Advertisement

Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 152, Issue 2, pp 169–186 | Cite as

Effect of faceting on pore geometry in texturally equilibrated rocks: implications for low permeability at low porosity

  • Takashi Yoshino
  • Jonathan D. Price
  • David A. Wark
  • E. Bruce Watson
Original Paper

Abstract

The pore geometry of texturally equilibrated rocks is controlled by the interfacial energy ratio between grain boundaries and solid–liquid boundaries. Faceting at pore walls, which is a common feature of pore networks in rocks, strongly affects the liquid distribution. We investigated the effects of faceting on the equilibrium pore geometries based on image analysis of several systems with various degrees of faceting and dihedral angles. The degree of faceting was assessed by the F value, which is the ratio of the flat interface length at the pore wall to the length of total interfacial boundary between solid and liquid. The F values tend to increase with increasing liquid volume fraction. Little-faceted systems show relatively homogeneous liquid distribution. Moderately-faceted systems with a higher dihedral angle (∼55°) are characterized by development of large pores surrounded by faceted walls and complementary shrinkage of triple junction tubes, whereas strongly faceted systems with a low dihedral angle show no evidence of shrinking triple junction tubes, although most pores are surrounded by faceted pore walls. The faceted systems tend to produce more facet boundaries at the pore walls due to the difference of interfacial energies between the flat and curved surfaces. In the systems with the same degree of faceting, heterogeneity of liquid distribution tends to decrease with dihedral angle. For faceting systems, the permeability of texturally equilibrated rocks with low liquid fraction would be significantly decreased by the relative reduction of triple junction volumes or by closure of channels along grain edge due to the truncation of facet walls.

Keywords

Dihedral Angle Interfacial Energy Pore Wall Triple Junction Polished Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Y. Liang, Y. Takei and T. Hatakeyama for discussion. The comments of anonymous reviewer and U. H. Faul adided in improving the manuscript. This work was supported by the Research Fellowships to T. Y. from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. Experiments and analyses at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute were supported by U.S. Department of Energy grant no. DE-FG02-94ER1443 to E.B. Watson.

References

  1. Bennema P, van der Eerden JP (1987) Crystal graphs, connected nets, roughening transition and the morphology of the crystals. In: Sunagawa I (ed) Mophology of crystals. Terra Scientific Publishing Co, Tokyo, pp 1–77Google Scholar
  2. Bourbié T, Zinszner B (1985) Hydraulic and acoustic properties as a function of porosity in Fontainebleau sandstone. J Geophys Res 90:1524–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bulau JR, Waff HS, Tyburczy JA (1979) Mechanical and thermodynamic constraints on fluid distribution in partial melts. J Geophys Res 84:6102–6108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheadle MJ, Elliot MT, McKenzie D (2004) Percolation threshold and permeability of crystallizing igneous rocks: the importance of textural equilibrium. Geology 32:757–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahmen U, Xiao SQ, Paciornik S, Johnson E, Johansen A (1997) Magic-size equilibrium shapes of nanoscale Pb inclusions in Al. Phys Rev Let 78:471–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cmíral M, Fitz Gerald JD, Faul UH, Green DH (1998) A close look at dihedral angles and melt geometry in olivine-basalt aggregates: a TEM study. Contrib Mineral Petrol 130:336–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faul UH, Toomey DR, Waff HS (1994) Intergranular basaltic melt is distributed in thin, elongated inclusions. Geophys Res Lett 21:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faul UH (1997) Permeability of partially molten upper mantle rocks from experiments and percolation theory. J Geophys Res 102:10299–10311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faul UH (2001) Melt retention and segregation beneath mid-ocean ridges. Nature 410:920–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garbrisch H, Kjeldgaard L, Johnson E, Dahmen U (2001) Equilibrium shape and interface roughening of small liquid Pb inclusions in solid Al. Acta Material 49:4259–4269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herring C (1951) Some theorems on the free energies of crystal surfaces. Phys Rev 82:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herring C (1953) The use of classical macroscopic concepts in surface-energy problems. In: Gomer R, Smith CS (eds) Structure and properties of solid surfaces. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 5Google Scholar
  13. Jayaprakash C, Rottman C, Saam WF (1984) Simple model for crystal shapes: step–step interactions and facet edges. Phys Rev B 30:6549–6554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jurewicz SR, Watson EB (1985) The distribution of partial melt in a granitic system: the application of liquid phase sintering theory. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 49:1109–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karato S (1989) Grain growth kinetics of olivine aggregates. Tectnophysics 168:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laporte D (1994) Wetting behavior of partial melts during crustal anatexis: the distribution of hydrous silicic melts in polycrystalline aggregates of quartz. Contrib Mineral Petrol 116:486–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laporte D, Provost A (2000) The grain-scale distribution of silicate, carbonate and metallosulfide partial melts: a review of theory and experiments. In: Bagdassalov N, Laporet D, Thompson AB (eds) Physics and chemistry of partially molten rocks. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 93–140Google Scholar
  18. Laporte D, Watson EB (1995) Experimental and theoretical constraints on melt distribution in crustal sources: the effect of crystalline anisotropy on melt connecticity. Chem Geol 124:161–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang Y, Price JD, Wark DA, Watson EB (2001) Nonlinear pressure diffusion in a porous medium: approximate solutions with applications to permeability measurements using transient pulse decay method. J Geophys Res 85:5173–5189Google Scholar
  20. Lifshitz IM, Slyozov VV (1961) The kinetics of precipitation from supersaturated solid solutions. J Phys Chem Solids 19:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullins WW, Rohrer GS (2000) Nucleation barrier for volume-conserving shape changes of faceted crystals. J Am Ceram Soc 83:214–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park HH, Yoon DN (1985) Effect of dihedral angle on the morphology of grains in a matrix phase. Metall Trans A 16:923–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Price JD, Wark DA, Watson EB, Smith AM (2006) Grain-scale permeabilities of faceted polycrystalline aggregates. Geofluids (in press)Google Scholar
  24. Takahashi E (1986) Melting of a dry peridotite KLB-1 up to 14 GPa: implications on the origin of the peridotitic upper mantle. J Geophys Res 91:9367–9382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toramaru A, Fujii N (1986) Connectivity of melt phase in a partially molten peridotite. J Geophys Res 91:9239–9252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. von Bargen N, Waff HS (1986) Permeabilities, interfacial areas and curvatures of partially molten systems: results of numerical computations of equilibrium microstructures. J Geophys Res 91:9261–9276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waff HS, Bulau JR (1979) Equilibrium fluid distribution in an ultramafic partial melt under hydrostatic stress conditions. J Geophys Res 84:6109–6114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Waff HS, Faul U (1992) Effects of crystalline anisotropy on fluid distribution in ultramafic melts. J Geophys Res 97:9003–9014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wagner C (1961) Theorie der altering von niederschlagen durch umlosen (Ostwald Reifung). Z Electrochem 65:581Google Scholar
  30. Wark DA, Watson EB (1998) Grain-scale permeabilities of texturally equilibrated, monomineralic rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 164:591–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wark DA, Watson EB (2000) Effect of grain size on the distribution and transport of deep-seated fluids and melts. Geophys Res Lett 27:2029–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wark DA, Williams CA, Watson EB, Price JD (2003) Reassessment of pore shapes in microstructurally equilibrated rocks, with implications for permeability of the upper mantle. J Geophys Res 108(B1):2050, doi:10.1029/2001JB001575Google Scholar
  33. Warren R (1968) Microstructural development during the liquid-phase sintering of two-phase alloys, with special reference to the NbC/Co system. J Mater Sci 3:471–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Watson EB (1999) Lithologic partitioning of fluids and melts. Am Mineral 84:1693–1710Google Scholar
  35. Watson EB, Brenan JM (1987) Fluids in the lithosphere, 1. Experimentally-determined wetting characteristics of CO2–H2O fluids and their implications for fluid transport, host-rock physical properties, and fluid inclusion formation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 85:497–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watson EB, Lupulescu A (1993) Aqueous fluid connectivity and chemical transport in clinopyroxene-rich rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 117:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoshino T, Takei Y, Wark DA, Watson EB (2005) Grain boundary wetness of texturally equilibrated rocks, with implications for seismic properties of upper mantle. J Geophys Res 110:B08025, doi:10.1029/2004JB003544Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Yoshino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonathan D. Price
    • 1
  • David A. Wark
    • 1
  • E. Bruce Watson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Study of the Earth’s InteriorOkayama UniversityTottoriJapan

Personalised recommendations