Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 325–328

Maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and birth defects

  • Awi Wiesel
  • Claudia Spix
  • Andreas Mergenthaler
  • Annette Queißer-Luft
Short Communication

Abstract

So far, only a few studies investigated occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in pregnancy to cause birth defects (BDs). No association between BDs and ionizing radiation, although described for high-dose exposure, could ever be confirmed for employees, or specific job titles. Here, an explorative analysis of a prospective population-based birth cohort used to quantify the prevalence of BDs in infants between 1/2007 and 2/2008 is presented. An active examination of all livebirths by specially trained paediatricians in two defined areas was performed. Additionally, a study-specific questionnaire distributed among all becoming mothers in the surveyed regions included questions on maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation within the first trimester of pregnancy. In 3,816 births (including 165 infants with BDs; 4.3%), maternal answers concerning possible exposures to medical and occupational ionizing radiation were available. Relative risk (RR) estimates in mothers surveyed for occupational exposure to ionizing radiation (wearing a radiation dosimeter) and BDs in the offspring were calculated exploratively. A higher prevalence of infants with BDs (n = 4; 13.8%) was documented in newborns of the 29 surveyed mothers compared to that in 3,787 births from unexposed mothers (n = 161; 4.3%), corresponding to a RR of 3.2 (1.2–8.7). Excluding deformations, the RR increased to 4.0 (1.5–10.7). Adjustment for possible confounders did not change the results substantially.

References

  1. De Santis M, Cesari E, Nobili E, Straface G, Cavaliere AF, Caruso A (2007) Radiation effects on development. Birth Def Res C Embryo Today 81:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doyle P, Maconochie N, Roman E, Davies G, Smith PG, Beral V (2000) Fetal death and congenital malformation in babies born to nuclear industry employees: report from the nuclear industry family study. Lancet 356:1293–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frasch G, Fritsche E, Kammerer L, Karofsky R, Spiesl J, Stegemann R (2008) Die berufliche Strahlenexposition in Deutschland 2006. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz; Strahlenschutzregister. BfS-SG-11/08. ISSN 1611-8707, ISBN 978-3-86509-850-4: 18–33Google Scholar
  4. Green LM, Dodds L, Miller AB, Tomkins DJ, Li J, Escobar M (1997) Risk of congenital anomalies in children of parents occupationally exposed to low level ionising radiation. Occup Environ Med 54:629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Matte TD, Mulinare J, Erickson JD (1993) Case-control study of congenital defects and parental employment in health care. Am J Ind Med 24:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Queisser-Luft A, Stolz G, Wiesel A, Schlaefer K, Spranger J (2002) Malformations in newborn: results based on 40, 940 infants and fetuses from the Mainz congenital birth defect monitoring system (1990–1998). Arch Gynecol Obstet 266:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Queißer-Luft A, Wiesel A, Stolz G, Mergenthaler A, Kaiser M, Schlaefer K, Wahrendorf J, Blettner M, Spix C (2011) Birth defects in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany. Radiat Environ Biophys, this issue. doi:10.1007/s00411-010-0349-2
  8. Roman E, Doyle P, Ansell P, Bull D, Beral V (1996) Health of children born to medical radiographers. Occup Environ Med 53:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sever LE, Gilbert ES, Hessol NA, McIntyre JM (1988) A case-control study of congenital malformations and occupational exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. Am J Epidemiol 127:226–242Google Scholar
  10. Shepard TH (1995) Catalogue of teratogenic agents. John Hopkins University press, Baltimore, pp 365–368Google Scholar
  11. Shirangi A, Fritschi L, Holman CD, Bower C (2009) Birth defects in offspring of female veterinarians. J Occup Environ Med 51:525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shuhaiber S, Einarson A, Radde IC, Sarkar M, Koren G (2002) A prospective-controlled study of pregnant veterinary staff exposed to inhaled anesthetics and x-rays. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 15:363–373Google Scholar
  13. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder; available at http://www.regionalstatistik.de. Accesssed on 14 April 2009
  14. Suárez RC, Berard P, Harrison JD, Melo DR, Nosske D, Stabin M, Challeton-de Vathaire C (2007) Review of standards of protection for pregnant workers and their offspring. Radiat Prot Dosim 127:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. WHO; available at: http://www.euro.who.int . Accessed on 13 July 2005
  16. Zhang J, Cai WW, Lee DJ (1992) Occupational hazards and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Ind Med 21:397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Awi Wiesel
    • 1
  • Claudia Spix
    • 2
  • Andreas Mergenthaler
    • 2
  • Annette Queißer-Luft
    • 1
  1. 1.Birth Registry Mainz Model, Children’s HospitalUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and InformaticsUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations