cells exposed to photons, protons, α-particles and heavier ions including carbon and iron. d = 5 μm, independent of radiation quality, and CL yields in the range ~2–20 CLs Gy−1 cell−1, depending on particle type and energy, led to good agreement between simulations and data. This supports the hypothesis of a pivotal role of DNA cluster damage at sub-micrometric scale, modulated by chromosome fragment mis-rejoining at micrometric scale. To investigate the features of such critical damage, the CL yields were compared with experimental or theoretical yields of DNA fragments of different sizes, focusing on the base-pair scale (related to the so-called local clustering), the kbp scale (“regional clustering”) and the Mbp scale, corresponding to chromatin loops. Interestingly, the CL yields showed better agreement with kbp fragments rather than bp fragments or Mbp fragments; this suggests that also regional clustering, in addition to other clustering levels, may play an important role, possibly due to its relationship with nucleosome organization in the chromatin fiber.

Keywords

Ionizing radiation Cell death DNA cluster damage Chromosome aberrations Chromatin fragmentation Biophysical models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for data sharing and useful discussions to M.A. Tabocchini and co-workers concerning DNA fragmentation and to K. Prise and G. Schettino concerning cell survival. This work was partially supported by Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), project “ETHICS.”

References

  1. Alloni D, Campa A, Belli M, Esposito G, Facoetti A, Friedland W, Liotta M, Mariotti L, Paretzke HG, Ottolenghi A (2010) A Monte Carlo study of the radiation quality dependence of DNA fragmentation spectra. Radiat Res 173:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonelli F, Belli M, Campa A, Chatterjee A, Dini V, Esposito G, Rydberg B, Simone G, Tabocchini MA (2004) DNA fragmentation induced by Fe ions in human cells: shielding influence on spatially correlated damage. Adv Space Res 34:1353–1357ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballarini F (2010) From DNA radiation damage to cell death: theoretical approaches. J Nucleic Acids. doi: 10.4061/2010/350608 Google Scholar
  4. Ballarini F, Ottolenghi A (2004) A model of chromosome aberration induction and CML incidence at low doses. Radiat Environ Biophys 43:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballarini F, Ottolenghi A (2005) A model of chromosome aberration induction: applications to space research. Radiat Res 164:567–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballarini F, Alloni D, Facoetti A, Ottolenghi A (2008) Heavy-ion effects: from track structure to DNA and chromosome damage. New J Phys 10:075008. http://www.njp.org
  7. Ballarini F, Bortolussi S, Clerici AM, Ferrari C, Protti N, Altieri S (2011) From radiation-induced chromosome damage to cell death: modelling basic mechanisms and applications to boron neutron capture therapy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 143:523–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ballarini F, Altieri S, Bortolussi S, Giroletti E, Protti N (2013) A model of radiation-induced cell killing: insights into mechanisms and applications for hadrontherapy. Radiat Res 180:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ballarini F, Altieri S, Bortolussi S, Carante M, Giroletti E, Protti N (2014) The BIANCA model/code of radiation-induced cell death: application to human cells exposed to different radiation types. Radiat Environ Biophys 53:525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ballarini F, Altieri S, Bortolussi S, Carante MP, Giroletti E, Protti N (2015) The role of DNA cluster damage and chromosome aberrations in radiation-induced cell killing: a theoretical approach. Radiat Prot Dosim. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv135
  11.  Bedford JS, Mitchell JB, Griggs HG, Bender MA (1978) Radiation-induced cellular reproductive death and chromosome aberrations. Radiat Res 76:573–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belkic D (2014) Survival of radiation-damaged cells via mechanism of repair by pool molecules: the Lambert function as the exact analytical solution of coupled kinetic equations. J Math Chem 52:1201–1252MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Belli M, Cera F, Cherubini R, Dalla Vecchia M, Haque AMI, Ianzini F et al (1998) RBE-LET relationship for cell inactivation and mutation induced by low energy protons in V79 cells: further results at the LNL facility. Int J Radiat Biol 74:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Belli M, Bettega D, Calzolari P, Cherubini R, Cuttone G, Durante M et al (2008) Effectiveness of monoenergetic and spread-out Bragg peak carbon ions for inactivation of various normal and tumour cell lines. J Radiat Res 49:597–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bettega D, Calzolari P, Doglia SM, Dulio B, Tallone L, Villa AM (1998) Technical report: cell thickness measurements by confocal fluorescence microscopy on C3H10T1/2 and V79 cells. Int J Radiat Biol 74:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bolzer A, Kreth G, Solovei I, Koehler D, Saracoglu K, Fauth C, Muller S, Eils R, Cremer C, Speicher MR, Cremer T (2005) Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol 3(5):e157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brenner DJ (1988) On the probability of interaction between elementary radiation-induced chromosomal injuries. Radiat Environ Biophys 27:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carpenter S, Cornforth MN, Harvey WF, Raju MR, Schillaci ME, Wilder ME, Goodhead DT (1989) Radiobiology of ultrasoft X rays IV. Flat and round-shaped Hamster Cells (CHO-1OB, HS-23). Radiat Res 119:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carrano AV (1973) Chromosome aberrations and radiation-induced cell death. I. Transmission and survival parameters of aberrations. Mutat Res 17:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Charlton DE, Nikjoo H, Humm JL (1989) Calculations of initial yields of single- and double-strand breaks in cell nuclei from electrons, protons and alpha particles. Int J Radiat Biol 56:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chatterjee A, Holley WR (1992) Biochemical mechanisms and clusters of damage for high-let radiation. Adv Space Res 12:33–43ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chatterjee A, Schaefer HJ (1976) Microdosimetric structure of heavy ion tracks in tissue. Radiat Environ Biophys 13:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chaudhary P, Marshall T, Perozziello FM, Manti L, Currell FJ, Hanton F, McMahon SJ, Kavanagh JN, Cirrone GAP, Romano F, Prise KM, Schettino G (2014) Relative biological effectiveness variation along monoenergetic and modulated Bragg peaks of a 62-MeV therapeutic proton beam: preclinical assessment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen AM, Lucas JN, Simpson PJ, Griffin CS, Savage JRK, Brenner DJ, Hlatky LR, Sachs RK (1997) Computer simulation of data on chromosome aberrations produced by X rays or alpha particles and detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Radiat Res 148:S93–S101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cornforth M, Bedford J (1987) A quantitative comparison of potentially lethal damage repair and the rejoining of interphase chromosome breaks in low passage normal human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 111:385–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cox R, Thacker J, Goodhead DT (1977) Inactivation and mutation of cultured mammalian cells by aluminium characteristics ultrasoft X-rays II. Dose–response of Chinese hamster and human diploid cells to aluminium X-rays and radiations of different LET. Int J Radiat Biol 31:561–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Durante M (2013) New challenges in high-energy particle radiobiology. Br J Radiol 86:20130626Google Scholar
  28. Durante M, Loeffler JS (2010) Charged particles in radiation oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edwards AA, Moiseenko VV, Nikjoo H (1994) Modelling of DNA breaks and the formation of chromosome aberrations. Int J Radiat Biol 66:633–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Edwards AA, Moiseenko VV, Nikjoo H (1996) On the mechanism of the formation of chromosomal aberrations by ionising radiation. Radiat Environ Biophys 35:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferrari C, Bakeine J, Ballarini F, Boninella A, Bortolussi S, Bruschi P, Cansolino L, Clerici AM, Dionigi P, Protti N, Stella S, Zonta A, Zonta C, Altieri S (2011) In vitro and in vivo studies of boron neutron capture therapy: boron uptake/washout and cell death. Radiat Res 175:452–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Folkard M, Prise KM, Vojnovic B, Newman HC, Roper MJ, Michael BD (1996) Inactivation of V79 cells by low-energy protons, deuterons and helium-3 ions. Int J Radiat Biol 69:729–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Friedland W, Jacob P, Paretzke HG, Ottolenghi A, Ballarini F, Liotta M (2006) Simulation of light ion induced DNA damage patterns. Radiat Prot Dosim 122:116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Friedland W, Dingfelder M, Kundrat P, Jacob P (2011) Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC. Mutat Res 711:28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Friedrich T, Durante M, Scholz M (2012) Modeling cell survival after photon irradiation based on double-strand break clustering in megabase pair chromatin loops. Radiat Res 178:385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goodhead DT (1994) Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol 65:7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goodhead DT, Nikjoo H (1989) Track structure analysis of ultrasoft X-rays compared to high- and low-LET radiations. Int J Radiat Biol 55:513–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall E (2000) Radiobiology for the radiologist. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  39. Hill CK, Nelms BE, MacKay JF, Pearson DW, Kennan WS, Rock Mackie T, DeLuca PM Jr, Lindstrom MJ, Gould MN (1998) Synchrotron-produced ultrasoft X rays: equivalent cell survival at the isoattenuating energies 273 eV and 860 eV. Radiat Res 150:513–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoglund E, Blomquist E, Carlsson J, Stenerlow B (2000) DNA damage induced by radiation of different linear energy transfer: initial fragmentation. Int J Radiat Biol 76:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holley WR, Chatterjee A (1996) Clusters of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. 1. Theoretical modeling. Radiat Res 145:188–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 16 (1970)Google Scholar
  43. Jenner TJ, de Lara CM, O’Neill P, Stevens DL (1993) Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in V79-4 mammalian cells following gamma- and alpha-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 64:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnston PJ, Bryant PE (1994) A component of DNA double-strand break repair is dependent on the spatial orientation of the lesions within the higher-order structures of chromatin. Int J Radiat Biol 66:531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnston PJ, Olive PL, Bryant PE (1997) Higher-order chromatin structure-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks: modeling the elution of DNA from nucleoids. Radiat Res 148:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Katz L, Penfold AS (1952) Range–energy relations for electrons and the determination of beta-ray end-point energies by absorption. Rev Mod Phys 24:28–44ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kavanagh JN, Currell FJ, Timson DJ, Savage KI, Richard DJ, McMahon SJ, Hartley O, Cirrone GAP, Romano F, Prise KM, Bassler N, Holzscheiter MH, Schettino G (2013) Antiproton induced DNA damage: proton like in flight, carbon-ion like near rest. Sci Rep 3:1770. doi: 10.1038/srep01770 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kreth G, Pazhanisamy SK, Hausmann M, Cremer C (2007) Cell type-specific quantitative predictions of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations: a computer model approach. Radiat Res 167:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lea DE (1946) Action of radiation on living cells. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Lobrich M, Cooper PK, Rydberg B (1996) Non-random distribution of DNA double-strand breaks induced by particle irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 70:493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nagasawa H, Little JB (1981) Induction of chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges by X-rays in density-inhibited cultures of mouse 10T1/2 cells. Radiat Res 87:538–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Neti P, de Toledo SM, Perumal V, Azzam EI, Howell RW (2004) A multi-port low-fluence alpha-particle irradiator: fabrication, testing and benchmark radiobiology studies. Radiat Res 161:732–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neumaier T, Swenson J, Pham C, Polyzos A, Lo AT, Yang P-A, Dyball J, Asaithamby A, Chen DJ, Bissell MJ, Thalhammer S, Costes SV (2012) Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose–response nonlinearity in human cells. PNAS 109:443–448ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Wilson WE, Goodhead DT (2001) Computational approach for determining the spectrum of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 156:577–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ottolenghi A, Merzagora M, Tallone L, Durante M, Paretzke HG, Wilson WE et al (1995) The quality of DNA double-strand breaks: a Monte Carlo simulation of the end-structure of strand breaks produced by protons and alpha particles. Radiat Environ Biophys 34:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ottolenghi A, Ballarini F, Biaggi M (2001) Modelling chromosomal aberration induction by ionising radiation: the influence of interphase chromosome architecture. Adv Space Res 27:369–382ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pang D, Winters TA, Jung M, Purkayastha S, Cavalli LR, Chasovkikh S, Haddad BR, Dritschilo A (2011) Radiation generated short DNA fragments may perturb non-homologous end-joining and induce genomic instability. J Radiat Res 52:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paretzke HG (1987) Radiation track structure theory. In: Freeman GR (ed) Kinetics of non homogeneous processes. Wiley, New York, pp 89–170Google Scholar
  59. Phoenix B, Green S, Hill M, Jones B, Mill A, Stevens D (2009) Do the various radiations present in BNCT act synergistically? Cell survival experiments in mixed alpha-particle and gamma-ray fields. Appl Radiat Isotopes 67:S318–S320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ponomarev AL, Cucinotta FA (2006) Chromatin loops are responsible for higher counts of small DNA fragments induced by high-LET radiation, while chromosomal domains do not affect the fragment sizes. Int J Radiat Biol 82:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prise KM, Pinto M, Newman HC, Michael BD (2001) A review of studies of ionizing radiation-induced double-strand break clustering. Radiat Res 156:572–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reynolds P, Anderson JA, Harper JV, Hill MA, Botchway SW, Parker AW, O’Neill P (2012) The dynamics of Ku70/80 and DNA-PKcs at DSBs induced by ionizing radiation is dependent on the complexity of damage. Nucleic Acids Res 40:10821–10831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rothkamm K, Lobrich M (2003) Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5057–5062ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rydberg B (1996) Clusters of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. II. Experimental detection. Radiat Res 145:200–209ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rydberg B, Holley W, Saira Mian I, Chatterjee A (1998) Chromatin conformation in living cells: support for a zig-zag model of the 30 nm chromatin fiber. J Mol Biol 284:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rydberg B, Heilbronn L, Holley WR, Löbrich M, Zeitlin C, Chatterjee A, Cooper PK (2002) Spatial distribution and yield of DNA double-strand breaks induced by 3–7 MeV helium ions in human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 158:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Savage JRK (1995) The transmission of FISH-painted patterns derived from complex chromosome exchanges. Mutat Res 347:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Savage JRK (1996) Insight into sites. Mutat Res 366:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schimmerling W, Cucinotta FA, Wilson JW (2003) Radiation risk and human space exploration. Adv Space Res 31:27–34ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schipler A, Iliakis G (2013) DNA double-strand-break complexity levels and their possible contributions to the probability for error-prone processing and repair pathway choice. Nucleic Acids Res 41:7589–7605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sutherland RM, Bennett PV, Sutherland JC, Laval J (2002) Clustered DNA damages induced by X rays in human cells. Radiat Res 157:611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Terzoudi GI, Hatzi VI, Donta-Bakoyianni C, Pantelias GE (2011) Chromatin dynamics during cell cycle mediate conversion of DNA damage into chromatid breaks and affect formation of chromosomal aberrations: biological and clinical significance. Mutat Res 711:174–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thacker J, Stretch A, Stephens MA (1979) Mutation and inactivation of cultured mammalian cells exposed to beams of accelerated heavy ions II. Chinese hamster V79 cells. Int J Radiat Biol 36:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tsuboi K, Yang TC, Chen DJ (1992) Charged particle mutagenesis I. Cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of high-LET charged iron particles on human skin fibroblasts. Radiat Res 129:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang H, Zhang X, Wang P, Yu X, Essers J, Chen D, Kanaar R, Takeda S, Wang Y (2010) Characteristics of DNA-binding proteins determine the biological sensitivity to high-linear energy transfer radiation. Nucleic Acids Res 38:3245–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ward JF (1985) Biochemistry of DNA lesions. Radiat Res 104:S103–S111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ward JF (1994) The complexity of DNA damage: relevance to biological consequences. Int J Radiat Biol 66:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wu H, Durante M, Sachs RK, Yang TC (1997) Centric rings, acentric rings and excess acentric fragments based on a random-walk interphase chromosome model. Int J Radiat Biol 71:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. Carante
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Altieri
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Bortolussi
    • 2
  • I. Postuma
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. Protti
    • 2
  • F. Ballarini
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
  2. 2.INFN, Sezione di PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations