Advertisement

Lung

pp 1–8 | Cite as

Proof of Concept: Very Rapid Tidal Breathing Nasal Nitric Oxide Sampling Discriminates Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia from Healthy Subjects

  • Mathias G. Holgersen
  • June K. Marthin
  • Kim G. NielsenEmail author
AIRWAY BIOLOGY

Abstract

Introduction

Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) is extremely low in individuals with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) and is recommended as part of early workup. We investigated whether tidal breathing sampling for a few seconds was as discriminative between PCD and healthy controls (HC) as conventional tidal breathing sampling (cTB-nNO) for 20–30 s.

Methods

We performed very rapid sampling of tidal breathing (vrTB-nNO) for 2, 4 and 6 s, respectively. Vacuum sampling with applied negative pressure (vrTB-nNOvac; negative pressure was applied by pinching the sampling tube) for < 2 s resulted in enhanced suction of nasal air during measurement. Feasibility, success rate, discriminatory capacity, repeatability and agreement were assessed for all four sampling modalities.

Results

We included 13 patients with PCD, median (IQR) age of 21.8 (12.2–27.7) years and 17 HC, 25.3 (14.5–33.4) years. Measurements were highly feasible (96.7% success rate). Measured NO values with vrTB-nNO modalities differed significantly from TB-nNO measurements (HC: p < 0.001, PCD: p < 0.05). All modalities showed excellent discrimination. The vacuum method gave remarkably high values of nNO in both groups (1865 vs. 86 ppb), but retained excellent discrimination. vrTB-nNO4sec, vrTB-nNO6sec and vrTB-nNOvac showed identical specificity to cTB-nNO (all: 1.0, 95% CI 0.77–1.0).

Conclusion

vrTB-nNO sampling requires only a few seconds of probe-in-nose time, is feasible, and provides excellent discrimination between PCD and HC. Rapid TB-nNO sampling needs standardisation and further investigations in infants, young children and patients referred for PCD workup.

Keywords

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Nasal nitric oxide Rare lung diseases 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

KGN and JKM are members of BEAT-PCD (COST Action BM1407). KGN is partly financially supported by The Children’s Lung Foundation. MGH declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Committee on Health Research Ethics in the Capital Region of Denmark in March 2017 [Journal No. H-17002138].

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants, and their parents and/or guardians when necessary, included in the study prior to enrollment.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

408_2019_202_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary table (DOCX 19 KB)
408_2019_202_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (67.8 mb)
Supplementary video (MP4 69399 KB)
408_2019_202_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (224 kb)
Supplementary figures (PDF 224 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Knowles M, Zariwala M, Leigh M (2016) Primary ciliary dyskinesia. Clin Chest Med 37(3):449–461CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown D, Pittman J, Leigh M, Fordham L, Davis S (2008) Early lung disease in young children with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Pediatr Pulmonol 43(5):514–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marthin J, Petersen N, Skovgaard L, Nielsen K (2010) Lung function in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia: a cross-sectional and 3-decade longitudinal study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181(11):1262–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goutaki M, Meier A, Halbeisen F, Lucas J, Dell S, Maurer E et al (2016) Clinical manifestations in primary ciliary dyskinesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 48(4):1081–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Behan L, Dimitrov BD, Kuehni CE, Hogg C, Carroll M, Evans HJ et al (2016) PICADAR: a diagnostic predictive tool for primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J 47(4):1103–1112CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuehni C, Frischer T, Strippoli M, Maurer E, Bush A, Nielsen K et al (2010) Factors influencing age at diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia in European children. Eur Respir J 36(6):1248–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Behan L, Dunn Galvin A, Rubbo B, Masefield S, Copeland F, Manion M et al (2016) Diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: an international patient perspective. Eur Respir J 48(4):1096–1107CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shapiro A, Davis S, Polineni D, Manion M, Rosenfeld M, Dell S et al (2018) Diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. An official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 197(12):1535–4970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lucas J, Barbato A, Collins S, Goutaki M, Behan L, Caudri D et al (2017) European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J.  https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01090-2016 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beydon N, Chambellan A, Alberti C, de Blic J, Clement A, Escudier E et al (2015) Technical and practical issues for tidal breathing measurements of nasal nitric oxide in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 50(12):1374–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marthin J, Nielsen K (2011) Choice of nasal nitric oxide technique as first-line test for primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J 37(3):559–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society (2005) ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171(8):912–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leigh M, Hazucha M, Chawla K, Baker B, Shapiro A, Brown D et al (2013) Standardizing nasal nitric oxide measurement as a test for primary ciliary dyskinesia. Ann Am Thorac Soc 10(6):574–581CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shapiro A, Josephson M, Rosenfeld M, Yilmaz O, Davis S, Polineni D et al (2017) Accuracy of nasal nitric oxide measurement as a diagnostic test for primary ciliary dyskinesia. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14(7):1184–1196PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marthin J, Philipsen M, Rosthoj S, Nielsen K (2018) Infant nasal nitric oxide over time: natural evolution and impact of respiratory tract infection. Eur Respir J.  https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02503-2017 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mateos-Corral D, Coombs R, Grasemann H, Ratjen F, Dell SD (2011) Diagnostic value of nasal nitric oxide measured with non-velum closure techniques for children with primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Pediatr 159(3):420–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knowles M, Ostrowski L, Leigh M, Sears PR, Davis S, Wolf W et al (2014) Mutations in RSPH1 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with a unique clinical and ciliary phenotype. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189(6):707–717CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frommer A, Hjeij R, Loges N, Edelbusch C, Jahnke C, Raidt J et al (2015) Immunofluorescence analysis and diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia with radial spoke defects. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 53(4):563–573CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lowry R. Clinical calculator 1 2001. http://vassarstats.net/clin1.html. Accessed 1 Jun 2018
  20. 20.
    Krouwer J (2008) Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y + X)/2 when X is a reference method. Stat Med 27(5):778–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marthin J, Nielsen K (2013) Hand-held tidal breathing nasal nitric oxide measurement a promising targeted case-finding tool for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. PLoS ONE 8(2):e57262CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Danish PCD & chILD Centre, CF Centre Copenhagen, Paediatric Pulmonary Service, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent MedicineCopenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations