Uncomfortable issues in radiation protection posed by low-dose radiobiology
- 557 Downloads
This paper aims to stimulate discussion about the relevance for radiation protection of recent findings in low-dose radiobiology. Issues are raised which suggest that low-dose effects are much more complex than has been previously assumed. These include genomic instability, bystander effects, multiple stressor exposures and chronic exposures. To date, these have been accepted as being relevant issues, but there is no clear way to integrate knowledge about these effects into the existing radiation protection framework. A further issue which might actually lead to some fruitful approaches for human radiation protection is the need to develop a new framework for protecting non-human biota. The brainstorming that is being applied to develop effective and practical ways to protect ecosystems widens the debate from the narrow focus of human protection which is currently about protecting humans from radiation-induced cancers.
KeywordsRadiation protection Non-targeted effects Chronic radiation exposures Non-human biota
We acknowledge support from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Canada Research Council Canada Research Chairs Program, the CANDU owners Group (COG), AREVA ltd and Cameco Ltd.
- Balogh A, Persa E, Bogdándi EN, Benedek A, Hegyesi H, Sáfrány G, Lumniczky K (2013) The effect of ionizing radiation on the homeostasis and functional integrity of murine splenic regulatory T cells. Inflamm Res 62(2):201–212Google Scholar
- Kolesnikova IS, Vorobtsova IE (2011) Radiation-induced “bystander effect” revealed by means of adaptive response in cocultured lymphocytes from humans of different genders. Radiats Biol Radioecol 51:542–548Google Scholar
- Larsson CM (2012) Biological basis for protection of the environment. Ann IRCP 41:208–217Google Scholar
- Manda K, Glasow A, Paape D, Hildebrandt G (2012) Effects of ionizing radiation on the immune system with special emphasis on the interaction of dendritic and T cells. Front Oncol 2:(article 102)Google Scholar
- Mothersill C, Seymour C (1997a) Lethal mutations and genomic instability. Int J Radiat Biol 77:751–758Google Scholar
- Multhoff G, Radons J (2012) Radiation, inflammation, and immune responses in cancer. Front Oncol 2:(article 58)Google Scholar
- Nagasawa H, Little JB (1992) Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles. Cancer Res 52:6394–6396Google Scholar
- Rozhdestvenskiĭ LM (2011) The threshold for radiation stochastic effects: arguments “pro” and “contra”. Applied realization. Radiats Biol Radioecol 51:576–594Google Scholar
- Rubner Y, Wunderlich R, Rühle PF, Kulzer L, Werthmöller N, Frey B, Weiss EM, Keilholz L, Fietkau R, Gaipl US (2012) How does ionizing irradiation contribute to the induction of anti-tumor immunity? Front Oncol 2:(article 75)Google Scholar
- Schaue D, Kachikwu EL, McBride WH (2012) Cytokines in radiobiological responses: a review. Radiat Res 178(6):505–523Google Scholar
- Smith RW, Mothersill C, Hinton T, Seymour CB (2011) Exposure to low level chronic radiation leads to adaptation to a subsequent acute X-ray dose and communication of modified acute X-ray induced bystander signals in medaka (Japanese rice fish, Oryzias latipes). Int J Radiat Biol 87:1011–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar