Advertisement

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 743–745 | Cite as

Overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: poorly substantiated information published

  • Sergei V. Jargin
Letter to the Editor

Previously, we commented on some publications overestimating medical consequences of the Chernobyl accident (Jargin 2007; 2009a, b). In this context, it is interesting to note that the New York Academy of Sciences published recently a volume dedicated to the Chernobyl accident (New York Academy of Sciences 2009). Most of the articles in this volume are authored by Alexei Vladimirovich Yablokov, whose work was previously criticized (Jargin 2010). In New York Academy of Sciences 2009, Prof. Yablokov cites mass media, commercial editions, websites of unclear affiliation and other non-professional publications, to substantiate his opinion. At the same time, international literature on the medical consequences of the Chernobyl accident is scarcely quoted and almost not discussed. Articles by other authors in (New York Academy of Sciences 2009) also include poorly substantiated information.

To give an example, Chap. 13 in New York Academy of Sciences 2009on “Decorporation of Chernobyl...

Keywords

Chronic Pancreatitis International Atomic Energy Agency Atrophic Gastritis York Academy Chernobyl Accident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Balaram P, Mani KS (1994) Low dose radiation–a curse or a boon? Natl Med J India 7:169–172Google Scholar
  2. Bandazhevskaya GS, Nesterenko VB, Babenko VI, Yerkovich TV, Bandazhevsky YI (2004) Relationship between caesium (137Cs) load, cardiovascular symptoms, and source of food in ‘Chernobyl’ children–preliminary observations after intake of oral apple pectin. Swiss Med Wkly 134:725–729Google Scholar
  3. Ghiassi-nejad M, Mortazavi SM, Cameron JR, Niroomand-rad A, Karam PA (2002) Very high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran: preliminary biological studies. Health Phys 82:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. GraphPad (1999) The Instat guide to choosing and interpreting statistical tests. GraphPad InStat version 3.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, California, USA. (http://www.graphpad.com)
  5. IAEA (2006) Chernobyl’s Legacy: health, environmental and socio- economic impacts and recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. (IAEA, Vienna): pp 57Google Scholar
  6. Jargin SV (2007) Over-estimation of radiation-induced malignancy after the Chernobyl accident. Virchows Arch 451:105–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jargin SV (2009a) Overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: biophysical aspects. Radiat Environ Biophys 48:341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jargin SV (2009b) Overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: calculation of a latent period for tumors with unproven radiation etiology. Radiat Environ Biophys 48:433–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jargin SV (2010) Plagiarism and misquoting in the field of environmental pathology. Pract Conc 16(1):18. Available at http://derm101.com Google Scholar
  10. Mould RF (2000) The Chernobyl record. The definite history of Chernobyl catastrophe. (Institute of Physics, Philadelphia): pp 65–68; 176–177Google Scholar
  11. Nesterenko BV, Nesterenko AV (2009) 13. Decorporation of Chernobyl radionuclides. Ann NY Acad Sci 1181:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nesterenko VB, Nesterenko AV, Babenko VI, Yerkovich TV, Babenko IV (2004) Reducing the 137Cs-load in the organism of “Chernobyl” children with apple-pectin. Swiss Med Wkly 134:24–27Google Scholar
  13. New York Academy of Sciences (2009) Chernobyl: consequences of the catastrophe for people and the environment. Ann NY Acad Sci, vol 1181Google Scholar
  14. Prekeges JL (2003) Radiation hormesis, or, could all that radiation be good for us? J Nucl Med Technol 31:11–17Google Scholar
  15. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the general assembly. Annex J. Exposure and Effects of the Chernobyl Accident. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Yablokov AV (2009a) 3. General Morbidity, Impairment, and Disability after the Chernobyl Catastrophe. Ann NY Acad Sci 1181:42–54CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Yablokov AV (2009b) 5. Nonmalignant diseases after the Chernobyl catastrophe. Ann NY Acad Sci 1181:58–160CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Yablokov AV (2009c) 7. Mortality after the Chernobyl catastrophe. Ann NY Acad Sci 1181:192–216CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Yablokov AV (2009d) Conclusion to chapter IV. Ann NY Acad Sci 1181:327CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.People’s Friendship University of Russia (Moscow)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations