Plimpton 322: a review and a different perspective

  • John P. Britton
  • Christine Proust
  • Steve Shnider
Article

References

  1. Aaboe A. (1964) Episodes from the early history of mathematics. New Mathematical Library, Vol. 13. Mathematical Association of America, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Anagnostakis C., Goldstein B.R. (1974) On an error in the Babylonian table of Pythagorean triples. Centaurus 18: 64–66MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attinger P. (2008) Racines carrées et racines cubiques. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 98: 12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baqir T. (1962) Tell Dhiba’i: New mathematical texts. Sumer 18: 11–14Google Scholar
  5. Bruins E.M. (1949) On Plimpton 322. Pythagorean numbers in Babylonian mathematics.. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen: Proceedings 52: 629–632MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruins E.M. (1955) Pythagorean triads in Babylonian mathematics: The errors in Plimpton 322. Sumer 11: 117–121MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruins E.M. (1957) Pythagorean triads in Babylonian mathematics. The Mathematical Gazette 41: 25–28MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruins E.M. (1967) Reciprocals and Pythagorean triads. Physis 9: 373–392MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Buck R.C. (1980) Sherlock Holmes in Babylon. American Mathematical Monthly 87: 335–45MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Solla Price D.J. (1964) The Babylonian Pythagorean triangle tablet. Centaurus 10: 219–31Google Scholar
  11. Friberg J. (1981) Methods and traditions of Babylonian mathematics: Plimpton 322. Pythagorean triples and the Babylonian triangle parameter equations. Historia Mathematica 8: 277–318MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friberg, J. 1990. Mathematik (in English). In RlA=Reallexikon der Assyriologie und vorderasiatischen Archäologie, ed. D.O. Edzard, 531–585. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Friberg, J. 2007. A remarkable collection of Babylonian mathematical texts, sources and studies in the history of mathematics and physical sciences. Berlin: Springer (especially, Appendix 8 Plimpton 322, a Table of Parameters for igi-igi.bi Problems).Google Scholar
  14. Gillings R.J. (1953) Unexplained errors in Babylonian Cuneiform tablet, Plimpton 322. Australian Journal of Science 16(l): 54–56MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Glassner J.-J. (2009) Ecrire des livres à l’époque paléo-babylonienne: le traité d’extispicine. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 99: 1–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Høyrup Jens. (2002) Lengths, widths, surfaces, sources and studies in the history of mathematics and physical sciences. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Huber P.J. (1957) Bemerkungen über mathematische Keilschrifttexte. L’Enseignement Mathématique 3: 19–57MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Huber, P.J. 1982. Astronomical dating of Babylon I and Ur III, Monographic Journals of the Near East, Occasional Papers. 1/4, June 1982, (with cooperation of A. Sachs, M. Stol, R.M. Whiting, E., Leichty, C.J.P. Walker, G. van Driel).Google Scholar
  19. Huber P.J. (2000). Astronomy and ancient chronology. Akkadica, 119–120; 159–176Google Scholar
  20. Manning S.W., Kromer B., Kuniholm P.I., Newton M.W. (2001) Anatolian tree rings and a new chronology for the east mediterannean bronze-iron ages. Science 294: 2532–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muroi K. (2003) Mathematical term Takiltum and completing the square in Babylonian mathematics.. Historia Scientiarum 12(3): 254–263MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Neugebauer, O. 1935–1937. Mathematische Keilschrift-Texte, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik, Vol. A3 (3 vols.). Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Neugebauer, O. 1951. The exact sciences in antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2nd ed. in 1957, Copenhagen: Munksgaard, Brown University Press. Reprinted in 1969, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  24. Neugebauer, O. and Sachs, A.J. 1945. Mathematical Cuneiform texts, American Oriental Series, Vol. 29. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
  25. Proust, C. 2011. Interpretation of reverse algorithms in several Mesopotamian texts. In History of mathematical proof in ancient traditions: the other evidence, ed. K. Chemla (trans. M. Ross). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Robson E. (2001) Neither Sherlock Holmes nor Babylon: A reassessment of Plimpton 322. Historia Mathematica 28: 167–206MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robson E. (2002a) Words and picture: New light on Plimpton 322. American Mathematical Monthly 109: 105–120MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robson, E. 2002b. Guaranteed genuine originals: The Plimpton collection and the early history of mathematical assyriology. In Mining the archives, ed. C. Wunsch. Dresden: ISLET Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Sachs A.J. (1947) Babylonian mathematical texts I: Reciprocals of regular sexagesimal numbers. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 1: 219–240MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt O. (1980) On Plimpton 322. Pythagorean numbers in Babylonian mathematics. Centaurus 24: 4–13MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thureau-Dangin, F. 1938. Textes mathématiques babyloniens. Publications de la société orientale Ex Oriente Lux, Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  32. Vaiman, A.A. 1961. Sumero-babylonian Mathematics in the third to first millennia b.o.e. (Shumero-vavivonskaya matematika III-I tysyacheletiya do n.e.). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Vostocnoj Literatury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Britton
    • 1
  • Christine Proust
    • 2
  • Steve Shnider
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for the Study of the Ancient WorldNYUWilsonUSA
  2. 2.Centre national de recherche scientifique (CNRS)ParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsBar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations