Advertisement

Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 154, Issue 2, pp 153–170 | Cite as

Calcium diffusivity in alumino-silicate garnets: an experimental and ATEM study

  • D. Vielzeuf
  • A. Baronnet
  • A. L. Perchuk
  • D. Laporte
  • M. B. Baker
Original Paper

Abstract

Concentration gradients in calcium are common in metamorphic or magmatic garnets and can be used to determine the timescales of geological processes. However, the kinetics of Ca diffusion in garnet is poorly constrained and experimental studies have to date yielded widely varying diffusion coefficients. In this paper, we describe a new method for generating diffusion profiles in garnet. We incorporated polished and compositionally homogeneous garnet seeds in a finely ground powder of clinopyroxene and garnet. During the experiments (1.3 GPa, 1,050–1,250°C, and ƒO2 ≤ the graphite-O2 buffer), the mineral powder partially melted, recrystallized, and formed a 10–50 μm wide overgrowth zone of compositionally distinct garnet around the seeds. Long duration experiments generated measurable relaxation profiles at these seed/overgrowth interfaces. We performed analytical transmission electron microscope traverses across the interfaces in each experiment. Thirteen usable compositional profiles were obtained with characteristic distances of diffusion ranging from 300 to 1,000 nm. From these profiles, Ca–(Fe, Mg) interdiffusion coefficients were retrieved using an analytical solution for the diffusion equation and the data were cast in an Arrhenius relation. Linear regression of the data yields an activation energy Q Ca–(Fe, Mg) equal to 188 ± 48 kJ mol−1 and a frequency factor D 0 equal to 6.6 × 10−14 m2 s−1. Within the compositional range studied, the composition of garnet has no major effect on the Ca–(Fe, Mg) interdiffusion coefficient. The very slow diffusion rate of Ca is in agreement with natural observations indicating that Ca diffuses more slowly than Fe and Mg. The Ca diffusion coefficients derived from this study are not model-dependent and can be used to determine the durations of geological events from Ca relaxation profiles in natural garnets.

Keywords

Diffusion Couple Interdiffusion Coefficient Diffusion Profile Garnet Composition Uphill Diffusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique—Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers through grants DyETI 2002 and DyETI 2005 to D.Vielzeuf. We thank J.-L. Devidal and F. Faure for their assistance with the electron microprobe and SEM at LMV, and C. Vanni, W. Saikali, and C. Dominici for their help with the FIB at CP2M. The preparation of the polished garnet seeds benefited from techniques developed by J. L. Paquette (LMV). We performed the ATEM analyses at the French Earth Science TEM facility (Marseille and Lille). We thank A. Addad for his supervision during the analytical sessions at Lille, and P. Cordier for the LACBED images published in this paper. K. Benzerara is gratefully acknowledged for performing a preliminary series of Ca, Fe, and Mg mapping of a FIB foil (Dif1) by Scanning Transmission X-ray Microscopy on a Synchrotron source at Berkeley. A portion of this work was done while D.V. was at Caltech for a year as part of a CNRS/Caltech exchange; E. M. Stolper is gratefully acknowledged for his financial support. A.L. Perchuk acknowledges Université Blaise Pascal for providing a 4-month Visiting Professor position at LMV—Clermont-Ferrand, and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research for financial support (project 06-05-65204). This paper benefited from suggestions by B. Devouard, discussions with P. Asimow, and formal reviews by C.S. Schwandt and S. Chakraborty.

References

  1. Adda Y, Philibert J (1966) La diffusion dans les solides. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1225 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaoui HC, Kornprobst J, Laporte D (1997) Inconsistencies between cpx-grt geothermometry and field observations: example of the peraluminous eclogites from Beni Bousera (North Morocco). Terra Nova 9:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres M, Vance D (1997) A comparative study of diffusion profiles in Himalayan and Dalradian garnets: constraints on diffusion data and the relative duration of the metamorphic events. Contrib Mineral Petrol 128:66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady JB (1995) Diffusion data for silicate minerals, glasses, and liquids. In: Ahrens TJ (ed) Mineral physics and crystallography. A handbook of physical constants. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 269–290Google Scholar
  5. Buening DK, Buseck PR (1973) Fe–Mg lattice diffusion in olivine. J Geophys Res 78:6852–6862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson WD (2002) Scales of disequilibrium and rates of equilibration during metamorphism. Am Mineral 87:185–204Google Scholar
  7. Carlson WD (2006) Rates of Fe, Mg, Mn, and Ca diffusion in garnet. Am Mineral 91:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty S, Dingwell DB, Rubie DC (1995) Multicomponent diffusion in ternary silicate melts in the system K2O–Al2O3–SiO2: I. Experimental measurements. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborty S, Ganguly J (1991) Compositional zoning and cation diffusion in garnets. In: Ganguly J (eds) Diffusion, atomic ordering and mass transport. Advances in physical geochemistry, vol 8. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 120–175Google Scholar
  10. Chakraborty S, Ganguly J (1992) Cation diffusion in aluminosilicate garnets: experimental determination in spessartine-almandine diffusion couples, evaluation of effective binary diffusion coefficients, and applications. Contrib Mineral Petrol 111:74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chakraborty S, Rubie DC (1996) Mg tracer diffusion in aluminosilicate garnets at 750-850°C, 1 atm. and 1300°C, 8.5 GPa. Contrib Mineral Petrol 122:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherns D, Morniroli JP (1994) Analysis of partial and stair-rod dislocations by large-angle convergent-beam electron-diffraction. Ultramicroscopy 53:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cliff G, Lorimer GW (1975) The quantitative analysis of thin specimens. J Microsc 103:203–207Google Scholar
  14. Cordier P, Morniroli JP, Cherns D (1995) Characterization of crystal defects in quartz by large-angle convergent beam electron diffraction. Philos Mag A 72:1421–1430Google Scholar
  15. Costa F, Chakraborty S (2004) Decadal time gaps between mafic intrusion and silicic eruption obtained from chemical zoning patterns in olivine. Earth Planet Sci Lett 227:517–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn. Clarendon, Oxford, UK, 414 pGoogle Scholar
  17. Cygan RT, Lasaga AC (1985) Self-diffusion of magnesium in garnet at 750°C to 900°C. Am J Sci 285:328–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dachs E, Proyer A (2002) Constraints on the duration of high-pressure metamorphism in the Tauern Window from diffusion modeling of discontinuous growth zones in eclogite garnet. J Metamorphic Geol 20:769–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dempster TJ (1985) Garnet zoning and metamorphism of the Barrovian type area, Scotland. Contrib Mineral Petrol 89:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elphick SC, Ganguly J, Loomis TP (1985) Experimental determination of cation diffusivities in aluminosilicate garnets I. Experimental methods and interdiffusion data. Contrib Mineral Petrol 90:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faryad SW, Chakraborty S (2005) Duration of Eo-Alpine metamorphic events obtained from multicomponent diffusion modelling of garnet: a case study from the Eastern Alps. Contrib Mineral Petrol 150:306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freer R, Edwards A (1999) An experimental study of Ca–(Fe,Mg) interdiffusion in silicate garnets. Contrib Mineral Petrol 134:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ganguly J (2002) Diffusion kinetics in minerals: principles and applications to tectono-metamorphic processes. EMU notes in Mineralogy, 4(chapter 10):271–309Google Scholar
  24. Ganguly J, Cheng W, Chakraborty S (1998) Cation diffusion in aluminosilicate garnets: experimental determination in pyrope-almandine diffusion couples. Contrib Mineral Petrol 131:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gerasimov VY (1987) Experimental study on Mg-Fe interdiffusion in garnets. Trans USSR Acad Sci 295:684–668Google Scholar
  26. Glicksman ME (2000) Diffusion in solids. Wiley, New York, 498 pGoogle Scholar
  27. Haase CS, Chadam J, Feinn D, Ortoleva P (1980) Oscillatory zoning in plagioclase feldspar. Science 209:272–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkaldy JS, Young DJ (1987) Diffusion in the condensed state. The Institute of Metals, London, 527 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Kohn MJ (2004) Oscillatory- and sector-zoned garnets record cyclic (?) rapid thrusting in central Nepal. Geochem Geophys Geosys, 5, 12, doi:10.1029/2004GC000737Google Scholar
