Abstract
In the Planetary Hypotheses, Ptolemy summarizes the planetary models that he discusses in great detail in the Almagest, but he changes the mean motions to account for more prolonged comparison of observations. He gives the mean motions in two different forms: first, in terms of ‘simple, unmixed’ periods and next, in terms of ‘particular, complex’ periods, which are approximations to linear combinations of the simple periods. As a consequence, all of the epoch values for the Moon and the planets are different at era Philip. This is in part a consequence of the changes in the mean motions and in part due to changes in Ptolemy’s time in the anomaly, but not the longitude or latitude, of the Moon, the mean longitude of Saturn and Jupiter, but not Mars, and the anomaly of Venus and Mercury, the former a large change, the latter a small one. The pattern of parameter changes we see suggests that the analyses that yielded the Planetary Hypotheses parameters were not the elegant trio analyses of the Almagest but some sort of serial determinations of the parameters based on sequences of independent observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duke D.W. (2005) Ptolemy’s treatment of the outer planets. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 59: 169–187
Duke D.W. (2008) Mean motions and longitudes in Indian astronomy. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 62: 489–509
Evans J. (1998). The theory and practice of ancient astronomy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 362–368
Fowler D.H. (1987) The Mathematics of Plato’s academy. Oxford University Press, New York
Goldstein B.R. (2002) On the Babylonian discovery of the periods of lunar motion. Journal for the History of Astronomy 33: 1–13
Hamilton, N.T., N.M. Swerdlow and G.J. Toomer. 1987. The Canobic inscription: Ptolemy’s earliest work. In From ancient Omens to statistical mechanics, eds. J.L. Berggren and B.R. Goldstein, 55–73. Copenhagen.
Heiberg, J.L. 1907. Claudii Ptolemaei opera quae exstant omnia. Volumen II. Opera astronomica minora, 69–145. Leipzig. There is an English translation of the Greek part of Book 1 by A. Jones (unpublished, 2004) and it is the source of all English excerpts that appear in this paper.
Jones A., Duke D. (2005) Ptolemy’s planetary mean motions revisited. Centaurus 47: 226–235
Neugebauer O. (1975) A history of ancient mathematical astronomy. Springer–Verlag, New York, pp 781–833
Stahlman, W.D. 1960. The Astronomical tables of Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1291. Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University.
Toomer G.J. (1984) Ptolemy’s Almagest. Duckworth, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Jones.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duke, D. Mean Motions in Ptolemy’s Planetary Hypotheses . Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 63, 635–654 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-009-0049-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-009-0049-y