Archive for History of Exact Sciences

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 143–143

# Correction to: The modernity of Dedekind’s anticipations contained in What are numbers and what are they good for?

Correction

## 1 Correction to: Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-018-0202-6

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake: The equation on page 34 was incorrect. The corrected equation is given below.
\begin{aligned} \varSigma ^{\mathrm {pr}}_{w,n} = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \{\kappa _{0,0}\}, &{} \text {if }w =\lambda \text { and }n=0; \\ \{\mathrm {sc}\}\cup \{\mathrm {pr}_{1,0}\}, &{} \text {if }w=\lambda \text { and } n=1; \\ \{\,\mathrm {pr}_{n,i}\mid i\in n\,\}, &{} \text {if } w =\lambda \text { and }n\ge 2; \\ \left\{ \varOmega _{\mathrm {C}}^{m,n}\right\} , &{} \text {if } w=(m)\curlywedge (n\mid i\in m) \text { and }m\ge 1; \\ \left\{ \varOmega _{\mathrm {R}}^{m}\right\} , &{} \text {if }w=(m)\curlywedge (m+2)\text { and } n=m+1; \\ \varnothing , &{} \text {otherwise.} \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}
The original article has been corrected.