Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 213–217

NOREC, a Monte Carlo code for simulating electron tracks in liquid water

Original Paper

Abstract

The work reported here was originally motivated by a discussion of Monte Carlo computer codes for electron transport in water given in Report No. 130 by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). It was pointed out (correctly) that a published depth-dose distribution calculated by the Oak Ridge electron transport code, OREC, for 800 keV electrons normally incident on a water slab was apparently in error, possibly due to inadequate treatment of elastic scattering. In this paper we describe the replacement of the original OREC elastic cross sections by current ones from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). This investigation led also to the critical examination and revision of some other parts of the program, as described here. The revised code, which we have renamed NOREC, represents the first substantial review and modification of the Oak Ridge code in a number of years. We also present some comparisons of results calculated with the old and new versions and discuss their implications with respect to earlier studies. We have also written a version of NOREC in C++ language, which is available to other investigators. This paper provides a record of a response to the NCRP published statement and documentation for the revised code, NOREC.

References

  1. 1.
    Jenkins TM, Nelson WR, Rindi A (eds) (1988) Monte Carlo transport of electrons and photons. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Varma MN, Chatterjee A (eds) (1994) Computational approaches in molecular radiation biology. Monte Carlo methods. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nikjoo H, Uehara S, Wilson WE, Hoshi M, Goodhead DT (1998) Track structure in radiation biology: theory and applications. Int J Radiat Biol 73:355–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Uehara S, Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT (1999) Comparison and assessment of electron cross sections for Monte Carlo track structure codes. Radiat Res 152:202–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamm RN, Wright HA, Ritchie RH, Turner JE, Turner TP (1976) Monte Carlo calculation of transport of electrons through liquid water. In: Booz J, Ebert HG, Smith BGR (eds) Proceedings of the fifth symposium on microdosimetry, Verbania-Pallanza. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Vol II, pp 1037–1053Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ritchie RH, Hamm RN, Turner JE, Wright HA (1978) The interaction of swift electrons with liquid water. In: Booz J, Ebert HG (eds) Sixth symposium on microdosimetry, Brussels. Commission of the European Communities, Harwood, London, Vol I, pp 345–354Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ritchie RH, Hamm RN, Turner JE, Wright HA, Bolch WE (1991) Radiation interactions and energy transport in the condensed phase. In: Glass WA, Varma MN (eds) Physical and chemical mechanisms in molecular radiation biology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 99–135Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caswell RS, Seltzer SM (1994) Monte Carlo and analytic methods in the transport of electrons, neutrons, and alpha particles. In: Varma MN, Chatterjee A (eds) Computational approaches in molecular radiation biology. Monte Carlo methods. Plenum Press, New York, pp 115–136Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NCRP (1999) Biological effects and exposure limits for "hot particles" (Report 130). National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, p 22Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crawford OH, Turner JE, Hamm RN, Ashley JC (1991) Effects of the tissue-air interface in calculations of β-particle skin dose at a depth of 70 μm. Health Phys 61:641–645PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berger MJ, Seltzer SM, Wang R, Schechter A (1993) Elastic scattering of electrons and positrons by atoms: database ELAST (Report NISTIR 5188). U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MDGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Riley ME (1974) Relativistic, elastic electron scattering from atoms at energies greater than 1 keV (Report No. SLA-74-0107). Sandia LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riley ME, MacCallum CJ, Biggs F (1975) Theoretical electron-atom elastic scattering cross sections. Selected elements, 1 keV to 256 keV. At Data Nucl Data Tables 15:443–476Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mann JB (1973) SCF Hartree-Fock results for elements with two open shells and for the elements francium to nobelium. At Data Nucl Data Tables 12:1–86Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mann JB, Waber JT (1973) Self-consistent relativistic Dirac-Hartree-Fock calculations of lanthanide atoms. At Data 5:201–229Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Desclaux JP (1975) A multiconfiguration relativistic Dirac-Fock program. Comp Phys Comm 9:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seltzer SM (1991) Electron-photon Monte Carlo calculations: the ETRAN code. Appl Radiat Isot 42:917–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Friedland W, Jacob P, Paretzke HG, Stork T (1998) Monte Carlo simulation of the production of short DNA fragments by low-linear energy transfer radiation using higher-order DNA models. Radiat Res 150:170–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dingfelder M, Hantke D, Inokuti M, Paretzke HG (1998) Electron inelastic-scattering cross sections in liquid water. Radiat Phys Chem 53:1–18Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Turner JE, Hamm RN, Souleyrette ML, Martz DE, Rhea TA, Schmidt DW (1988) Calculations for β dosimetry using Monte Carlo code (OREC) for electron transport in water. Health Phys 55:741–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ICRU (1984) Stopping powers for electrons and positrons (Report 37). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bolch WE, Turner JE, Yoshida H, Jacobson KB, Wright HA, Hamm RN (1990) Monte Carlo calculations of free ammonia production in deoxygenated solutions of glycylglycine irradiated by X rays and 60Co γ rays. Radiat Res 121:248–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turner JE, Bolch WE, Yoshida H, Jacobson KB, Wright HA, Hamm RN, Ritchie RH, Klots CE (1991) Radiation damage to a biomolecule: new physical model successfully traces molecular events. Int J Rad Appl Instrum A 42:995–1001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turner JE, Hamm RN, Ritchie RH, Bolch WE (1994) Monte Carlo track-structure calculations for aqueous solutions containing biomolecules. In: Varma MN, Chatterjee A (eds) Computational approaches in molecular radiation biology. Monte Carlo methods. Plenum Press, New York, pp 155–166Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamm RN, Stabin MG, Turner JE (1998) Investigation of a Monte Carlo model for chemical reactions. Radiat Environ Biophys 37:151–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bolch WE, Turner JE, Yoshida H, Jacobson KB, Hamm RN, Crawford OH (1998) Product yields from irradiated glycylglycine in oxygen-free solutions: Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experiments. Radiat Environ Biophys 37:157–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aydogan B, Marshall DT, Swarts SG, Turner JE, Boone AJ, Richards NG, Bolch WE (2002) Site-specific OH attack to the sugar moiety of DNA: a comparison of experimental data and computational simulation. Radiat Res 157:38–44PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.127 Windham RoadOak RidgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental and Radiological Health SciencesColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  4. 4.School of Health SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations