Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 763–774 | Cite as

OSL and thermally assisted OSL response in dental enamel for its possible application in retrospective dosimetry

  • Anuj Soni
  • D. R. Mishra
  • G. S. Polymeris
  • B. C. Bhatt
  • M. S. Kulkarni
Original Paper

Abstract

Dental enamel was studied for its thermoluminescence (TL) and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) defects. The TL studies showed a wide glow curve with multiple peaks. The thermally assisted OSL (TA-OSL) studies showed that the integrated TA-OSL and thus OSL signal increases with readout temperature between 100 and 250 °C, due to the temperature dependence of OSL. The thermally assisted energy EA associated with this increase is found to be 0.21 ± 0.015 eV. On the other hand, the signal intensity decreases with temperature between 260 and 450 °C. This decrease could be due to depletion of OSL active traps or possible thermal quenching. The increase of the OSL signal at increased temperature can be used to enhance the sensitivity of dental enamel for ex vivo measurements in retrospective dosimetry. The emission and excitation spectra of its luminescence centers were studied by photoluminescence and were found to be at 412 and 324 nm, respectively. It was found to possess multiple OSL active traps having closely lying photoionization cross sections characterized by continuous wave OSL and nonlinear OSL methods. The investigated dental enamel samples showed a linear OSL dose response up to 500 Gy. The dose threshold was found to be 100 mGy using a highly sensitive compact OSL reader with blue LED (470 nm) stimulation.

Keywords

Dental enamel Retrospective dosimetry Photoionization cross section Thermally assisted OSL (TA-OSL) 

References

  1. Afouxenidis D, Polymeris GS, Tsirliganis NC, Kitis G (2012) Computerised curve deconvolution of TL/OSL curves using a popular spreadsheet program. Radiat Prot Dosim 149:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akselrod MS, McKeever SWS (1999) A radiation dosimetry method using pulsed optically stimulated luminescence. Radiat Prot Dosim 81:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderle H, Stefaan I, Wild E, Bermanec V, Sővegjarto F (1998) Detection and dosimetry of irradiated biominerals with thermoluminescence, radiolyoluminescence and electron spin resonance measurements: comparison of methods. Radiat Meas 29:531–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailiff IK, Correcher V, Delgado A, Göksu Y, Hubner S (2002) Luminescence characteristics of dental ceramics for retrospective dosimetry: a preliminary study. Radiat Prot Dosim 101:519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balian HG, Eddy NW (1977) Figure-of-merit (FOM), an improved criterion over the normalized chisquared test for assessing goodness-of-fit of gamma-ray spectral peaks. Nucl Instrum Methods 145(2):389–395CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin BW, Flood AB, Salikhov I, Kobayashi K, Dong R, Rychert K, Du G, Schreiber W, Swartz HM (2014) In vivo EPR tooth dosimetry for triage after a radiation event involving large populations. Radiat Environ Biophys 53:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady JM, Aarestad NO, Schwartz HM (1968) In vivo dosimetry by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Health Phys 15:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeWitt R, Klein DM, Yukihara EG, Simon SL, McKeever SWS (2010) Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) of tooth enamel and its potential use in post-irradiation exposure triage. Health Phys 98(2):432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geber-Bergstrand T, Bernhardsson C, Mattsson SL, Rääf C (2012) Retrospective dosimetry using OSL of tooth enamel and dental repair materials irradiated under wet and dry conditions. Radiat Environ Biophys 51:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Godfrey-Smith DI (2008) Toward in vivo OSL dosimetry of human tooth enamel. Radiat Meas 43:854–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Godfrey-Smith DI, Pass B (1997) A new method of retrospective radiation dosimetry: optically stimulated luminescence in dental enamel. Health Phys 72(5):744–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huston AL, Justus BL, Falkenstein PL, Miller RW, Ning H, Altemus R (2001) Remote optical fiber dosimetry. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 184:55–67CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutt G, Jack I, Tchonka J (1988) Optical dating: K feldspars optical response stimulation spectra. Quat Sci Rev 7:381–385CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitis G, Gomez-Ros JM, Tuyn JWN (1998) Thermoluminescence glow-curve deconvolution functions for first, second and general orders of kinetics. J Phys D Appl Phys 31:2636–2641CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein DM, Yukihara EG, Bulur E, Durham JS, Akselrod MS, McKeever SWS (2005) An optical fiber radiation sensor for remote detection of radiological materials. IEEE Sens J 5:581–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kulkarni MS, Mishra DR, Sharma DN (2007) A versatile integrated system for thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence measurements. Nucl Instrum Method Phys Res B 262:348–356CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. McKeever SWS, Bϕtter-Jensen L, Agersnap Larsen N, Duller GAT (1997) Temperature dependence of OSL decay curves experimental and theoretical aspects. Radiat Meas 27:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mishra DR, Kulkarni MS, Rawat NS, Muthe KP, Gupta SK, Bhatt BC, Sharma DN (2008) Non-linear light modulation OSL phenomenon. Radiat Meas 43:1177–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mishra DR, Kulkarni MS, Rawat NS, Soni A, Bhatt BC, Sharma DN (2011a) Preliminary non-linear light modulation OSL studies using α-Al2O3: C. Radiat Meas 46:1462–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mishra DR, Anuj Soni, Rawat NS, Kulkarni MS, Bhatt BC, Sharma DN (2011b) Method of measuring thermal assistance energy associated with OSL traps in α-Al2O3: C phosphor. Radiat Meas 46:635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pass B, Godfrey-Smith DI, Scallion P (2003) Retrospective radiation dosimetry using optically stimulated luminescence in dental enamel: possibilities for in vivo dosimetry. In: Proceedings of the 36th midyear topical meeting “radiation safety aspects of homeland security and emergency response”, Health Physics Society, San Antonio, Texas, January 27–29, pp 210–217Google Scholar
  22. Polf JC, McKeever SWS, Akselrod MS, Holmstrom S (2002) A real-time, fibre optic dosimetry system using Al2O3 fibres. Radiat Prot Dosim 100:301–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Secu CE, Cherestes M, Secu M, Cherestes C, Paraschiva V, Barca C (2011) Retrospective dosimetry assessment using the 380 °C thermoluminescence peak of tooth enamel. Radiat Meas 46:1109–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shimano T, Iwaski M, Miyazawa C, Miki T, Kai A, Ikeya M (1989) Human tooth dosimetry for gamma-rays and dental X-rays using ESR. Appl Radiat Isot 40:1035–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sholom S, DeWitt R, Simon SL, Bouville A, McKeever SWS (2011) Emergency dose estimation using optically stimulated luminescence from human tooth enamel. Radiat Meas 46:778–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soni A, Mishra DR, Bhatt BC, Gupta SK, Rawat NS, Kulkarni MS, Sharma DN (2012) Characterization of deep energy level defects in α-Al2O3: C using thermally assisted OSL. Radiat Meas 47:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soni A, Mishra DR, Bhatt BC, Gupta SK, Rawat NS, Kulkarni MS, Sharma DN (2013) Improvement in dose threshold of α-Al2O3: C using thermally assisted OSL. Radiat Meas 49:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swartz HM, Iwasaki A, Walczak T, Demidenko E, Salikhov I, Khan N, Lesniewski P, Thomas J, Romanyukha A, Schauer D, Starewicz P (2006) In vivo EPR dosimetry to quantify exposures to clinically significant doses of ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosim 120(1–4):163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wieser A, Darroudi F (2014) EPRBioDose 2013: EPR applications and biological dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim 101:217–220Google Scholar
  30. Wieser A, El-Faramawy N (2002) Dose reconstruction with electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of deciduous teeth. Radiat Prot Dosim 101:545–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wieser A, Vasilenko E, Aladova E, Fattibene P, Semiochkina N, Smetanin M (2014) Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements of absorbed dose in teeth from citizens of Ozyorsk. Radiat Environ Biophys 53:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams BB, Dong R, Flood AB, Grinberg O, Kmiec M, Lesniewski PN, Matthews TP, Nicolalde RJ, Raynolds T, Salikhov IK, Swartz HM (2011) A deployable in vivo epr tooth dosimeter for triage after a radiation event involving large populations. Radiat Meas 46(9):772–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yukihara EG, Whitley VH, McKeever SWS, Akselrod AE, Akselrod MS (2004) Effect of high-dose irradiation on the optically stimulated luminescence of Al2O3: C. Radiat Meas 38:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yukihara EG, Mittani J, McKeever SWS, Simon SL (2007) Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) of dental enamel for retrospective assessment of radiation exposure. Radiat Meas 42:1256–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anuj Soni
    • 1
  • D. R. Mishra
    • 1
  • G. S. Polymeris
    • 2
  • B. C. Bhatt
    • 1
  • M. S. Kulkarni
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiological Physics and Advisory DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CenterTrombayIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Nuclear SciencesAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations