Advertisement

Geochemistry of Eocene-Early Oligocene low-temperature crustal melts from Greater Himalayan Sequence (Nepal): a nanogranitoid perspective

  • Omar BartoliEmail author
  • Antonio Acosta-Vigil
  • Bernardo Cesare
  • Laurent Remusat
  • Adriana Gonzalez-Cano
  • Markus Wälle
  • Lucie Tajčmanová
  • Antonio Langone
Original Paper
  • 165 Downloads

Abstract

Despite melt inclusions in migmatites and granulites provide a wealth of information on crustal anatexis in different geological scenarios, a complete compositional study (including trace elements and H2O) is yet to be made for the Himalayan rocks. In this contribution, we focus on nanogranitoids occurring in peritectic garnet of migmatites from Kali Gandaki valley in central Nepal (Greater Himalayan Sequence, GHS). The microstructural position of the nanogranitoids proves that these melts were produced at 650–720 °C and 1.0–1.1 GPa, during the Eohimalayan prograde metamorphism (41–36 Ma) associated with crustal thickening. Nanogranitoid compositions (mostly granodiorites, tonalities and trondhjemites) resemble those of experimental melts produced during H2O-present melting of meta-sedimentary rocks. They have variable H2O concentrations (6.5–14.4 wt%), which are similar to the expected minimum and maximum values for crustal melts produced at the inferred P–T conditions. These compositional signatures suggest that melt formation occurred in the proximity of the H2O-saturated solidus, in a rock-buffered system. The low-to-very low contents of Zr (3–8 ppm), Th (0.1–1.2 ppm) and LREE (4–11 ppm) along with the weak-to-moderate positive Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 1.2–3.3), the high B concentrations (200–3400 ppm) and the high U/Th ratio (up to 21) point to the lack of equilibration between melt and accessory minerals and are consistent with melting of plagioclase at low temperature. Kali Gandaki nanogranitoids record the beginning of melting in a H2O-present system that, in other GHS localities, may have produced voluminous crustal melts. We demonstrate that compositional comparison with nanogranitoids may be useful to reconstruct the petrogenesis of Eohimalayan granitoids.

Keywords

Nanogranitoids Greater Himalayan Sequence Low-T crustal melts H2O-present melting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research benefitted from funding from the Italian Ministry of Education, University, Research (Progetto SIR RBSI14Y7PF), from Padova University (Grant BART_SID19_01) and from Società Italiana di Mineralogia e Petrologia (Grant for a research stay abroad) to OB; from the CARIPARO (Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo) project MAKEARTH to BC. The National NanoSIMS facility at the MNHN was established by funds from the CNRS, Région Ile de France, Ministère délégué à l’Enseignement supérieur et à la Recherche, and the MNHN. Remi Duhamel is thanked for his support during NanoSIMS analyses. We would like to thank Ed Sawyer and Roberto Weinberg for their detailed and constructive reviews, which improved the manuscript.

Supplementary material

410_2019_1622_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Supplementary file1 (XLSX 13 kb)

References

  1. Acosta A, Pereira MD, Shaw DM, London D (2001) Contrasting behaviour of B during crustal anatexis. Lithos 56:15–31Google Scholar
  2. Acosta-Vigil A, London D, Morgan GBVI (2006) Experiments on the kinetics of partial melting of a leucogranite at 200 MPa H2O and 690–800 °C: compositional variability of melts during the onset of H2O-saturated crustal anatexis. Contrib Mineral Petrol 151:539–557Google Scholar
  3. Acosta-Vigil A, Cesare B, London D, Morgan GB VI (2007) Microstructures and composition of melt inclusions in a crustal anatectic environment, represented by metapelitic enclaves within El Hoyazo dacites, SE Spain. Chem Geol 235:450–465Google Scholar
  4. Acosta-Vigil A, Buick I, Hermann J, Cesare B, Rubatto D, London D, Morgan GBVI (2010) Mechanisms of crustal anatexis: a geochemical study of partially melted metapelitic enclaves and host dacite, SE Spain. J Petrol 51:785–821Google Scholar
  5. Acosta-Vigil A, Buick I, Cesare B, London D, Morgan GBVI (2012a) The extent of equilibration between melt and residuum during regional anatexis and its implications for differentiation of the continental crust: a study of partially melted metapelitic enclaves. J Petrol 53:1319–1356Google Scholar
  6. Acosta-Vigil A, London D, Morgan GBVI (2012b) Chemical diffusion of major and minor components in granitic liquids: implications for the rates of homogenization of crustal melts. Lithos 153:308–323Google Scholar
  7. Acosta-Vigil A, Barich A, Bartoli O, Garrido C, Cesare B, Remusat L, Poli S, Raepsaet C (2016) The composition of nanogranitoids in migmatites overlying the Ronda peridotites (Betic Cordillera, S Spain): the anatectic history of a polymetamorphic basement. Contrib Mineral Petrol 171:24Google Scholar
  8. Acosta-Vigil A, London D, Morgan VIGB, Cesare B, Buick I, Hermann J, Bartoli O (2017) Primary crustal melt compositions: Insights into the controls, mechanisms and timing of generation from kinetics experiments and melt inclusions. Lithos 286–287:454–479Google Scholar
  9. Aikman AB, Harrison TM, Hermann J (2012) The origin of Eo- and Neo-himalayan granitoids, Eastern Tibet. J Asian Earth Sci 58:143–157Google Scholar
  10. Aubaud C, Withers AC, Hirschmann MM, Guan Y, Leshin LA, Mackwell SJ, Bell DR (2007) Intercalibration of FTIR and SIMS for hydrogen measurements in glasses and nominally anhydrous minerals. Am Mineral 92:811–828Google Scholar
  11. Barich A, Acosta-Vigil A, Garrido CJ, Cesare B, Tajcˇmanová L, Bartoli O (2014) Microstructures and petrology of melt inclusions in the anatectic sequence of Jubrique (Betic Cordillera, S Spain): implications for crustal anatexis. Lithos 206–207:303–320Google Scholar
  12. Bartoli O, Cesare B, Poli S, Acosta-Vigil A, Esposito R, Turina A, Bodnar RJ, Angel RJ, Hunter J (2013a) Nanogranite inclusions in migmatitic garnet: behavior during piston cylinder re-melting experiments. Geofluids 13:405–420Google Scholar
  13. Bartoli O, Cesare B, Poli S, Bodnar RJ, Acosta-Vigil A, Frezzotti ML, Meli S (2013b) Recovering the composition of melt and the fluid regime at the onset of crustal anatexis and S-type granite formation. Geology 41:115–118Google Scholar
  14. Bartoli O, Tajčmanová L, Cesare B, Acosta-Vigil A (2013c) Phase equilibria constraints on melting of stromatic migmatites from Ronda (S. Spain): insights on the formation of peritectic garnet. J Metamorph Geol 31:775–789Google Scholar
  15. Bartoli O, Cesare B, Remusat L, Acosta-Vigil A, Poli S (2014) The H2O content of granite embryos. Earth Planet Sci Lett 395:281–290Google Scholar
  16. Bartoli O, Acosta-Vigil A, Ferrero S, Cesare B (2016a) Granitoid magmas preserved as melt inclusions in high-grade metamorphic rock. Am Mineral 101:1543–1559Google Scholar
  17. Bartoli O, Acosta-Vigil A, Tajčmanová L, Cesare B, Bodnar RJ (2016b) Using nanogranitoids and phase equilibria modeling to unravel anatexis in the crustal footwall of the Ronda peridotites (Betic Cordillera, S Spain). Lithos 256–257:282–299Google Scholar
  18. Brown RL, Nazarchuk JH (1993) Annapurna detachment fault in the Greater Himalaya of Central Nepal. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 74:461–473Google Scholar
  19. Brown CR, Yakymchuk C, Brown M, Fanning CM, Korhonen FJ, Piccoli PM, Siddoway CS (2016) From source to sink: petrogenesis of Cretaceous anatectic granites from the Fosdick migmatite-granite complex, West Antarctica. J Petrol 57:1241–1278Google Scholar
  20. Carosi R, Gemignani L, Godin L, Iaccarino S, Larson KP, Montomoli C, Rai SM (2014) A geological journey through the deepest gorge on Earth: the Kali Gandaki valley section, west-central Nepal. J Virtual Explor.  https://doi.org/10.3809/Jvirtex.vol.2014.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carosi R, Montomoli C, Langone A, Turina A, Cesare B, Iaccarino S, Fascioli L, Visonà D, Ronchi A, Rai SM (2015) Eocene partial melting recorded in peritectic garnets from kyanite-gneiss, Greater Himalayan Sequence, central Nepal. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 412:111Google Scholar
  22. Carosi R, Montomoli C, Iaccarino S (2018) 20 years of geological mapping of the metamorphic core across Central and Eastern Himalayas. Earth Sci Rev 177:124–138Google Scholar
  23. Carvalho BB, Sawyer EW, Janasi VA (2016) Crustal reworking in a shear zone: transformation of metagranite to migmatite. J Metamorph Geol 34:237–264Google Scholar
  24. Carvalho BB, Sawyer EW, Janasi VA (2017) Enhancing maficity of granitic magma during anatexis: entrainment of infertile mafic lithologies. J Petrol 58:1333–1362Google Scholar
  25. Carvalho BB, Bartoli O, Ferri F, Cesare B, Ferrero F, Remusat L, Capizzi L, Poli S (2019) Anatexis and fluid regime of the deep continental crust: new clues from melt and fluid inclusions in metapelitic migmatites from Ivrea Zone (NW Italy). J Metamorph Geol 37:951–975Google Scholar
  26. Cesare B, Maineri C (1999) Fluid-present anatexis of metapelites at El Joyazo (SE Spain): constraints from Raman spectroscopy of graphite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 135:41–52Google Scholar
  27. Cesare B, Acosta-Vigil A, Bartoli O, Ferrero S (2015) What can we learn from melt inclusions in migmatites and granulites? Lithos 239:186–216Google Scholar
  28. Chappell BW, White AJR, Wyborn D (1987) The importance of residual source material (Restite) in granite petrogenesis. J Petrol 28:1111–1138Google Scholar
  29. Coggon R, Holland TJB (2002) Mixing properties of phengitic micas and revised garnet–phengite thermobarometers. J Metamorph Geol 20:683–696Google Scholar
  30. Davidson C, Grujic DE, Hollister LS, Schmid SM (1997) Metamorphic reactions related to decompression and synkinematic intrusion of leucogranite, High Himalayan Crystallines, Bhutan. J Metamorph Geol 15:593–612Google Scholar
  31. Ferrero S, Angel R (2018) Micropetrology: Are inclusions grains of truth? J Petrol 59:1671–1700Google Scholar
  32. Ferrero S, Wunder B, Walczak K, O’Brien PJ, Ziemann MA (2015) Preserved near ultrahigh-pressure melt from continental crust subducted to mantle depths. Geology 43:447–450Google Scholar
  33. Forshaw JB, Waters DJ, Pattison DRM, Palin RM, Gopon PA (2019) Comparison of observed and thermodynamically predicted phase equilibria and mineral compositions in mafic granulites. J Metamorph Geol 37:153–179Google Scholar
  34. Gao L-E, Zeng L, Asimow PD (2017) Contrasting geochemical signatures of fluid-absent versus fluid-fluxed melting of muscovite in metasedimentary sources: the Himalayan leucogranites. Geology 45:39–42Google Scholar
  35. García-Casco A, Haissen F, Castro A, El-Hmidi H, Torres-Roldán RL, Millán G (2003) Synthesis of staurolite in melting experiments of a natural metapelite: consequences for the phase relations in low-temperature pelitic migmatites. J Petrol 44:1727–1757Google Scholar
  36. Godin L (2003) Structural evolution of the Tethyan sedimentary sequence in the Annapurna area, central Nepal Himalaya. J Asian Earth Sci 22:307–328Google Scholar
  37. Godin L, Parish RR, Brown L, Hodges KV (2001) Crustal thickening leading to exhumation of the Himalayan Metamorphic core of central Nepal: insight from U-Pb geochronology and 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology. Tectonics 20:729–747Google Scholar
  38. Groppo C, Rubatto D, Rolfo F, Lombardo B (2010) Early Oligocene partial melting in Main Central Thrust Zone (Arun valley, eastern Nepal Himalaya). Lithos 118:287–301Google Scholar
  39. Groppo C, Rolfo F, Indares A (2012) Partial melting in the Higher Himalayan Crystallines of Eastern Nepal: the effect of decompression and implications for the ‘Channel Flow’ model. J Petrol 53:1057–1088Google Scholar
  40. Guillong M, Meier DL, Allan MM, Heinrich CA, Yardley BWD (2008) SILLS: a MATLAB-based program for the reduction of laser ablation ICP-MS data of homogeneous materials and inclusions. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, Vancouver, pp 328–333Google Scholar
  41. Guilmette C, Indares A, Hébert R (2011) High-pressure anatectic paragneisses from the Namche Barwa, Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis: textural evidence for partial melting, phase equilibria modeling and tectonic implications. Lithos 124:66–81Google Scholar
  42. Halter WE, Pettke T, Heinrich CA, Rothen-Rutishauser B (2002) Major to trace element analysis of melt inclusions by laser-ablation ICP–MS: methods of quantification. Chem Geol 183:63–86Google Scholar
  43. Harris N, Massey J (1994) Decompression and anatexis of Himalayan metapelites. Tectonics 13:1537–1546Google Scholar
  44. Harris N, Ayres M, Massey J (1995) Geochemistry of granitic melts produced during the incongruent melting of muscovite: implication for the extraction of Himalayan leucogranite magmas: J Geoph Res 100:15767–15777Google Scholar
  45. Harrison TM (2006) Did the Himalayan crystallines extrude partially molten from beneath the Tibetan Plateau? In: Law RD, Searle MP, Godin L (eds) Geological constraints on channel flow and ductile extrusion as an important orogenic process—Himalaya-Tibetan Plateau, vol 268. Geological Society, London, Special Publication, London, pp 237–254Google Scholar
  46. Hodges KV (2000) Tectonics of the Himalaya and southern Tibet from two perspectives. Geol Soc Am Bull 112:324–350Google Scholar
  47. Hodges KV, Parrish RR, Searle MP (1996) Tectonic evolution of the central Annapurna Range, Nepalese Himalayas. Tectonics 15:1264–1291Google Scholar
  48. Holland TJB, Powell R (1998) An internally consistent thermodynamic data set for phases of petrological interest. J Metamorph Geol 16:309–343Google Scholar
  49. Holland TJB, Powell R (2003) Activity-composition relations for phases in petrological calculations: an asymmetric multicomponent formulation. Contrib Mineral Petrol 145:492–501Google Scholar
  50. Holland TJB, Powell R (2011) An improved and extended internally consistent thermodynamic dataset for phases of petrological interest, involving a new equation of state for solids. J Metamorph Geol 29(3):333–383Google Scholar
  51. Holtz F, Johannes W, Tamic N, Behrens H (2001) Maximum and minimum water contents of granitic melts generated in the crust: a reevaluation and implications. Lithos 56:1–14Google Scholar
  52. Hu X, Garzanti E, Wang J, Huang W, An W, Webb A (2016) The timing of India-Asia collision onset—facts, theories, controversies. Earth Sci Rev 160:264–299Google Scholar
  53. Iaccarino S, Montomoli C, Carosi R, Massonne H-J, Langone A, Visonà D (2015) Pressure–temperature–time–deformation path of kyanite-bearing migmatitic paragneiss in the Kali Gandaki valley (Central Nepal): investigation of Late Eocene-Early Oligocene melting processes. Lithos 231:103–121Google Scholar
  54. Iaccarino S, Montomoli C, Carosi R, Massonne H-J, Langone A, Visonà D (2017) Geology and tectono-metamorphic evolution of the Himalayan metamorphic core: insights from the Mugu Karnali transect, Western Nepal (Central Himalaya). J Metamorph Geol 35:301–325Google Scholar
  55. Inger S, Harris NBW (1992) Tectonothermal evolution of the High Himalayan crystalline sequence, Langtang Valley, northern Nepal. J Metamorph Geol 10:439–452Google Scholar
  56. Kellett DA, Godin L (2009) Pre-Miocene deformation of the Himalayan superstructure, Hidden valley, central Nepal. J Geol Soc Lond 166:261–275Google Scholar
  57. Kohn MJ (2014) Himalayan metamorphism and its tectonic implications. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 42:381–419Google Scholar
  58. Liu Y, Siebel W, Massonne H-J, Xiao X (2007) Geochronological and petrological constraints for the tectonic evolution of the central Greater Himalayan Sequence in the Kharta area, southern Tibet. J Geol 115:215–230Google Scholar
  59. Montel JM (1993) A model for monazite/melt equilibrium and applications to the generation of granitic magmas. Chem Geol 110:127–146Google Scholar
  60. Newton RC, Charlu TV, Kleppa OJ (1980) Thermochemistry of high structural state plagioclases. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 44:933–941Google Scholar
  61. Palin RM, Searle MP, St-Onge MR, Waters DJ, Roberts NMW, Horstwood MSA, Parrish RR, Weller OM, Chen S, Yang J (2014) Monazite geochronology and petrology of kyanite- and sillimanite-grade migmatites from the northwestern flank of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis. Gondwana Res 26:323–347Google Scholar
  62. Patiño Douce AE, Harris N (1998) Experimental constraints on Himalayan anatexis. J Petrol 39:689–710Google Scholar
  63. Pognante U, Benna P (1993) Metamorphic zonation, migmatization and leucogranites along the Everest transect of Eastern Nepal and Tibet: record of an exhumation history. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 74:323–340Google Scholar
  64. Prince C, Harris N, Vance D (2001) Fluid-enhanced melting during prograde metamorphism. J Geol Soc 158:233–242Google Scholar
  65. Roedder E (1979) Fluid inclusions as samples of ore fluids. In: Barnes HL (ed) Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 684–737Google Scholar
  66. Rosenberg CL, Handy MR (2005) Experimental deformation of partially melted granite revisited: implications for the continental crust. J Metamorph Geol 23:19–28Google Scholar
  67. Rubatto D, Chakraborty S, Dasgupta S (2013) Timescales of crustal melting in the Higher Himalayan crystallines (Sikkim, Eastern Himalaya) inferred from trace element-constrained monazite and zircon chronology. Contrib Mineral Petrol 165:349–372Google Scholar
  68. Rudnick RL, Gao S (2014) Composition of the continental crust. In: Rudnick RL (ed) Treatise on geochemistry, 2nd edn., pp 1–51Google Scholar
  69. Sawyer EW (2010) Migmatites formed by water-fluxed partial melting of a leucogranodiorite protolith: microstructures in the residual rocks and source of the fluid. Lithos 116:273–286Google Scholar
  70. Sawyer EW (2014) The inception and growth of leucosomes: microstructure at the start of melt segregation in migmatites. J Metamorph Geol 32:695–712Google Scholar
  71. Schwindinger M, Weinberg RF, Clos F (2019) Wet or dry? The difficulty of identifying the presence of water during crustal melting. J Metamorph Geol 37:339–358Google Scholar
  72. Searle MP (2010) Low-angle normal faults in the compressional Himalayan orogen; evidence from the Annapurna-Dhaulagiri Himalaya, Nepal. Geosphere 6:296–315Google Scholar
  73. Searle MP, Godin L (2003) The South Tibetan Detachment System and the Manaslu Leucogranite: a structural reinterpretation and restoration of the Annapurna-Manaslu Himalaya, Nepal. J Geol 111:505–523Google Scholar
  74. Sola AM, Hasalová P, Weinberg RF, Suzaño NO, Becchio RA, Hongn FD, Botelho N (2017) Low-P melting of metapelitic rocks and the role of H2O: insights from phase equilibria modeling. J Metamorph Geol 35:1131–1159Google Scholar
  75. Stepanov AS, Hermann J, Rubatto D, Rapp RP (2012) Experimental study of monazite/melt partitioning with implications for the REE, Th and U geochemistry of crustal rocks. Chem Geol 300–301:200–220Google Scholar
  76. Sun SS, McDonough WF (1989) Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. In: Sanders AD, Norry MJ (eds) Magmatism in the ocean basins, vol 42. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, London, pp 313–345Google Scholar
  77. Tajčmanová L, Conolly JAD, Cesare B (2009) A thermodynamicmodel for titanium and ferric iron solution in biotite. J Metamorph Geol 27:153–165Google Scholar
  78. Thomas R, Klemm W (1997) Microthermometric study of silicate melt inclusions in Variscan granites from SE Germany: volatile contents and entrapment conditions. J Metamorph Geol 38:1753–1765Google Scholar
  79. Thomen A, Robert F, Remusat L (2014) Determination of the nitrogen abundance in organic materials by NanoSIMS quantitative imaging. J Anal At Spectrom 29:512–519Google Scholar
  80. Thompson JB, Hovis GL (1979) Entropy of mixing in sanidine. Am Mineral 64:57–65Google Scholar
  81. Tian Z, Zhang Z, Dong X (2016) Metamorphism of high-P metagreywacke from the Eastern Himalayan syntaxis: phase equilibria and P–T path. J Metamorph Geol 34:697–718Google Scholar
  82. Wang JM, Zhang JJ, Wang XX (2013) Structural kinematics, metamorphic P–T profiles and zircon geochronology across the Greater Himalayan Crystalline Complex in south–central Tibet: implication for a revised channel flow. J Metamorph Geol 31:607–628Google Scholar
  83. Wang JM, Rubatto D, Zhang JJ (2015) Timing of partial melting and cooling across the Greater Himalayan Crystalline Complex (Nyalam, Central Himalaya): in-sequence Thrusting and its implications. J Petrol 56(9):1677–1702Google Scholar
  84. Watson EB, Harrison TM (1984) Accessory minerals and the geochemical evolution of crustal magmatic systems: a summary and prospectus of experimental approaches. Phys Earth Planet Inter 35:19–30Google Scholar
  85. Weinberg (2016) Geology and tectono-metamorphic evolution of the Himalayan metamorphic core: insights from the Mugu Karnali transect, Western Nepal (Central Himalaya). J Metamorph Geol 35:301–325Google Scholar
  86. Weinberg R, Hasalová P (2015a) Water-fluxed melting of the continental crust: a review. Lithos 212–215:158–188Google Scholar
  87. Weinberg R, Hasalová P (2015b) Reply to comment by JD Clemens and G. Stevens on “Water-fluxed melting of the continental crust: a review”. Lithos 234:102–103Google Scholar
  88. Weinberg R, Searle MP (1999) Volatile-assisted intrusion and autometasomatism of leucogranites in the Khumbu Himalaya, Nepal. J Geol 107:27–48Google Scholar
  89. White RW, Powell R, Holland TJB, Worley BA (2000) The effect of TiO2 and Fe2O3 on metapelitic assemblages at greenschist and amphibolite facies conditions: mineral equilibria calculations in the system K2O–FeO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O–TiO2–Fe2O3. J Metamorph Geol 18:497–511Google Scholar
  90. White RW, Powell R, Holland TJB (2007) Progress relating to calculation of partial melting equilibria for metapelites. J Metamorph Geol 25:511–527Google Scholar
  91. White RW, Stevens G, Johnson TE (2011) Is the crucible reproducible? Reconciling melting experiments with thermodynamic calculations. Elements 7:241–246Google Scholar
  92. White RW, Powell R, Holland TJB, Johnson TE, Green ECR (2014) New mineral activity–composition relations for thermodynamic calculations in metapelitic systems. J Metamorph Geol 32:261–286Google Scholar
  93. Wolf MB, London D (1997) Boron in granitic magmas: stability of tourmaline in equilibrium with biotite and cordierite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 130:12–30Google Scholar
  94. Yakymchuk C (2017) Behaviour of apatite during partial melting of metapelites and consequences for prograde suprasolidus monazite growth. Lithos 274–275:412–426Google Scholar
  95. Yakymchuk C, Brown M (2014) Behaviour of zircon and monazite during crustal melting. J Geol Soc 171:465–479Google Scholar
  96. Zeng LS, Liu J, Gao LE, Xie KJ, Wen L (2009) Early Oligocene crustal anatexis in the Yardoi gneiss dome, southern Tibet and geological implications. Chin Sci Bull 54:104–112Google Scholar
  97. Zeng LS, Gao LE, Xie KJ, Liu-Zeng J (2011) Mid-Eocene high Sr/Y granites in the Northern Himalayan Gneiss Domes: melting thickened lower continental crust. Earth Planet Sci Lett 303:251–266Google Scholar
  98. Zhang H, Harris N, Parrish R, Kelley S, Zhang L, Rogers N, Argles T, King J (2004) Causes and consequences of protracted melting of the mid-crust exposed in the North Himalayan antiform. Earth Planet Sci Lett 228:195–212Google Scholar
  99. Zhang ZM, Zhao GC, Santosh M, Wang JL, Dong X, Liou JG (2010) Two stages of granulite facies metamorphism in the eastern Himalayan syntaxis, south Tibet: petrology, zircon geochronology and implications for the subduction of Neo-Tethys and the Indian continent beneath Asia. J Metamorph Geol 28:719–733Google Scholar
  100. Zhang Z, Xiang H, Dong X, Ding H, He Z (2015) Long-lived high-temperature granulite-facies metamorphism in the Eastern Himalayan orogen, south Tibet. Lithos 212–215:1–15Google Scholar
  101. Zhang Z, Xiang H, Dong X, Li W, Ding H, Gou Z, Tian Z (2017) Oligocene HP metamorphism and anatexis of the Higher Himalayan Crystalline Sequence in Yadong region, east-central Himalaya. Gondwana Res 41:173–187Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omar Bartoli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonio Acosta-Vigil
    • 2
  • Bernardo Cesare
    • 1
  • Laurent Remusat
    • 3
  • Adriana Gonzalez-Cano
    • 3
  • Markus Wälle
    • 4
  • Lucie Tajčmanová
    • 5
  • Antonio Langone
    • 6
  1. 1.Dipartimento di GeoscienzeUniversità degli Studi di PadovaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la TierraCSIC-Universidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Minératogie, de Physique des Matériaux et de Cosmochimie, IMPMCSorbonne Université, UMR CNRS 7590, lRDParisFrance
  4. 4.REAIT, CRC and CFI Services (CCCS)Memorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada
  5. 5.Institute of Earth SciencesHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
  6. 6.Istituto di Geoscienze e GeorisorseC.N.R. University of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations