Maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and birth defects
So far, only a few studies investigated occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in pregnancy to cause birth defects (BDs). No association between BDs and ionizing radiation, although described for high-dose exposure, could ever be confirmed for employees, or specific job titles. Here, an explorative analysis of a prospective population-based birth cohort used to quantify the prevalence of BDs in infants between 1/2007 and 2/2008 is presented. An active examination of all livebirths by specially trained paediatricians in two defined areas was performed. Additionally, a study-specific questionnaire distributed among all becoming mothers in the surveyed regions included questions on maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation within the first trimester of pregnancy. In 3,816 births (including 165 infants with BDs; 4.3%), maternal answers concerning possible exposures to medical and occupational ionizing radiation were available. Relative risk (RR) estimates in mothers surveyed for occupational exposure to ionizing radiation (wearing a radiation dosimeter) and BDs in the offspring were calculated exploratively. A higher prevalence of infants with BDs (n = 4; 13.8%) was documented in newborns of the 29 surveyed mothers compared to that in 3,787 births from unexposed mothers (n = 161; 4.3%), corresponding to a RR of 3.2 (1.2–8.7). Excluding deformations, the RR increased to 4.0 (1.5–10.7). Adjustment for possible confounders did not change the results substantially.
KeywordsOccupational Exposure Ventricular Septal Defect Health Care Sector Explorative Result Estimate Risk Ratio
The underlying study was funded by “Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz; Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit”; Grant No. StSch. 4493. The list of all included BDs and a pdf-version of the questionnaire (in German) are available from the corresponding author.
- Frasch G, Fritsche E, Kammerer L, Karofsky R, Spiesl J, Stegemann R (2008) Die berufliche Strahlenexposition in Deutschland 2006. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz; Strahlenschutzregister. BfS-SG-11/08. ISSN 1611-8707, ISBN 978-3-86509-850-4: 18–33Google Scholar
- Queißer-Luft A, Wiesel A, Stolz G, Mergenthaler A, Kaiser M, Schlaefer K, Wahrendorf J, Blettner M, Spix C (2011) Birth defects in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany. Radiat Environ Biophys, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s00411-010-0349-2
- Sever LE, Gilbert ES, Hessol NA, McIntyre JM (1988) A case-control study of congenital malformations and occupational exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. Am J Epidemiol 127:226–242Google Scholar
- Shepard TH (1995) Catalogue of teratogenic agents. John Hopkins University press, Baltimore, pp 365–368Google Scholar
- Shuhaiber S, Einarson A, Radde IC, Sarkar M, Koren G (2002) A prospective-controlled study of pregnant veterinary staff exposed to inhaled anesthetics and x-rays. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 15:363–373Google Scholar
- Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder; available at http://www.regionalstatistik.de. Accesssed on 14 April 2009
- WHO; available at: http://www.euro.who.int . Accessed on 13 July 2005