  30. Krogh TE (1982) Improved accuracy of U-Pb zircon ages by the creation of more concordant systems using an air abrasion technique. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 46:637–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lasaga AC (1979) Multicomponent exchange and diffusion in silicates. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 43:455–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leyreloup A, Dupuy C, Andriambololona R (1977) Catazonal xenoliths in French Neogene volcanic rocks; constitution of the lower crust; 2: chemical composition and consequences of the evolution of the French Massif Central precambrian crust. Contrib Mineral Petrol 62:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loomis TP (1978) Multicomponent diffusion in garnet: II. Comparison of models with natural data. Am J Sci 278:1119–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loomis TP (1983) Compositional zoning of crystals: a record of growth and reaction history. In: Saxena SK (ed) Kinetics and equilibrium in mineral reactions (Advances in physical geochemistry, vol 3). Springer, New York, pp 1–60Google Scholar
  35. Loomis TP, Ganguly J, Elphick SC (1985) Experimental determination of cation diffusivities in aluminosilicate garnets II. Multicomponent simulation and tracer diffusion coefficients. Contrib Mineral Petrol 90:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorimer GW, Cliff G (1976) Analytical electron microscopy of minerals. In: Wenk HR (ed) Electron microscopy in mineralogy. Springer, Berlin, pp 506–519Google Scholar
  37. Meissner E, Sharp TG, Chakraborty S (1998) Quantitative measurement of short compositional profiles using analytical transmission electron microscopy. Am Mineral 83:546–552Google Scholar
  38. Morniroli JP, Cordier P, van Cappellen E, Zuo JM, Spence J (1997) Application of the convergent beam imaging (CBIM) technique to the analysis of crystal defects. Microsc Microanal Microstruct 8:187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patiño Douce A, Johnston AD (1991) Phase equilibria and melt productivity in the pelitic system: implications for the origin of peraluminous granitoids and aluminous granulites. Contrib Mineral Petrol 107:202–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perchuk LL, Lavrent’eva IV (1983) Experimental investigation of exchange equilibria in the system cordierite-garnet-biotite. Adv Phys Geochem 3:199–239Google Scholar
  41. Perchuk A, Philippot P (2000) Geospeedometry and timescales of high-pressure metamorphism. Int Geol Rev 42:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Philippot P, Blichert-Toft J, Perchuk AL, Costa S, Gerasimov VY (2001) Lu-Hf and Ar-Ar geochronology confirms extreme rate of subduction zone metamorphism deduced from geospeedometry. Tectonophysics 342:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwandt CS, Cygan RT, Westrich HR (1995) Mg self-diffusion in pyrope garnet. Am Mineral 80:483–490Google Scholar
  44. Schwandt CS, Cygan RT, Westrich HR (1996) Ca self-diffusion in grossular garnet. Am Mineral 81:448–451Google Scholar
  45. Shannon RD (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic study of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr A 32:751–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tanaka M, Saito R, Ueno K, Harada Y (1980) Large-angle convergent-beam electron-diffraction. J Electron Microsc 29:408–412Google Scholar
  47. Tracy RJ (1982) Compositional zoning and inclusions in metamorphic minerals. In: Ferry JM (ed) Characterization of metamorphism through mineral equilibria (Reviews in mineralogy, vol 10) Mineral. Soc Am Washington, DC, pp 355–397Google Scholar
  48. van Cappellen E, Doukhan JC (1994) Quantitative transmission X-ray microanalysis of ionic compounds. Ultramicroscopy 53:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vielzeuf D, Clemens JD (1992) The fluid-absent melting of phlogopite + quartz: Experiments and models. Am Mineral 77:1206–1222Google Scholar
  50. Vielzeuf D, Holloway JR (1988) Experimental determination of the fluid-absent melting relations in the pelitic system. Contrib Mineral Petrol 98:257–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vielzeuf D, Champenois M, Valley JW, Brunet F, Devidal JL (2005a) SIMS analyses of oxygen isotopes: matrix effects in Fe-Mg-Ca garnets. Chem Geol 223:208–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vielzeuf D, Lupulescu A, Perchuk A, Laporte D, Baronnet A, Addad A (2005b)—Uphill diffusion and zero flux planes in garnets: an experimental and ATEM study. TMS Lett (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society) 2:89–90Google Scholar
  53. Vielzeuf D, Veschambre M, Brunet F (2005c) Oxygen isotope heterogeneities and diffusion profile in composite metamorphic-magmatic garnets from the Pyrenees. Am Mineral 90:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yardley BWD (1977) An empirical study of diffusion in garnet. Am Mineral 62:793–800Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Vielzeuf
    • 1
  • A. Baronnet
    • 1
  • A. L. Perchuk
    • 2
  • D. Laporte
    • 3
  • M. B. Baker
    • 4
  1. 1.CRMCN-CNRSMarseille Cedex 9France
  2. 2.IGEM, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Laboratoire Magmas et VolcansOPGC-UBP-CNRSClermont-FerrandFrance
  4. 4.Division of Geological and Planetary SciencesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations