Advertisement

Lung

, Volume 197, Issue 1, pp 67–72 | Cite as

Significant Delay in the Detection of Desaturation between Finger Transmittance and Earlobe Reflectance Oximetry Probes during Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: Analysis of 104 Cases

  • Barak PertzovEmail author
  • Elitsur Brachfeld
  • Avraham Unterman
  • Evgeni Gershman
  • Nader Abdel-Rahman
  • Dror Rosengarten
  • Mordechai Reuven Kramer
INTERVENTIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY

Abstract

Purpose

There is clinical significance to a delay in response time for detecting desaturation by pulse oximetry. Our aim in this study was to compare the response time of the reflectance and transmittance saturation probes during fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) under monitored anesthesia care.

Methods

A prospective study included 104 patients scheduled for FOB. Patients were monitored with transmittance (finger) and reflectance (ear) oximetry probes. The response time was evaluated during desaturation and resaturation. We also acquired blood tests for arterial oxygen saturation to assess the agreement with the oximetry probes.

Results

Ninety patients had a desaturation episode during FOB and were included in the final analysis. Mean time difference between the reflectance ear probe (reference probe) and transmittance finger probe for the detection of desaturation (SpO2 = 90%) was + 36 s (CI 27.0–45.0, P < 0.001). The time difference between probes at end of desaturation episode (SpO2 = 95%) was + 31 s (CI 19.0–43.0; P < 0.001). A significant difference in response time was evident throughout the episode in all saturation values. The reflectance ear probe showed better agreement with arterial blood gases. The bias (and precision) for the earlobe and finger oximeters were of 0.24 (1.04) and 2.31 (3.37), respectively.

Conclusion

The data displayed by a centrally located reflectance probe are more accurate and allows for earlier identification, treatment, and resolution of desaturation events. In light of these data and the added value of the reflectance probe ability to measure transcutaneous PCO2, we recommend monitoring bronchoscopy by a reflectance oximetry probe.

Keywords

Bronchoscopy Oxygen saturation Transmittance Reflectance Delay 

Abbreviations

FOB

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy

ABG

Arterial blood gases

SpO2

Pulse oximeter saturation

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Tremper KK, Barker SJ (1989) Pulse oximetry. Anesthesiology 70(1):98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Severinghaus JW, Kelleher JF (1992) Recent developments in pulse oximetry. Anesthesiology 76(6):1018–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wahr JA, Tremper KK (1995) Noninvasive oxygen monitoring techniques. Crit Care Clin 11(1):199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pretto JJ, Roebuck T, Beckert L, Hamilton G (2014) Clinical use of pulse oximetry: official guidelines from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. Respirology 19(1):38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pedersen T, Nicholson A, Hovhannisyan K, Moller AM, Smith AF, Lewis SR (2014) Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002013.pub3 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Du Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, Chaudhuri N, Gupta V, Khalid S et al British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax 2013;68(Suppl 1):i1-i44Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Severinghaus JW, Naifeh KH, Koh SO (1989) Errors in 14 pulse oximeters during profound hypoxia. J Clin Monit 5(2):72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trivedi NS, Ghouri AF, Lai E, Shah NK, Barker SJ (1997) Pulse oximeter performance during desaturation and resaturation: a comparison of seven models. J Clin Anesth 9(3):184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi SJ, Ahn HJ, Yang MK, Kim CS, Sim WS, Kim JA et al (2010) Comparison of desaturation and resaturation response times between transmission and reflectance pulse oximeters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54(2):212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schallom L, Sona C, McSweeney M, Mazuski J (2007) Comparison of forehead and digit oximetry in surgical/trauma patients at risk for decreased peripheral perfusion. Heart Lung 36(3):188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fernandez M, Burns K, Calhoun B, George S, Martin B, Weaver C (2007) Evaluation of a new pulse oximeter sensor. Am J Crit Care 16(2):146–152Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nuhr M, Hoerauf K, Joldzo A, Frickey N, Barker R, Gorove L et al (2004) Forehead SpO2 monitoring compared to finger SpO2 recording in emergency transport. Anaesthesia 59(4):390–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacLeod DB, Cortinez LI, Keifer JC, Cameron D, Wright DR, White WD et al (2005) The desaturation response time of finger pulse oximeters during mild hypothermia. Anaesthesia 60(1):65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wax DB, Rubin P, Neustein S (2009) A comparison of transmittance and reflectance pulse oximetry during vascular surgery. Anesth Analg 109(6):1847–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bebout D, Mannheimer P (2002) Effects of cold-induced peripheral vasoconstriction on pulse amplitude at various pulse oximeter sensor sites. Anesthesiology.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200209002-00558 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bebout DE, Asbagh NA (2002) Detection of hypoxemia during peripheral vasoconstriction at the radial artery and various pulse oximeter sensor sites. Crit Care Med 30(12):328Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8(2):135–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bickler PE, Feiner JR, Lipnick MS, Batchelder P, MacLeod DB, Severinghaus JW (2017) Effects of acute, profound hypoxia on healthy humans: implications for safety of tests evaluating pulse oximetry or tissue oximetry performance. Anesth Analg 124(1):146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geraci G, Pisello F, Sciume C, Li Volsi F, Romeo M, Modica G (2007) Complication of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Literature review. Ann Ital Chir 78(3):183–192Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stahl DL, Richard KM, Papadimos TJ (2015) Complications of bronchoscopy: a concise synopsis. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 5(3):189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dreisin RB, Albert RK, Talley PA, Kryger MH, Scoggin CH, Zwillich CW (1978) Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the teaching hospital. Yield Complications. Chest 74(2):144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pereira W, Kovnat DM, Snider GL (1978) A prospective cooperative study of complications following flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 73(6):813–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suratt PM, Smiddy JF, Gruber B (1976) Deaths and complications associated with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 69(6):747–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fruchter O, Carmi U, Ingenito EP, Refaeli Y, Kramer MR (2011) Transcutaneous carbon dioxide in severe COPD patients during bronchoscopic lung volume reduction. Respir Med 105(4):602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Evans EN, Ganeshalingam K, Ebden P (1998) Changes in oxygen saturation and transcutaneous carbon dioxide and oxygen levels in patients undergoing fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Respir Med 92(5):739–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carmi U, Kramer MR, Zemtzov D, Rosengarten D, Fruchter O (2011) Propofol safety in bronchoscopy: prospective randomized trial using transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension monitoring. Respiration 82(6):515–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yazawa R, Gamo M, Kokawa A, Hirose Y (2008) Are transcutaneous blood gas measurement monitors (SenTec Digital Monitor system) useful for the respiratory management of chronic respiratory failure? Masui 57(4):453–456Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pulmonary DivisionRabin Medical CenterPetach TikvaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiaRabin Medical CenterPetach TikvaIsrael
  3. 3.Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  4. 4.Pulmonary InstituteRabin Medical CenterPetach TikvaIsrael

Personalised recommendations