Erratum to: Zircon-scale insights into the history of a Supervolcano, Bishop Tuff, Long Valley, California, with implications for the Ti-in-zircon geothermometer
- 480 Downloads
Erratum to: Contrib Mineral Petrol DOI: 10.1007/s00410-010-0532-0
Unfortunately, several errors related to the figure captions are detected in the original version of the online published article.
The figure caption in Fig. 1 mentions that the symbols are color-coded in the same way as symbols in Figs. 3, 4, and 7, but this should read Figs. 3, 4, and 8 instead. The correct Fig. 1 caption is given below.
Fig. 1 Location map for the Bishop Tuff in eastern California, USA. Stratigraphic columns show sequences of fall (F) and ignimbrites (Ig) in the eastern and northern Bishop Tuff recognized by Wilson and Hildreth (1997). Relative stratigraphic positions of the samples studied here are indicated with units color-coded in the same way as symbols in Figs. 3, 4, and 8. Representative temperatures are shown in Fig. 3. Modified after Wilson and Hildreth (1997) and Hildreth and Wilson (2007).
The figure caption in Fig. 4 mentions that the colors are keyed to eruption sequence as in Fig. 4, but this should read Fig. 3 instead. In addition, the dashed lines in the figures should have been identified as enclosing compositional ranges obtained for the “BT mount” from the Watson et al. (2006) study. The correct Fig. 4 caption is given below.
Fig. 4 Covariations between a Ti, b Eu/Eu*, c Nd/Yb, and d Sm with Zr/Hf. Dashed lines enclose the compositional ranges obtained in this study on the “BT mount” from the Watson et al. (2006) study (see text for details). A typical 1 SD uncertainty in Ti content is illustrated. Labeled arrows suggest processes that could account for the observed covariations (xl. = crystallization) with “?” symbols indicating processes in addition to zircon fractionation, which decreases Zr/Hf. Relationship of Sm to Zr/Hf is typical of that of the Y + REE with respect to Zr/Hf with the caveats that in the IDs; Ce defines a more pronounced negative trend, and the Y + HREE tend to cluster at concentrations similar to somewhat higher than those of the rims. Rims: solid symbols; IDs: open symbols. Colors keyed to eruption sequence as in Fig. 3.
The figure caption in Fig. 8 mentions that the symbols are the same as those in Fig. 5. It should read Fig. 3 instead. The correct Fig. 8 caption is given below.
Fig. 8 Covariations between a Sm, b Y, c Th, d Nd/Yb, e Zr/Hf, and f ∆Ti with ∑REE3+:P in excess of that expected for ideal xenotime ((Y,REE3+)PO4) substitution (i.e., molar [(Y, REE3+):P] − 1). Delta Ti is the deviation in Ti for a given Zr/Hf from that expected from the linear Ti–Zr/Hf covariation defined by zircon rims (~80% of rims are within analytical uncertainty at 2 SD of this correlation, and we treat this trend as a “normal” liquid line of descent). Symbols as in Fig. 3 except that those that are dashed are IDs for which anomalously high Ti was independently suspected on the basis of apparently anomalously high Fe. See text for additional details.