Advertisement

Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 166, Issue 2, pp 525–543 | Cite as

Early Palaeozoic deep subduction of continental crust in the Kyrgyz North Tianshan: evidence from Lu–Hf garnet geochronology and petrology of mafic dikes

  • Yamirka Rojas-AgramonteEmail author
  • Daniel Herwartz
  • Antonio García-Casco
  • Alfred Kröner
  • Dmitriy V. Alexeiev
  • Reiner Klemd
  • Stephan Buhre
  • Matthias Barth
Original Paper

Abstract

High-pressure and ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) eclogite-bearing metamorphic assemblages in the North Tianshan of Kyrgyzstan are known from the Aktyuz and Makbal areas, where eclogites and garnet amphibolites are associated with continental rocks such as granitoid gneisses in Aktyuz and shallow-water clastic (passive margin?) metasediments in Makbal. We present the first Lu–Hf isotope data for an eclogite and two garnet amphibolite samples from the two metamorphic terranes which, combined with petrological analysis, tightly constrain the age of high-pressure metamorphism in the Kyrgyz North Tianshan. A five-point isochron for an Aktyuz eclogite sample provides a Lu–Hf age of 474.3 ± 2.2 Ma, and a four-point isochron on a Makbal sample corresponds to 470.1 ± 2.5 Ma. A prograde, subduction-related path is inferred for both samples with peak P–T conditions ranging from 1.4 to 1.6 GPa and 610–620 °C. A further Makbal sample provided a significantly older Lu–Hf age of 486 ± 5.4 Ma, most likely due to late alteration in the sample (late addition of unradiogenic Hf). We conclude that garnet growth in all three samples occurred around ca. 474 Ma and that these rocks likely experienced UHP metamorphism contemporaneously. Our results support previous geochronological evidence for an Early Ordovician collision belt in the North Tianshan and allow refinement of a tectonic model involving subduction of thinned continental crust to considerable depth along the margin of a small microcontinent.

Keywords

Lu–Hf Mafic dike Aktyuz Makbal Northern Tianshan Kyrgyzstan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG grants RO4174/1-2 to Y. R.-A. and KR590/90-1 to A. K.) and RFBR Grants 09-05-91331, 11-05-91332 and 13-05-91151 to D.V. A. We thank associate editor Prof. Chris Ballhaus and reviewer Dr. Matthijs A. Smit for their positive and constructive review. We also thank A. Bakirov, K, Sakiev, D. Konopelko, K. Degtyarev and A. Ryazantsev for discussion and important comments and A. K. Rybin at the Research Station of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Bishkek for logistic support and hospitality during fieldwork. This is a contribution to IGCP Project 592 ‘Continental construction in Central Asia’.

Supplementary material

410_2013_889_MOESM1_ESM.doc (41 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 41 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM2_ESM.doc (47 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 47 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM3_ESM.tif (17.6 mb)
Fig. S1 Textural and compositional features of garnet from sample KG8. a, b, c and d Distribution of Xalm, Xsps, Xprp and Xgrs, respectively. e and f Composition profiles extracted from the quantified maps. g and h Triangular diagrams showing spot analyses and the quantified pixels of garnet (shown in figures a-d) expressed as absolute frequency colours. The maps and diagrams were calculated using a spot analysis of garnet as internal standard. (TIFF 17989 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM4_ESM.tif (19.6 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (TIFF 20116 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM5_ESM.tif (21.3 mb)
Fig. S2 Textural and compositional features of omphacite from sample KG8. a, b, c and d Distribution of Al, Ca, Mg apfu and Mg#, respectively. e and f Triangular diagrams showing spot analyses and the quantified pixels of omphacite (shown in figures a-d) expressed as absolute frequency colors. Figures a, b, c, d and f were calculated using a spot analysis of omphacite as internal standard. The classification scheme of figure e is from Morimoto et al. (1988). In figure f the spot analyses are plotted as Fe=Fe2+total and Fe=Fe2+ (calculated by stoichimetry) in order to compare with the quantified composition of the maps. (TIFF 21773 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM6_ESM.tif (17.8 mb)
Fig. S3 Textural and compositional features of amphibole from sample KG8. a, b, c and d Distribution of Al, Ca, Mg (atoms pfu) and Mg# (Fe = Fetot), respectively. e Composition of amphibole plotted in the classification scheme of Leake et al. (1997). The textural (regular) and compositional (italics) types of amphibole are indicated. Amphibole compositions are classified as calcic and sodic-calcic, as indicated by the colour code. f, g, h and i. Composition of amphibole plotted in the diagrams of Laird and Albee (1981). Figures a-d were calculated using a spot analysis of amphibole as internal standard. Note the complex growth-composition trend suggesting a complex P-T path, indicated by the black arrows in figure f (see text for details). (TIFF 18206 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM7_ESM.tif (19.6 mb)
Supplementary material 7 (TIFF 20066 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM8_ESM.tif (19.2 mb)
Fig. S4 Textural and compositional features of plagioclase from samples KG8 and KG79. a and b Distribution of Xan in scanned areas 3 and 2, respectively. c Composition of plagioclase. The textural types of plagioclase are indicated. Figures a and b were calculated using a spot analysis of plagioclase as internal standard. (TIFF 19669 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM9_ESM.tif (20.2 mb)
Fig. S5 a, b, c, d, and e Maps of Al-Kα, Mg-Kα, Ti-Kα, Fe-Kα and Mn-Kα showing the textural and compositional features of epidote, chlorite, rutile, ilmenite and titanite from sample KG8. f Composition of epidote. g and h Composition of chlorite. i Composition of ilmenite. (TIFF 20639 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM10_ESM.tif (17.9 mb)
Supplementary material 10 (TIFF 18285 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM11_ESM.tif (18 mb)
Fig. S6 Textural and compositional features of garnet from sample KG79a. a Al-Kα image of the scanned area that shows the replacement of garnet by Al-rich amphibole (after Grt1 and Grt2), which nicely depicts the former idiomorphic habit of garnet. b and c Distribution of Xsps and Xprp. d Representative core-to-rim composition profile. e and f Triangular diagrams showing spot analyses and the quantified pixels of garnet (i.e., those shown in figures b and c) expressed as absolute frequency colours. Figures b, c, e and f were calculated using a spot analysis of garnet as internal standard. (TIFF 18438 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM12_ESM.tif (19.6 mb)
Supplementary material 12 (TIFF 20052 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM13_ESM.tif (16.2 mb)
Fig. S7 Textural and compositional features of amphibole from sample KG79a. a Sketch showing the various stages of amphibole growth (cores and rims of matrix grains and replacements after garnet). This image was calculated using the atomic proportions of Ca, Al and Fe+Mn+Mg. b, c and d Distribution of atomic ratios Al/(Al+Fe+Mn+Mg), Ca/(Ca+Fe+Mn+Mg) and Mg# (Fe = Fetot), respectively. e Composition of amphibole plotted in the classification scheme of Leake et al. (1997). The textural (regular) and compositional (italics) types of amphibole are indicated. All types of amphibole are classified as calcic. f, g, h and i. Composition of amphibole plotted in the diagrams of Laird and Albee (1981). Note the increase in Na(B) from core-to-rim of matrix grains, recording increase in pressure, and the ensuing decrease in Na(B) and increase in Al in the replacements after garnet, indicating decrease in pressure and increase in temperature. Figures b-d were calculated using a spot analysis of amphibole as internal standard. (TIFF 16634 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM14_ESM.tif (19.7 mb)
Supplementary material 14 (TIFF 20209 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM15_ESM.tif (17.5 mb)
Fig. S8 a, b, c, d, and e Maps of Al-Kα, Fe-Kα, Mg-Kα, K-Kα and Ti-Kα showing the textural and compositional features of epidote, chlorite, biotite, rutile, ilmenite and titanite, respectively, from sample KG79a. See figure 5 for composition of these phases. (TIFF 17926 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM16_ESM.tif (16.4 mb)
Fig. S9 Textural and compositional features of garnet from sample KG79. a, b and c Distribution of Xgrs, Xsps and Mg#, respectively. d Representative core-to-rim composition profile. e and f Triangular diagrams showing spot analyses and the quantified pixels of garnet (shown in figures a-c) expressed as absolute frequency colours. All figures except d calculated using a spot analysis of garnet as internal standard. (TIFF 16778 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM17_ESM.tif (14.1 mb)
Supplementary material 17 (TIFF 14420 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM18_ESM.tif (16 mb)
Fig. S10 Textural and compositional features of amphibole from sample KG79. a, b, c and d Distribution of atomic ratios 100*Al/(Al+Si), Al/(Al+Fe+Mn+Mg), Ca/(Ca+Fe+Mn+Mg) and Mg# (Fe = Fetot), respectively. e Composition of amphibole plotted in the classification scheme of Leake et al. (1997). The textural (regular) and compositional (italics) types of amphibole are indicated. All types of amphibole are classified as calcic. f, g, h and i. Composition of amphibole plotted in the diagrams of Laird and Albee (1981). Note the increase in Na(B), recording increase in pressure, and the ensuing decrease in Na(B) and increase in Al, indicating decrease in pressure and increase in temperature. (TIFF 16382 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM19_ESM.tif (19.2 mb)
Supplementary material 19 (TIFF 19626 kb)
410_2013_889_MOESM20_ESM.tif (18.7 mb)
Fig. S11 a, b, c, d, and e Maps of Al-Kα, Fe-Kα, Mg-Kα, K-Kα and Ti-Kα showing the textural and compositional features of epidote, chlorite, biotite, paragonite, ilmenite, titanite, and hematite from sample KG79, respectively. See figure 5 for composition of these phases. (TIFF 19109 kb)

References

  1. Alexeiev DV, Ryazantsev AV, Kröner A, Tretyakov AA, Xia X, Liu DY (2011) Geochemical data and zircon ages for rocks in a high-pressure belt of Chu-Yili Mountains, southern Kazakhstan: implications for the earliest stages of accretion in Kazakhstan and the Tianshan. J Asian Earth Sci 42:805–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amelin Y, Kamo SL, Lee D-C (2011) Evolution of early crust in chondritic or nonchondritic earth inferred from U–Pb and Lu–Hf data for chemically abraded zircon from the Itsaq Gneiss complex, West Greenland. Can J Earth Sci 48:1–20Google Scholar
  3. Avdeev AV, Kovalev AA (1989) Ophiolites and evolution of the southwestern part of the Ural-Mongolia folded belt. Moscow University Publishing, p 227 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. Bakirov AB (1978) Tectonic position of metamorphic complexes of Tien Shan. Frunze, Ilim Publ. House p 262 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. Bakirov AB (1989) Tectonic features and formation conditions of the eclogite complexes of Tianshan. In: Zharikov VA, Fonarev VI (eds) Crystal crust in space and time, Metamorphic and hydrothermal processes. Nauka, Publishing House, Moscow, pp 193–203 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. Bakirov AB, Maksumova RA (2001) Geodynamic evolution of the Tien Shan lithosphere. Russ Geol Geophys 42:1359–1366Google Scholar
  7. Bakirov AB, Kotov VB, Kotova LS (1987) Stratigraphy of metamorphic complexes in the western part of Kyrgyz ridge. In: Korolev VG (ed) Caledonides of Tianshan. Ilim Publishing House, Frunze, pp 8–21 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Bakirov AB, Tagiri M, Sakiev KS (1998) Rocks of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic facies in the Tien Shan. Russ Geol Geophys 39:1709–1721Google Scholar
  9. Bakirov AB, Tagiri M, Sakiev KS, Ivleva EA (2003) The lower Precambrian rocks in the Tien Shan and their geodynamic setting. Geotectonics 37:368–380Google Scholar
  10. Bizzarro M, Baker JA, Haack H, Ulfbeck D, Rosing M (2003) Early history of earth’s crust-mantle system inferred from hafnium isotopes in chondrites. Nature 421:931–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlson WD (2012) Rates and mechanism of Y, REE, and Cr diffusion in garnet. Am Mineral 97:1598–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakabaev SE (ed) Geological Map of Kazakh SSR, scale 1:500,000, South Kazakhstan Series. Aerogeologiya (1979) Leningrad (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. Coleman RG, Lee DE, Beatty LB, Brannock WW (1965) Eclogites and eclogites: their differences and similarities. Geol Soc Am Bull 76:483–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connolly JAD (2009) The geodynamic equation of state: what and how. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 10:Q10014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connolly JAD, Kerrick D (1987) An algorithm and computer program for calculating composition phase diagrams. Calphad 11:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demina LI, Talitsky VG, Koroteeva E Yu (2005) Geodynamic conditions of formation of the eclogites and garnet amphibolites of the Makbal brachi-anticlinorium (Northern Tien-Shan). In: Ruzhentsev SV, Degtyarev KE (eds) Essays on the regional tectonics v2, Kazakhstan, Tien Shan, Polar Urals. Transactions of the Geological Institute, 561. Moscow, Nauka Publishing House, pp 100–129 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. Dobretsov NL. (1974) Glaucophane-schist and glaucophane-schist-eclogite complexes of the USSR. In: Sobolev VS (ed) Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Siberian branch Ac. Sci. USSR, Transactions, 57. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ. House, p 429 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. Dobretsov NL, Sobolev NV (1970) Eclogites from metamorphic complexes of the USSR. Phys Earth Planet Inter 3:54–76Google Scholar
  19. Dobretsov NL, Theunissen K, Smirnova LV (1998) Structural and geodynamic evolution of the diamondiferous metamorphic rocks of the Kokchetav Massif. Russ Geol Geophys 39:1631–1652Google Scholar
  20. Elvevold S, Gilotti JA (2000) Pressure-temperature evolution of retrogressed kyanite eclogites, Weinschenk Island, North-East Greenland Caledonides. Lithos 53:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faryad SW (2010) Significance of garnet peridotite and garnet clinopyroxenite studies for understanding deep subduction in the Moldanubian zone of the Bohemian Massif. In: Solid earth—Basic Science for the Human Habitat—ILP’s Second Potsdam Conference 2010. doi: 10.2312/GFZ.ILP034
  22. Fisher GW (1989) Matrix analysis of metamorphic mineral assemblages and reactions. Contrib Mineral Petrol 102:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher GW (1993) An improved method for algebraic analysis of metamorphic mineral assemblages. Am Mineral 78:1257–1261Google Scholar
  24. Ghes’ MD (2008) Terrane structure and geodynamic evolution of the Caledonides of TianShan. Bishkek, Altyn Tamga Publishing House, p 158 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  25. Glorie S, De Grave J, Buslov MM, Elburg MA, Stockli DF, Gerdes A, Van den haute P (2010) Multi-method chronometric constraints on the evolution of the Northern Kyrgyz Tien Shan granitoids (Central Asian Orogenic Belt): from emplacement to exhumation. J Asian Earth Sci 38:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herwartz D, Münker C, Scherer EE, Nagel TJ, Pleuger J, Froitzheim N (2008) Lu–Hf garnet geochronology of eclogites from the Balma Unit (Pennine Alps): implications for Alpine paleotectonic reconstructions. Swiss J Geosci 101(Supplement 1):173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herwartz D, Skublov SG, Berezin AV, Melnik AE (2012) First Lu–Hf garnet ages of eclogites from the Belmorian Mobile Belt, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Doklady Earth Sci 443:377–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holland TJB, Powell R (1998) An internally consistent thermodynamic data set for phases of petrological interest. J Metamorph Geol 16:309–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ishida C, Takasu A, Sakurai T, Akaboshi M, Tagiri M (2004) Coesite bearing Grt-Cld-Tlc schist from Makbal, Kyrgyzstan. Abstracts of the 111th Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of Japan. Chiba, Japan, p 274 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. Kato T (2005) New accurate Bence-Albee α-factors for oxides and silicates calculated from the PAP correction procedure. Geostand Geoanal Res 29:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelly ED, Carlson WD, Connelly JN (2011) Implications of garnet resorption for the Lu–Hf garnet geochronometer: an example from the contact aureole of the Makhavinekh Lake Pluton, Labrador. J Metamorph Geol 8:901–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khain EV, Bibikova EV, Kröner A, Zhuravlev DZ, Sklyarov EV, Fedetova AA, Kravchenko-Berezhnoy IR (2002) The most ancient ophiolites of the Central Asian fold belt: U–Pb and Pb–Pb zircon ages for the Dunzhugur complex, Eastern Sayan, Siberia, and geodynamic implications. Earth Planet Sci Lett 199:311–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirchenbaur M, Pleuger J, Jahn-Awe S, Nagel TJ, Froitzheim N, Fonseca ROC, Münker C (2012) Timing of high-pressure metamorphic events in the Bulgarian Rhodopes from Lu–Hf garnet geochronology. Contrib Mineral Petrol 163:897–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klemd R, Schröter FC, Will TM, Gao J (2002) P-T evolution of glaucophane-omphacite bearing HP-LT rocks in the western Tianshan Orogen, NW China: new evidence for, Alpine-type tectonics. J Metamorph Geol 20:239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klemd R, John T, Scherer EE, Rondenay S, Gao J (2011) Changes in dip of subducted slabs at depth: petrological and geochronological evidence from HP–UHP rocks (Tianshan, NW-China). Earth Planet Sci Lett 310:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Konopelko D, Kullerud K, Apayarov F, Sakiev K, Baruleva O, Ravna E, Lepekhina E (2012) SHRIMP zircon chronology of HP-UHP rocks of the Makbal metamorphic complex in the Northern Tien Shan, Kyrgyzstan. Gondwana Res 22:300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kozlovsky VM, Aranovich LYa (2008) Geological and structural conditions of eclogitization of Paleoproterozoic basic dikes in the eastern Belomorian mobile belt. Geotectonics 42:305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kretz R (1983) Symbols for rock-forming minerals. Am Mineral 68:277–279Google Scholar
  39. Kröner A, Wilde SA, Li JH, Wang KY (2005) Age and evolution of a late Archean to early Palaeoproterozoic upper to lower crustal section in the Wutaishan/Hengshan/Fuping terrain of northern China. J Asian Earth Sci 24:577–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kröner A, Wilde SA, Zhao GC, O’Brien PJ, Sun M, Liu DY, Wan YS, Liu SW, Guo JH (2006) Zircon geochronology of mafic dikes in the Hengshan Complex of northern China: evidence for late Palaeoproterozoic rifting and subsequent high-pressure event in the North China Craton. Precambr Res 146:45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kröner A, Alexeiev DV, Hegner E, Rojas-Agramonte Y, Corsini M, Chao Y, Wong J, Windley BF, Liu D, Tretyakov AA (2012) Zircon and muscovite ages, geochemistry, and Nd–Hf isotopes for the Aktyus metamorphic terrane: evidence for an Early Ordovician collisional belt in the northern Tianshan of Kyrgyzstan. Gondwana Res 21:901–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kröner A, Kovach V, Belousova E, Hegner E, Armstrong R, Dolgopolova A, Seltmann R, Alexeiev DV, Hoffmann JE, Wong J, Sun M, Cai K, Wang T, Tong Y, Wilde SA, Degtyarev KE, Rytsk (2013a) Reassessment of continental growth during the accretionary history of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Gondwana Res (in press)Google Scholar
  43. Kröner A, Alexeiev DV, Rojas-Agramonte Y, Hegner E, Wong J, Xia X, Belousova E, Mikolaichuk A, Seltmann R, Liu DY, Kiselev VV (2013b) Mesoproterozoic (Grenville-age) terranes in the Kyrgyz North Tianshan: zircon ages and Nd–Hf isotopic constraints on the origin and evolution of basement blocks in the southern Central Asian Orogen. Gondwana Res 23:272–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kushev VT, Vinogradov DP (1978) Metamorphic eclogites. “Nauka”, Novosibirsk, 112 p 586 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  45. Lagos M, Scherer EE, Tomaschek F, Münker C, Keiter M, Berndt J, Ballhaus C (2007) High precision Lu-Hf geochronology of Eocene eclogite-facies rocks from Syros, Cyclades, Greece. Chem Geol 243:16–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laird J, Albee AL (1981) Pressure, temperature, and time indicator in mafic schists: their implications to reconstructing the polymetamorphic history of Vermont. Am J Sci 281:127–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leake BE, Woolley AR, Arps CES, Birch WD, Gilbert MC, Grice JD, Hawthorne FC, Kato A, Kisch HJ, Krivovichev VG, Linthout K, Laird J, Mandarino JA, Maresch WV, Nickel EH, Rock NMS, Schumacher JC, Smith DC, Stephenson NCN, Ungaretti L, Whittaker EJW, Youzhi G (1997) Nomenclature of amphiboles: report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. Am Mineral 82:1019–1037Google Scholar
  48. Ludwig KR (2001) Isoplot/Ex version 2.49, Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publications 1aGoogle Scholar
  49. Massonne H-J (2001) First find of coesite in the ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic area of the central Erzgebirge, Germany. Eur J Mineral 13:565–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morimoto N (1988) Nomenclature of pyroxene. Am Mineral 73:1123–1133Google Scholar
  51. Münker C, Weyer S, Scherer EE, Mezger K (2001) Separation of high field strength elements (Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf) and Lu from rock samples for MC-ICPMS measurements. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2:1064. doi: 10.1029/2001GC000183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nehring F, Jacob DE, Barth MG, Foley SF (2008) Laser-ablation ICP-MS analysis of siliceous rock glasses fused on an iridium strip heater using MgO dilution. Microchim Acta 160:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O′Brien PJ, Walte N, Li JH (2005) The petrology of two distinct Paleoproterozoic granulite types in the Hengshan Mts., North China craton, and tectonic implications. J Asian Earth Sci 24:615–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Orozbaev RT, Takasu A, Tagiri M, Bakirov AB, Sakiev KS (2007) Polymeta-morphism of Aktyuz eclogites (northern Kyrgyz Tien-Shan) deduced from inclusions in garnets. J Mineral Petrol Sci 102:150–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Orozbaev RT, Takasu A, Bakirov AB, Tagiri M, Sakiev KS (2010) Metamorphic history of eclogites and country rock gneisses in the Aktyuz area, Northern Tien-Shan, Kyrgyzstan: a record from initiation of subduction through to oceanic closure by continent–continent collision. J Metamorph Geol 28:317–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Osmonbetov KO (ed) (1980) Geological map of the Kyrgyz SSR. Leningrad, VSEGEI, scale 1:500 000 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  57. Osmonbetov KO, Knauf VI, Korolev VT (eds) (1982) Strati!ed and Intrusive Formations of Kyrgyzia. Ilim Publishing House, Frunze, p 357 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  58. Peacock SM, Wang K (1999) Seismic consequences of warm versus cool subduction zone metamorphism: examples from northeast and southwest Japan. Science 286:937–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pearce NJG, Perkins WT, Westgate JA, Gorton MP, Jackson SE, Neal CR, Chenery SP (1997) A compilation of new and published major and trace element data for NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612 glass reference materials. Geostand Newsl 21:115–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Powell R, Holland TJB (1994) Optimal geothermometry and geobarometry. Am Mineral 79:120–133Google Scholar
  61. Scherer EE, Cameron KL, Blichert-Toft J (2000) Lu–Hf garnet geochronology: closure temperature relative to the Sm–Nd system and the effects of trace mineral inclusions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:3413–3432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schmidt A, Weyer S, Mezger K, Scherer EE, Xiao Y, Hoefs J, Brey GP (2008) Rapid eclogitisation of the Dabie-Sulu UHP terrane: constraints from Lu–Hf garnet geochronology. Earth Planet Sci Lett 273:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmidt A, Mezger K, O’Brien PJ (2011) The time of eclogite formation in the ultrahigh pressure rocks of the Sulu terrane. Constraints from Lu–Hf garnet geochronology. Lithos 125:743–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scholl DW, von Huene R, Vallier TL, Howell DG (1980) Sedimentary masses and concepts about tectonic processes at underthrust ocean margins. Geology 8:564–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shu Q, Brey GP, Gerdes A, Hoefer HE (2013) Geochronological and geochemical constraints on the formation and evolution of the mantle underneath the Kaapvaal craton: Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd systematics of subcalcic garnets from highly depleted peridotites. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 113:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simonov VA, Kurenkov SA, Shatskiy VS, Mikolaichuk AV, Stupakov SI, Kolmogorov Yu P, Kireev AD, Shakarov OA (2001) Paleogeodynamics and metamorphism of ophiolites of North Tian-Shan. In: Tectonics of Neogey: general and regional aspects. Materials of XXXIV Tectonic conference. Moscow, “Geos”, pp 189–192 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  67. Skora S, Baumgartner LP, Mahlen NJ, Lapen TJ, Johnson CM, Bussy F (2008) Estimation of a maximum Lu diffusion rate in a natural eclogite garnet. Swiss J Geosci 2008:637–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smelov AP, Beryozkin VI (1993) Retrograded eclogites in the Olekma granite-greenstone region, Aldan Shield, Siberia. Precambr Res 62:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smit MA, Scherer EE, Bröcker M, van Roermund HLM (2009) Timing of eclogite facies metamorphism in the southernmost Scandinavian Caledonides by Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology. Contrib Mineral Petrol 159:521–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sobolev NV, Dobretsov NL, Bakirov AB, Shatsky VS (1986) Eclogites from various types of metamorphic complexes in the USSR and the problems of their origin. In: Evans BW, Brown EH (eds) Blueschist and eclogites. Geol Soc Am Memoir 164:349–363Google Scholar
  71. Söderlund U, PcJ Patchett, Vervoort JD, Isachsen CE (2004) The 176Lu decay constant determined by Lu–Hf and U–Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic intrusions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 219:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Storey C (2008) The Glenelg-Attadale Inlier, NW Scotland, with emphasis on the Precambrian high-pressure metamorphic history and subsequent retrogression: an introduction and review. Scott J Geol 44:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tagiri M, Yano T, Bakirov AB, Nakajima T, Uchiumi S (1995) Mineral parageneses and metamorphic P–T path of ultrahigh-pressure eclogites from Kyrgyzstan, Tien-Shan. Isl Arc 4:280–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tagiri M, Takiguchi S, Ishida C, Noguchi T, Kimura M, Bakirov A, Sakiev K, Takahashi M, Takasu A, Bakirov A, Togonbaeva A, Suzuki A (2010) Intrusion of UHP metamorphic rocks into the upper crust of Kyrgyzian Tien-Shan: P–T path and metamorphic age of the Makbal complex. J Mineral Petrol Sci 105:233–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Togonbaeva A, Takasu A, Bakirov AA, Sakurai T, Tagiri M, Bakirov AB, Sakiev K (2009) CHIME monazite ages of garnet-chloritoid-talk schists in the Makbal complex, Northern Kyrgyz Tien-Shan: first report of the age of the UHP metamorphism. J Mineral Petrol Sci 104:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Togonbaeva A, Takasu A, Tagiri M, Bakirov AB, Bakirov AA, Sakiev K (2010) New described eclogites from the Neldy Formation, Makbal district, Northern Tien-Shan, Kyrgyzstan. J Mineral Petrol Sci 105:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Torres-Roldán RL, García-Casco A, García-Sánchez PA (2000) CSpace: an integrated workplace for the graphical and algebraic analysis of phase assemblages on 32-bit Wintel platforms. Computers Geosci 26:779–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Van Orman JA, Grove TL, Shimizu N, Graham DL (2002) Rare earth element diffusion in a natural pyrope single crystal at 2.8 GPa. Contrib Mineral Petrol 142:416–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang X, Liou JG (1991) Regional ultrahigh-pressure coesite-bearing eclogitic terrane in central China: evidence from country rocks, gneiss, marble, and metapelite. Geology 19:933–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zheng Y-F, Ye K, Zhang L-F (2009) Developing the plate tectonics from oceanic subduction to continental collision. Chin Sci Bull 54:2549–2555CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yamirka Rojas-Agramonte
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Daniel Herwartz
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Antonio García-Casco
    • 6
  • Alfred Kröner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dmitriy V. Alexeiev
    • 7
  • Reiner Klemd
    • 8
  • Stephan Buhre
    • 1
  • Matthias Barth
    • 1
  1. 1.Beijing SHRIMP Centre, Institute of GeologyChinese Academy of Geological SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institut für GeowissenschaftenJohannes Gutenberg-UniversitätMainzGermany
  3. 3.Steinmann-InstitutUniversität BonnBonnGermany
  4. 4.Institut für Geologie und MineralogieUniversität zu KölnKölnGermany
  5. 5.Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum, Abteilung IsotopengeologieGeorg-August-UniversitätGöttingenGermany
  6. 6.Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la TierraUniversidad de Granada-CSICGranadaSpain
  7. 7.Geological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  8. 8.GeoZentrum NordbayernUniversität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations