Advertisement

Heterogeneous nucleation as the predominant mode of crystallization in natural magmas: numerical model and implications for crystal–melt interaction

  • Václav ŠpillarEmail author
  • David Dolejš
Original Paper

Abstract

Crystallization of natural magmas is inherently a disequilibrium process, which involves nucleation and growth kinetics, melt–crystal mechanical interactions and subsolidus modifications, which are all recorded in the resulting rock texture. We use a new high-resolution three-dimensional numerical model to address the significance and consequences of homogeneous versus heterogeneous crystal nucleation in silicate magmas. With increasing amount of heterogeneous nuclei during crystallization, initially equigranular textures evolve to porphyritic, bimodal and spherulitic types. The corresponding crystal size distributions (CSDs) become concave-up curved, the clustering index progressively decreases, and the grain contact relationships record increased clustering. Concave-up curved CSDs previously interpreted as resulting from multistage crystallization, mixing of crystal populations, grain agglomeration, or size-dependent growth are now predicted, consistently with other size, spatial and clustering parameters, to form by heterogeneous crystal nucleation. Correlation relationships between various textural parameters and the fraction of heterogeneous nuclei are calibrated and used on representative volcanic and plutonic rocks, including cumulate rocks, to deduce the fraction of heterogeneous nuclei. The results indicate that ~60 to ~99 % of all nuclei are heterogeneous. For plutonic and cumulate rocks, the estimate of the heterogeneous nuclei fraction based on the clustering index is significantly lower than other estimates. Such discrepancies, in general, point to the occurrence of other processes, and here, the results imply that crystal-mush compaction and interstitial melt extraction were involved during the magma solidification. Formation of crystals in clusters, implicit for heterogeneous nucleation, implies that greater efficiency of crystal–melt separation is expected in these situations.

Keywords

Heterogeneous nucleation CSD Crystal cluster Crystallization Quantitative texture measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Charles University Research Program P44 and the Czech Science Foundation Project Nr. 210/12/0986. We thank Hana Ditterová for providing us with the quantitative textural data for the sample CS-12. We greatly appreciate detailed and constructive reviews by George Bergantz, Sarah Gelman, Julia Hammer, Jillian Schleicher and an anonymous reviewer and editorial handling by Mark Ghiorso.

Supplementary material

410_2014_1103_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (174 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 173 kb)
410_2014_1103_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 1849 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MOV 3532 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MOV 5040 kb)

410_2014_1103_MOESM5_ESM.tif (2.5 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (TIFF 2608 kb)
410_2014_1103_MOESM6_ESM.tif (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 6 (TIFF 1753 kb)

References

  1. Armienti P, Pareschi MT, Innocenti F, Pompilio M (1994) Effect of magma storage and ascent on the kinetics of crystal growth. Contrib Mineral Petrol 115:402–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachmann O, Bergantz G (2008) The magma reservoirs that feed supereruptions. Elements 4:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker DR, Freda C (2001) Eutectic crystallization in the undercooled Orthoclase-Quartz-H2O system: experiments and simulations. Eur J Mineral 13:453–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bea F (2010) Crystallization dynamics of granite magma chambers in the absence of regional stress: multiphysics modeling with natural examples. J Petrol 51:1541–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brugger CR, Hammer JE (2010) Crystal size distribution analysis of plagioclase in experimentally decompressed hydrous rhyodacite magma. Earth Planet Sci Lett 300:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bues C, Dörr W, Fiala J, Vejnar Z, Zulauf G (2002) Emplacement depths and radiometric ages of Paleozoic plutons of the Neukirchen-Kdyně massif: differential uplift and exhumation of Cadomian basement due to Carboniferous orogenic collapse (Bohemian Massif). Tectonophysics 352:225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkhard DJM (2002) Kinetics of crystallization: example of micro-crystallization in basalt lava. Contrib Mineral Petrol 142:724–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkhart LE, Hoyt RC, Oolman T (1980) Control of particle size distribution and agglomeration in continuous precipitations. In: Kuczynski GC (ed) Sintering processes. Plenum, New York, pp 23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cashman KV, Marsh BD (1988) Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization II: makaopuhi lava lake. Contrib Mineral Petrol 99:292–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christian JW (2002) The theory of transformations in metals and alloys, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Oxford 1113 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis MJ, Ihinger PD (1998) Heterogeneous crystal nucleation on bubbles in silicate melt. Am Min 83:1008–1015Google Scholar
  12. Dörr W, Fiala J, Vejnar Z, Zulauf G (1998) U-Pb zircon ages and structural development of metagranitoids of the Teplá Crystalline complex: evidence for pervasive Cambrian plutonism within the Bohemian massif (Czech Republic). Geol Rundschau 87:135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dörr W, Zulauf G, Fiala J, Franke W, Vejnar Z (2002) Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian history of an active plate margin in the Teplá-Barrandian unit–a correlation of U-Pb isotopic-dilution-TIMS ages (Bohemia, Czech Republic). Tectonophysics 352:65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eberl DD, Kile DE, Drifts VA (2002) On geological interpretations of crystal size distributions: constant vs. proportionate growth. Am Min 87:1235–1241Google Scholar
  15. Fenn PM (1977) The nucleation and growth of alkali feldspars from hydrous melts. Can Min 15:135–161Google Scholar
  16. Hammer JE, Sharp TG, Wessel P (2010) Heterogeneous nucleation and epitaxial growth of magmatic minerals. Geology 38:367–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hecht L, Vigneresse JL, Morteani G (1997) Constraints on the origin of zonation of the granite complexes in the Fichtelgebirge (Germany and Czech Republic): evidence from a gravity and geochemical study. Geol Rundschau 86:S93–S109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hersum TG, Marsh BD (2006) Igneous microstructures from kinetic models of crystallization. J Volcanol Geoth Res 154:34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hersum TG, Marsh BD (2007) Igneous textures: on the kinetics behind the words. Elements 3:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Higgins MD (1996) Magma dynamics beneath Kameni volcano, Thera, Greece, as revealed by crystal size and shape measurements. J Volcanol Geoth Res 70:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins MD (2000) Measurement of crystal size distributions. Am Min 85:1105–1116Google Scholar
  22. Higgins MD (2002) A crystal size-distribution study of the Kiglapait layered mafic intrusion, Labrador, Canada: evidence for textural coarsening. Contrib Mineral Petrol 144:314–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Higgins MD (2006) Quantitative textural measurements in igneous and metamorphic petrology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 265 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Higgins MD (2011) Textural coarsening in igneous rocks. Int Geol Rev 53:354–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Higgins MD, Chandrasekharam D (2007) Nature of sub-volcanic magma chambers, Deccan Province, India: evidence from quantitative textural analysis of plagioclase megacrysts in the Giant Plagioclase Basalts. J Petrol 48:885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Higgins MD, Roberge J (2003) Crystal size distribution of plagioclase and amphibole from Soufriѐre Hills Volcano, Montserrat: evidence for dynamic crystallization-textural coarsening cycles. J Petrol 44:1401–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ikeda S, Toriumi M, Yoshida H, Shimizu I (2002) Experimental study of the textural development of igneous rocks in the late stage of crystallization: the importance of interfacial energies under non-equilibrium conditions. Contrib Mineral Petrol 142:397–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jerram DA, Cheadle MJ, Hunter RH, Elliott MT (1996) The spatial distribution of grains and crystals in rocks. Contrib Mineral Petrol 125:60–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jerram DA, Cheadle MJ, Philpotts AR (2003) Quantifying the building blocks of igneous rocks: are clustered crystal frameworks the foundation? J Petrol 44:2033–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lasaga AC (1998) Kinetic theory in the Earth sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton 811 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lofgren GE (1983) Effect of heterogeneous nucleation on basaltic textures: a dynamic crystallization study. J Petrol 24:229–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Machlin ES (2007) An introduction to aspects of thermodynamics and kinetics relevant to materials science, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Oxford 461 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. MacLellan HE, Trembath LT (1991) The role of quartz crystallization in the development and preservation of igneous texture in granitic rocks: experimental evidence at 1 kbar. Am Min 76:1291–1305Google Scholar
  34. Marsh BD (1989) Magma chambers. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 17:439–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marsh BD (1998) On the interpretation of crystal size distributions in magmatic systems. J Petrol 39:553–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mock A, Jerram DA, Breitkreuz C (2003) Using quantitative textural analysis to understand the emplacement of shallow-level rhyolitic laccoliths: a case study from the Halle Volcanic Complex, Germany. J Petrol 44:833–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mourtada-Bonnefoi CC, Laporte D (2004) Kinetics of bubble nucleation in a rhyolitic melt: an experimental study of the effect of ascent rate. Earth Planet Sci Lett 218:521–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Philpotts A, Ague J (2009) Principles of igneous and metamorphic petrology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 684 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pupier E, Duchene S, Toplis MJ (2008) Experimental quantification of plagioclase crystal size distribution during cooling of a basaltic liquid. Contrib Mineral Petrol 155:555–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
  41. Schwindinger K (1999) Particle dynamics and aggregation of crystals in a magma chamber with application to Kilauea Iki olivines. J Volcanol Geoth Res 88:209–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shelley D (1992) Igneous and metamorphic rocks under the microscope. Chapman & Hall, London 445 pGoogle Scholar
  43. Siebel W, Trzebski R, Stettner G, Hecht L, Casten U, Höhndorf A, Müller P (1997) Granitoid magmatism of the NEW Bohemian massif revealed: gravity data, composition, age relations and phase concept. Geol Rundsch 86:S45–S63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Siebel W, Shang CK, Presser V (2010) Permo-Carboniferous magmatism in the Fichtelgebirge: dating the youngest intrusive pulse by U-Pb, 207Pb/206Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. Z Geol Wiss 38:85–98Google Scholar
  45. Špillar V, Dolejš D (2013) Calculation of time-dependent nucleation and growth rates from quantitative textural data: inversion of crystal size distribution. J Petrol 54:913–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Špillar V, Dolejš D (2014) Kinetic model of nucleation and growth in silicate melts: implications for igneous textures and their quantitative description. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 131:164–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spry A (1969) Metamorphic textures. Pergamon Press, Oxford 350 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Swanson SE (1977) Relation of nucleation and crystal-growth rate to the development of granitic textures. Am Min 62:966–978Google Scholar
  49. Swanson SE, Fenn PM (1986) Quartz crystallization in igneous rocks. Am Mineral 71:331–342Google Scholar
  50. Ulrych J, Pivec E (1997) Age-related contrasting alkaline volcanic series in North Bohemia. Chem Erde 57:311–336Google Scholar
  51. Ulrych J, Svobodová J, Balogh K (2002) The source of Cenozoic volcanism in the České středohoří Mts., Bohemian Massif. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Abhandlungen 177:133–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ulrych J, Dostal J, Adamovič J, Jelínek E, Špaček P, Hegner E, Balogh K (2011) Recurrent Cenozoic volcanic activity in the Bohemian Massif (Czech Republic). Lithos 123:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vance JA (1969) On synneusis. Contrib Mineral Petrol 24:7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vejnar Z (1986) The Kdyně massif, South-West Bohemia—a tectonically modified basic layered intrusion: sborník Geologických Věd. Geologie 41:9–67Google Scholar
  55. Volmer M (1939) Kinetik der Phasenbildung. Theodor Steinkopff Verlag, Dresden 220 ppGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang Z-F (2012) Combining quantitative textural and geochemical studies to understand the solidification process of a granite porphyry: shanggusi, East Qinling, China. J Petrol 53:1807–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zieg MJ, Lofgren GE (2006) An experimental investigation of texture evolution during continuous cooling. J Volcanol Geoth Res 154:74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zieg MJ, Marsh BD (2002) Crystal size distribution and scaling laws in the quantification of igneous textures. J Petrol 43:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Petrology and Structural GeologyCharles UniversityPraha 2Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations