Advertisement

Archive for History of Exact Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 213–254 | Cite as

Aristarchus's On the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and the Moon: Greek and Arabic Texts

  • J. L. Berggren
  • Nathan Sidoli
Article

Keywords

Solar Eclipse Lunar Orbit Arabic Text Simple Part Greek Text 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Acerbi F. (2003), