Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 162, Issue 1, pp 193–208 | Cite as

The interaction of migrating grain boundaries with fluid inclusions in rock analogues: the effect of wetting angle and fluid inclusion velocity

Original Paper

Abstract

The distribution of fluids in grain boundaries, fluid inclusion morphology and kinetics have important effects on the evolution of microstructure and transport properties and should be understood for correct interpretations for studies of thermobarometry and paleorheology. We compare results of in situ annealing experiments on rock analogues in the presence of different pore fluids in transmitted light: bischofite with saturated brine, camphor with ethanol, and camphor with ethylene glycol. The solid–liquid systems vary in terms of wettability and solubility, while homologous temperatures, strain rates, annealing times, and the initial textures are similar. In agreement with earlier work and theory, we observe different types of grain boundary–fluid inclusion interaction at sufficiently low grain boundary velocity such as drag and drop, necking, and the break up into arrays of smaller inclusions. In all three systems the maximum possible velocity of a fluid inclusion being dragged by a moving grain boundary is dependent on the fluid inclusion size. We interpret this to reflect the fluid inclusion mobility, and compare the trend with theoretical models which suggest that for all three systems the rate-limiting process is bulk diffusion and not surface diffusion or solution-precipitation.

Keywords

Fluid inclusions Grain boundary migration Wetting angle In situ experiments Fluid inclusion velocity 

References

  1. Anthony TR, Cline HE (1971) Thermal migration of liquid droplets through solids. J Appl Phys 42(9):3380–3388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin NJ, Evans B (2007) Paleowattmeters: A scaling relation for dynamically recrystallized grain size. Geology 35(4):343–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker RJ (1992) On modifications of fluid inclusions in quartz. Re-equilibration experiments and thermodynamic calculations on fluids in natural quartz. Unpublished PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, pp 189Google Scholar
  4. Bauer P, Palm S, Handy MR (2000) Strain localization and fluid pathways in mylonite: inferences from in situ deformation of a water-bearing quartz analogue (norcamphor). Tectonophysics 320(2):141–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker JK, Bons PD, Jessell MW (2008) A new front-tracking method to model anisotropic grain and phase boundary motion in rocks. Comput Geosci 34(3):201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bons PD (1993) Experimental deformation of polyphase rock analogues. Unpublished PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, pp 207Google Scholar
  7. Bons PD, Urai JL (1992) Syndeformational grain-growth—microstructures and kinetics. J Struct Geol 14(8–9):1101–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boullier AM (1999) Fluid inclusions: tectonic indicators. J Struct Geol 21(8–9):1229–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boullier AM, Michot G, Pecher A, Barrés O (1989) Diffusion and/or plastic deformation around fluid inclusions in synthetic quartz: new investigations. In: Bridgwater D (ed) Fluid movements—element transport and the composition of the deep crust. Dordrecht, pp 345–360Google Scholar
  10. Brodhag SH, Herwegh M (in press) The effect of different second-phase particle regimes on grain growth in two-phase aggregates: insights from in situ rock analogue experiments. Contrib Mineral PetrolGoogle Scholar
  11. Brook RJ (1969) Pore-grain boundary interactions and grain growth. J Am Ceram Soc 52(1):56–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chuang T-J, Kagawa KI, Rice JR, Sills LB (1979) Non-equilibrium models for diffusive cavitation of grain interfaces. Acta Metallurgica 27(3):265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drury MR, Urai JL (1990) Deformation-related recrystallization processes. Tectonophysics 172(3–4):235–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitz Gerald JD, Mancktelow NS, Pennacchioni G, Kunze K (2006) Ultrafine-grained quartz mylonites from high-grade shear zones: evidence for strong dry middle to lower crust, vol 34, p 369. Geology 34(8):704Google Scholar
  15. Gottstein G (2004) Physical foundations of material sciences. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottstein G, Shvindlerman LS (1993) Theory of grain boundary motion in the presence of mobile particles. Acta Metallurgica Materialia 41(11):3267–3275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gratier JP, Jenatton L (1984) Deformation by solution-deposition, and re-equilibration of fluid inclusions in crystals depending on temperature, internal pressure and stress. J Struct Geol 6(1):189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herwegh M, Berger A (2004) Deformation mechanisms in second-phase affected microstructures and their energy balance. J Struct Geol 26(8):1483–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herwegh M, Kunze K (2002) The influence of nano-scale second-phase particles on deformation of fine grained calcite mylonites. J Struct Geol 24(9):1463–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickman SH, Evans B (1991) Experimental pressure solution in halite: the effect of grain/interphase boundary structure. J Geol Soc Lond 148:549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holness MB (1993) Temperature and pressure-dependence of quartz aqueous fluid dihedral angles—the control of adsorbed H2O on the permeability of quartzites. Earth Planet Sci Lett 117(3–4):363–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsueh CH, Evans AG, Coble RL (1982) Microstructure development during final intermediate stage sintering 1. Pore grain-boundary separation. Acta Metall 30(7):1269–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (1996) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena. Pergamon, pp 497Google Scholar
  24. Jessell MW, Kostenko O, Jamtveit B (2003) The preservation potential of microstructures during static grain growth. J Metamorph Geol 21(5):481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson EL, Hollister LS (1995) Syndeformational fluid trapping in quartz—determining the pressure–temperature conditions of deformation from fluid inclusions and the formation of pure CO2 fluid inclusions during grain-boundary migration. J Metamorph Geol 13(2):239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karato S-J (1989) Grain growth kinetics in olivine aggregates. Tectonophysics 168:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerrich R (1976) Some effects of tectonic recrystallization on fluid inclusions in quartz veins. Contrib Mineral Petrol 59:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kronenberg AK, Tullis J (1984) Flow strengths of quartz aggregates: grain size and pressure effects due to hydrolytic weakening. J Geophys Res 89:4281–4297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu S, Teng J, Choi J (2007) Determination of solute diffusion coefficient by the droplet migration method. Metall Mater Trans A 38(7):1555–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Means WD (1989) Synkinematic microscopy of transparent polycrystals. J Struct Geol 11(1–2):163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olgaard DL, Evans B (1986) Effect of 2nd-phase particles on grain-growth in calcite. J Am Ceram Soc 69(11):C272–C277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olgaard DL, Evans B (1988) Grain-growth in synthetic marbles with added mica and water. Contrib Mineral Petrol 100(2):246–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petrishcheva E, Renner J (2005) Two-dimensional analysis of pore drag and drop. Acta Mater 53(9):2793–2803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Post A, Tullis J (1998) The rate of water penetration in experimentally deformed quartzite, implications for hydrolytic weakening. Tectonophysics 295(1–2):117–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raabe D (1995) On the orientation dependence of static recovery in low-carbon steels. Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia 33(5):735–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Renner J, Evans B, Hirth G (2002) Grain growth and inclusion formation in partially molten carbonate rocks. Contrib Mineral Petrol 142(5):501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rutter EH (1976) Kinetics of rock deformation by pressure solution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser Math Phys Eng Sci 283(1312):203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schenk O, Urai JL (2004) Microstructural evolution and grain boundary structure during static recrystallization in synthetic polycrystals of sodium chloride containing saturated brine. Contrib Mineral Petrol 146(6):671–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schenk O, Urai JL (2005) The migration of fluid-filled grain boundaries in recrystallizing synthetic bischofite: first results of in situ high-pressure, high-temperature deformation experiments in transmitted light. J Metamorph Geol 23(8):695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schleder Z, Urai JL (2007) Deformation and recrystallization mechanisms in mylonitic shear zones in naturally deformed extrusive Eocene-Oligocene rocksalt from Eyvanekey plateau and Garmsar hills (Central Iran). J Struct Geol 29(2):241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmatz J, Urai JL (2010) The interaction of fluid inclusions and migrating grain boundaries in a rock analogue: deformation and annealing of polycrystalline camphor–ethanol mixtures. J Metamorph Geol 28(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schoenherr L, Urai LL, Kukla PA, Littke R, Schleder Z, Larroque JM, Newall MJ, Al-Abry N, Al-Siyabi HA, Rawahi Z (2007) Limits to the sealing capacity of rock salt: a case study of the infra-Cambrian Ara Salt from the South Oman salt basin. AAPG Bull 91(11):1541–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith CS (1948) Grains, phases, and interfaces—an interpretation of microstructure. Trans Am Inst Min Metall Eng 175:15–51Google Scholar
  44. Spiers CJ, Schutjens P (1990) Densification of crystalline aggregates by fluid-phase diffusional creep. In: Barber DJ, Meredith PD (eds) Deformation processes in minerals, ceramics and rocks. Unwin Hyman, pp 334–353Google Scholar
  45. Spiers CJ, Urai J, Lister GS, Boland JN, Zwart HJ (1986) The influence of fluid-rock interaction on the rheology of salt rock and on ionic transport in the salt. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, p 132Google Scholar
  46. Svoboda J, Riedel H (1992) Pore-boundary interactions and evolution-equations for the porosity and the grain-size during sintering. Acta Metallurgica Et Materialia 40(11):2829–2840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ter Heege JH, De Bresser JHP, Spiers CJ (2005) Dynamic recrystallization of wet synthetic polycrystalline halite: dependence of grain size distribution on flow stress, temperature and strain. Tectonophysics 396(1–2):35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tullis J, Yund RA (1982) Grain-growth kinetics of quartz and calcite aggregates. J Geol 90(3):301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Twiss RJ (1977) Theory and applicability of a recrystallized grain-size paleopiezometer. Pure Appl Geophys 115(1–2):227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Urai JL (1983) Water assisted dynamic recrystallization and weakening in polycrystalline bischofite. Tectonophysics 96(1–2):125–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Urai JL (1987) Development of microstructure during deformation of carnallite and bischofite in transmitted light. Tectonophysics 135(1–3):251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Urai JL, Humphreys FJ (1981) The development of shear zones in polycrystalline camphor. Tectonophysics 78(1–4):677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Urai JL, Spiers CJ, Zwart HJ, Lister GS (1986) Weakening of rock salt by water during long-term creep. Nature 324(6097):554–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walte NP, Bons PD, Passchier CW, Koehn D (2003) Disequilibrium melt distribution during static recrystallization. Geology 31(11):1009–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walte NP, Bons PD, Passchier CW (2005) Deformation of melt-bearing systems—insight from in situ grain-scale analogue experiments. J Struct Geol 27(9):1666–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Watanabe T, Peach CJ (2002) Electrical impedance measurement of plastically deforming halite rocks at 125 C and 50 MPa. J Geophys Res 107(B1):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watson EB, Brenan JM (1987) Fluids in the lithosphere. 1. Experimentally-determined wetting characteristics of CO2-H2O fluids and their implications for fluid transport, host-rock physical-properties, and fluid inclusion formation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 85(4):497–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics, Geological InstituteRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Schlumberger Center of Excellence for Petroleum Systems ModelingAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations