Radiation risk estimates after radiotherapy: application of the organ equivalent dose concept to plateau dose–response relationships
Estimates of secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy are becoming more important for comparative treatment planning. Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions for each individual patient. The dose distributions can be converted into organ equivalent doses to describe radiation-induced cancer after radiotherapy (OEDrad-ther) in the irradiated organs. The OEDrad-ther concept assumes that any two dose distributions in an organ are equivalent if they cause the same radiation-induced cancer risk. In this work, this concept is applied to dose–response relationships, which are leveling off at high dose. The organ-dependent operational parameter of this dose–response relationship was estimated by analyzing secondary cancer incidence data of patients with Hodgkin’s disease. The dose distributions of a typical radiotherapy treatment plan for treating Hodgkin’s disease was reconstructed. Dose distributions were calculated in individual organs from which cancer incidence data were available. The model parameter was obtained by comparing dose and cancer incidence rates for the individual organs.
KeywordsResponse Relationship Dose Distribution Absolute Excess Risk Cancer Incidence Data Organ Equivalent Dose
The authors would like to express their appreciation to the editor Dr. Werner Rühm for his helpful comments and ideas during revision of this manuscript.
- 3.ICRP (1991) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP 21(1-3). Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 5.Broerse JJ. (1999) Radiation induced cancer in animals. In: Baumstark-Khan C et al. (ed) Fundamentals for the assessment of risks from environmental radiation. Kluver, Dordrecht, pp. 379–388Google Scholar
- 6.Mole RH (1984) Dose-response relationships. In: Boice JD, Fraumeni JF (eds) Radiation carcinogenesis: epidemiology and biological significance. Raven, New York pp. 403–420Google Scholar
- 7.Hall EJ, Wuu CS (2003) Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56(1):83–88Google Scholar
- 10.UNSCEAR (2000) Report to the general assembly, sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Volume II: Effects, Annex I: Epidemiological evaluation of radiation-induced cancer. http://www.unscear.org/reports/2000_2.htmlGoogle Scholar
- 12.van Leeuwen FE, Travis LB (2001) Second cancers. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 2939–2964Google Scholar