Low-pressure–temperature stability of pyrope + quartz relative to orthopyroxene + kyanite: a new model for aluminous orthopyroxene with vacancies
Determination of the stability of pyrope with quartz could provide theoretical pressure–temperature (P–T) constraints on silica-saturated eclogites as well as near end-member pyrope-bearing terrains. The lower P–T stability of pyrope in the presence of quartz in the system MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 can be modeled by the reaction: 3 enstatite + 2 kyanite = 2 pyrope + 2 quartz. Reaction reversals were experimentally obtained using a ½-in.-diameter piston-cylinder press and a 1000-t multi-anvil press. Besides natural quartz, all other starting materials, including orthopyroxene, pyrope, and kyanite were synthesized. The reaction has been bracketed at 1.50 GPa at 1040–1080 °C; 1.69–1.79 GPa at 1000 °C; 2.26 GPa at 920–940 °C; 2.90 GPa at 840–860 °C. The bracketed boundary is higher in temperature and pressure than that calculated using the newest dataset of Holland et al. (J Petrol 59:881–900, https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egy048, 2018), particularly at higher pressures. Aluminum is usually thought to be taken into orthopyroxene in the form of Mg-Tschermak’s pyroxene (MgTs; MgAl2SiO6) under these experimental P–T conditions. In contrast, the observed orthopyroxene composition indicated the involvement of a non-stoichiometric component Mg-Eskola pyroxene (MgEs; Mg0.5☐0.5AlSi2O6), an aluminous orthopyroxene with octahedral vacancies (☐). End-member thermodynamic properties for MgEs as well as a mixing model for the ternary enstatite–MgTs–MgEs solid solution have been derived. The thermodynamic calculations, employing the mixing model, are in good agreement with the experimental brackets. The new model has potential applications to constrain P–T conditions of tectonic settings such as ultrahigh-pressure and ultrahigh-temperature metamorphisms.
KeywordsOrthopyroxene Quartz Pyrope Non-stoichiometry Mg-Eskola pyroxene Mg-Tschermak’s pyroxene
Thanks go to D. Collins for assistance with the electron microprobe analyses. Two anonymous reviewers are greatly acknowledged for their constructive and insightful reviews. T. L. Grove is appreciated for careful editorial handling. This research was supported in part by funding from the NSF Grant EAR-1725053 to DMJ.
Funding was provided by Division of Earth Sciences (EAR-1725053).
- Boyd FR, England JL (1960) Minerals of the mantle. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearb 59:47–52Google Scholar
- Boyd FR, England JL (1964) The system enstatite–pyrope. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearb 63:157–161Google Scholar
- Chopin C (1985) Les relations de phase dans les métapelites de haute pression. Approche expérimentale et naturaliste, conséquences géodynamiques pour les Alpes occidentales. PhD dissertation, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VIGoogle Scholar
- Danckwerth PA, Newton RC (1978) Experimental determination of the spinel peridotite to garnet peridotite reaction in the system MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 in the range 900°–1100 °C and Al2O3 isopleths of enstatite in the spinel field. Contrib Mineral Petrol 66:189–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eskola P (1921) On the eclogites of Norway. Vindenskaps Selskapets Skriefter, KlasseGoogle Scholar
- Harley SL (1998b) An appraisal of peak temperatures and thermal histories in ultrahigh-temperature (UHT) crustal metamorphism: the significance of aluminous orthopyroxene. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res Spec Issue 53:49–73Google Scholar
- Hensen BJ (1972) Phase relations involving pyrope, enstatitess, and sapphiriness in the system MgO–Al2O3–SiO2. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearb 71:421–427Google Scholar
- Holland TJB (1980) The reaction albite = jadeite + quartz determined experimentally in the range 600–1200 °C. Am Mineral 65:129–134Google Scholar
- Larson AC, Von Dreele RB (2004) General structure analysis system (GSAS). Los Alamos Natl Lab Rep LAUR 86-748Google Scholar
- Levien L, Prewitt CT, Weidner DJ (1980) Structure and elastic properties of quartz at pressure. Am Mineral 65:920–930Google Scholar
- MacGregor ID (1974) The system MgO–Al2O3–SiO2: solubility of Al2O3 in enstatite for spinel and garnet peridotite compositions. Am Mineral 59:110–119Google Scholar
- Manning CE (2018) Fluids of the lower crust: deep is different. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 46:67–97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perkins D (1983) The stability of Mg-rich garnet in the system CaO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 at 1000–1300 °C and high pressure. Am Mineral 68:355–364Google Scholar
- Walker D, Carpenter MA, Hitch CM (1990) Some simplifications to multianvil devices for high pressure experiments. Am Mineral 75:1020–1028Google Scholar