Advertisement

Lung

, Volume 193, Issue 1, pp 47–51 | Cite as

Assessment of Spirometry and Impulse Oscillometry in Relation to Asthma Control

  • Arvind Manoharan
  • William J. Anderson
  • Joseph Lipworth
  • Brian J. LipworthEmail author
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Guidelines advocate the use of spirometry to assess pulmonary function in asthmatic patients. Commonly used measures include forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced expiratory ratio (FEV1/FVC), and forced mid-expiratory flow between 25 and 75 % of forced vital capacity (FEF25–75). Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is an effort-independent test performed during tidal breathing. IOS may be used to assess the total and central airway resistance at 5 Hz (R5) and 20 Hz (R20), respectively, and hence derive the peripheral airway resistance from the difference (R5–R20). We compared spirometry and IOS as tests of global airway function (i.e., FEV1, FEV1/FVC, R5) and putative measures of small airways function (i.e., FEF25–75, R5–R20) and their relationship to oral steroid and short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use as surrogates for long-term asthma control.

Methods

Spirometry and IOS measurements from physician-diagnosed asthmatics were linked to a health informatics database for oral steroid and SABA use 1 year prior to the index measurements.

Results

Four hundred forty-two patients had both spirometry and IOS, mean FEV1 = 86 % predicted, 94 % on ICS, median dose 800 µg/day. IOS and spirometry measures were equally predictive of impaired asthma control for both oral steroid and SABA use. For oral steroid use, the adjusted odds ratio, OR (95 % CI) is as follows: FEV1 < 80 %: 1.56(0.99–2.47), p = 0.056; FEV1/FVC < 0.70: 1.67(1.03–2.69), p = 0.037; FEF25–75 < 60 %: 1.84(1.18–2.86), p = 0.007; R5 > 150 %: 1.91(1.25–2.95), p = 0.003; and R5–R20 > 0.1 kPa L−1 s 1.73(1.12–2.66), p = 0.013. For SABA use, the adjusted OR (95 % CI) is as follows: FEV1 < 80 %: 2.22(1.43–3.44), p < 0.001; FEV1/FVC < 0.70: 2.26(1.44–3.57), p < 0.001; FEF25–75 < 60 %: 2.51(1.65–3.82), p < 0.001; R5 > 150 %: 1.76(1.18–2.63), p = 0.006; and R5–R20 > 0.1 kPa L−1 s: 2.94(1.94–4.46), p < 0.001.

Conclusion

Spirometry or IOS measurements were equally useful as potential markers of asthma control in persistent asthmatic patients.

Keywords

Small airways Spirometry Impulse oscillometry Asthma, corticosteroid Short-acting beta-agonist 

Notes

Conflict of interest

AM has received support from Teva to attend the 2013 European Respiratory Society Congress and Chiesi to attend the 2014 meeting. WJA has received support from Chiesi to attend the 2013 European Respiratory Society Congress. BJL is on the Speaker Bureau for Teva and Advisory Board for Chiesi and Teva. JL has no competing interests to declare. The Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research has received unrestricted educational grants from Chiesi and Teva and participated in a multicentre study sponsored by Teva.

Ethical standards

This manuscript complies with the current laws of the United Kingdom

References

  1. 1.
    Bateman ED, Hurd SS, Barnes PJ et al (2008) Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J 31:143–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lipworth B (2013) Targeting the small airways asthma phenotype: if we can reach it, should we treat it? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 110:233–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V et al (2005) Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 26:319–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    (2008) British guideline on the management of asthma. Thorax 63 Suppl 4: iv1–121Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shi Y, Aledia AS, Galant SP et al (2013) Peripheral airway impairment measured by oscillometry predicts loss of asthma control in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 131:718–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rao DR, Gaffin JM, Baxi SN et al (2012) The utility of forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75 % of vital capacity in predicting childhood asthma morbidity and severity. J Asthma 49:586–592PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lipworth B, Manoharan A, Anderson W (2014) Unlocking the quiet zone: the small airway asthma phenotype. Lancet Respir Med 2:497–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gonem S, Natarajan S, Desai D et al (2014) Clinical significance of small airway obstruction markers in patients with asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 44:499–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Juniper EF, Price DB, Stampone PA et al (2002) Clinically important improvements in asthma-specific quality of life, but no difference in conventional clinical indexes in patients changed from conventional beclomethasone dipropionate to approximately half the dose of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate. Chest 121:1824–1832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Price D, Martin RJ, Barnes N et al (2010) Prescribing practices and asthma control with hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone and fluticasone: a real-world observational study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 126(511–8):e1–e10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barnes N, Price D, Colice G et al (2011) Asthma control with extrafine-particle hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone vs. large-particle chlorofluorocarbon-beclometasone: a real-world observational study. Clin Exp Allergy 41:1521–1532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arvind Manoharan
    • 1
  • William J. Anderson
    • 1
  • Joseph Lipworth
    • 1
  • Brian J. Lipworth
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Medicine, Medical Research InstituteUniversity of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations