Advertisement

Crystallographic orientations of magnesiochromite inclusions in diamonds: what do they tell us?

  • Paolo NimisEmail author
  • Ross J. Angel
  • Matteo Alvaro
  • Fabrizio Nestola
  • Jeff W. Harris
  • Nicola Casati
  • Federica Marone
Original Paper
  • 141 Downloads

Abstract

We have studied by X-ray diffractometry the crystallographic orientation relationships (CORs) between magnesiochromite (mchr) inclusions and their diamond hosts in gem-quality stones from the mines Udachnaya (Siberian Russia), Damtshaa (Botswana) and Panda (Canada); in total 36 inclusions in 23 diamonds. In nearly half of the cases (n = 17), [111]mchr is parallel within error to [111]diamond, but the angular misorientation for other crystallographic directions is generally significant. This relationship can be described as a case of rotational statistical COR, in which inclusion and host share a single axis (1 df). The remaining mchr–diamond pairs (n = 19) have a random COR (2 df). The presence of a rotational statistical COR indicates that the inclusions have physically interacted with the diamond before their final incorporation. Of all possible physical processes that may have influenced mchr orientation, those driven by surface interactions are not considered likely because of the presence of fluid films around the inclusions. Mechanical interaction between euhedral crystals in a fluid-rich environment is therefore proposed as the most likely mechanism to produce the observed rotational COR. In this scenario, neither a rotational nor a random COR can provide information on the relative timing of growth of mchr and diamond. Some multiple, iso-oriented inclusions within single diamonds, however, indicate that mchr was partially dissolved during diamond growth, suggesting a protogenetic origin of these inclusions.

Keywords

Diamond Magnesiochromite Inclusion Crystallographic orientation Syngenesis Protogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by ERC Starting Grant INDIMEDEA to FN (agreement n. 307322). MA was supported by ERC Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (agreement n. 714936 for the project TRUE DEPTHS). JWH thanks the Diamond Trading Company (a member of the DeBeers Group of Companies) for the donation of the diamonds used in this study. We acknowledge the Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland, and the Diamond Light Source, UK, for provision of synchrotron radiation beamtime at the TOMCAT beamline of the SLS (experiment e15427) and at the I15 beamline of the DLS (experiment EE7616), respectively. We are grateful to M. Bruno for reviewing an early version of the manuscript and useful discussion, and to O. Navon and an anonymous reviewer for their formal reviews, which helped us improve the paper.

Supplementary material

410_2019_1559_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (6.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 6664 KB)

References

  1. Angel RJ, Milani S, Alvaro M, Nestola F (2015) OrientXplot: a program to analyse and display relative crystal orientations. J Appl Crystall 48:1330–1334.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671501167X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angel RJ, Milani S, Alvaro M, Nestola F (2016) High-quality structures at high pressure? Insights from inclusions in diamonds. Zeit Krystall 231:467–473.  https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2016-1949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bulanova GP (1995) The formation of diamond. J Geochem Expl 53:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(94)00016-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulanova GP, Griffin WL, Ryan CG (1998) Nucleation environment of diamonds from Yakutian kimberlites. Mineral Mag 62:409–419.  https://doi.org/10.1180/002646198547675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faul UH, Fitz Gerald JD (1999) Grain misorientations in partially molten olivine aggregates: an electron backscatter diffraction study. Phys Chem Miner 26:187–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002690050176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank-Kamenetsky VA (1964) The nature of structural impurities and inclusions in minerals. LGU Press, Leningrad (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. Futergendler SI, Frank-Kamenetsky VA (1961) Oriented inclusions of olivine, garnet and chrome-spinel in diamonds. Zapisky Vsesoyuznogo Mineralogicheskogo Obshestva 90:230–236 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Griffiths TA, Habler G, Abart R (2016) Crystallographic orientation relationships in host–inclusion systems: new insights from large EBSD data sets. Am Mineral 101:690–705.  https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2016-5442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Habler G, Griffiths T (2017) Crystallographic orientation relationships. In: Heinrich W, Abart R (eds) Mineral reaction kinetics: microstructures, textures, chemical and isotopic signatures, chap 15. EMU Notes in Mineralogy, vol 16. Mineralogical Society of Great Britain & Ireland, London, pp 541–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris JW (1968) The recognition of diamond inclusions. Part 1: syngenetic mineral inclusions. Ind Diamond Rev 28:402–410Google Scholar
  11. Harris JW, Gurney JJ (1979) Inclusions in diamond. In: Field JE (ed) The properties of diamond. Academic Press, London, pp 555–591Google Scholar
  12. Harris JW, Henrique R, Meyer HOA (1967) Orientation of silicate mineral inclusions in diamonds. Cryst Growth 7:118–123Google Scholar
  13. Hartman H (1954) A discussion on ‘Oriented olivine inclusions in diamond’. Am Mineral 39:674–675Google Scholar
  14. Hwang SL, Yui TF, Chu HT, Shen P, Schertl HP, Zhang RY, Liou JG (2007) On the origin of oriented rutile needles in garnet from UHP eclogites. J Metamorphic Geol 25:349–362.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2007.00699.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hwang SL, Yui TF, Chu HT, Shen P, Zhang RY, Liou JG (2011) An AEM study of garnet clinopyroxenite from the Sulu ultrahigh-pressure terrane: formation mechanisms of oriented ilmenite, spinel, magnetite, amphibole and garnet inclusions in clinopyroxene. Contrib Mineral Pet 161:901–920.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-010-0571-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hwang SL, Shen P, Chu HT, Yui TF, Iizuka Y (2013) A TEM study of the oriented orthopyroxene and forsterite inclusions in garnet from Otrøy garnet peridotite, WGR, Norway: new insights on crystallographic characteristics and growth energetics of exsolved pyroxene in relict majoritic garnet. J Metamorphic Geol 31:113–130.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang S-L, Shen P, Chu H-T, Yui T-F, Iizuka Y (2015) Origin of rutile needles in star garnet and implications for interpretation of inclusion textures in ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks. J Metamorphic Geol 33:249–272.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marone F, Stampanoni M (2012) Regridding reconstruction algorithm for real-time tomographic imaging. J Synchrotron Radiat 19:1029–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049512032864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer HOA (1985) Genesis of diamond: a mantle saga. Am Mineral 70:344–355Google Scholar
  20. Meyer HOA (1987) Inclusions in diamond. In: Nixon PH (ed) Mantle xenoliths. Wiley, London, pp 501–523Google Scholar
  21. Milani S, Nestola F, Angel RJ, Nimis P, Harris JW (2016) Crystallographic orientations of olivine inclusions in diamonds. Lithos 265:312–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2016.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell RS, Giardini AA (1953) Oriented olivine inclusions in diamond. Am Mineral 38:136–138Google Scholar
  23. Mutaftschiev B (2001) The atomistic nature of crystal growth. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04591-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nestola F, Nimis P, Angel RJ, Milani S, Bruno M, Prencipe M, Harris JW (2014) Olivine with diamond-imposed morphology included in diamonds. Syngenesis or protogenesis? Int Geol Rev 56:1658–1667.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2014.956153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nestola F, Alvaro M, Casati MN, Wilhelmd H, Kleppe AK, Jephcoat AP, Domeneghetti MC, Harris JW (2016) Source assemblage types for cratonic diamonds from X-ray synchrotron diffraction. Lithos 265:334–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2016.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nestola F, Haemyeong J, Taylor LA (2017) Mineral inclusions in diamonds may be synchronous but not syngenetic. Nat Commun 8:14168.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neuser RD, Schertl H-P, Logvinova AM, Sobolev NV (2015) An EBSD study of olivine inclusions in Siberian diamonds evidence for syngenetic growth? Russ Geol Geophys 56:321–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nimis P, Alvaro M, Nestola F, Angel RJ, Marquardt K, Rustioni G, Harris JW, Marone F (2016) First evidence of hydrous silicic fluid films around solid inclusions in gem-quality diamonds. Lithos 260:384–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2016.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nimis P, Nestola F, Schiazza M, Reali R, Agrosì G, Mele D, Tempesta G, Howell D, Hutchison MT, Spiess R (2018) Fe-rich ferropericlase and magnesiowüstite inclusions reflecting diamond formation rather than ambient mantle. Geology 47:27–30.  https://doi.org/10.1130/G45235.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orlov JL (1977) The mineralogy of diamond. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearson DG, Shirey SB (1999) Isotopic dating of diamonds. In: Lambert DD, Ruiz J (eds) Application of radiogenic isotopes to ore deposit research and exploration. Rev Econ Geol, vol 12. Soc Econ Geologists, Littleton, pp 143–171.  https://doi.org/10.5382/Rev.12.06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phillips D, Harris JW, Viljoen KS (2004) Mineral chemistry and thermobarometry of inclusions from De Beers Pool diamonds, Kimberley, South Africa. Lithos 77:155–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pokhilenko NP, Sobolev NV, Boyd FR, Pearson DG, Shimizu N (1993) Megacrystalline pyrope peridotites in the lithosphere of the Siberian platform: mineralogy, geochemical peculiarities and the problem of their origin. Russ Geol Geophys 34:56–67Google Scholar
  34. Proyer A, Krenn K, Hoinkes G (2009) Oriented precipitates of quartz and amphibole in clinopyroxene of metabasites from the Greek Rhodope: a product of open system precipitation during eclogite–granulite–amphibolite transition. J Metamorphic Geol 27:639–654.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2009.00844.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Royer L (1928) Recherches expérimentales sur l’épitaxie ou orientation mutuelle de cristaux d’espèces différentes. Bull Soc Fr Min 51:7–159Google Scholar
  36. Schulze DJ, Helmstaedt H, Cassie RM (1978) Pyroxene-ilmenite intergrowths in garnet pyroxenite xenoliths from a New York kimberlite and Arizona latites. Am Mineral 63:258–265Google Scholar
  37. Sobolev NV (1977) Deep-seated inclusions in kimberlites and the problem of the composition of the upper mantle. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stachel T, Harris JW (2008) The origin of cratonic diamonds—constraints from mineral inclusions. Ore Geol Rev 34:5–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2007.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wheeler J, Prior DJ, Jiang Z, Spiess R, Trimby PJ (2001) The petrological significance of misorientations between grains. Contrib Mineral Petrol 141:109–124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004100000225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiggers de Vries DF, Drury MR, de Winter DAM, Bulanova GP, Pearson DG, Davies GR (2011) Three-dimensional cathodoluminescence imaging and electron backscatter diffraction: tools for studying the genetic nature of diamond inclusions. Contrib Mineral Petrol 161:565–579.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-010-0550-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang Z, Fedortchouk Y (2012) Records of mantle metasomatism in the morphology of diamonds from the Slave craton. Eur J Mineral 24:619–632.  https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2012/0024-2214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang JF, Xu HJ, Liu Q, Green HW, Dobrzhinetskaya LF (2011) Pyroxene exsolution topotaxy in majoritic garnet from 250 to 300 km depth. J Metamorphic Geol 29:741–751.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2011.00939.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zyuzin NI (1967) On nature of orientation of garnet inclusion from Yakutian diamond. Geol Geofiz 8:126–128 (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di GeoscienzeUniversità degli Studi di PadovaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
  3. 3.School of Geographical and Earth SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  4. 4.Swiss Light SourcePaul Scherrer InstitutVilligenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations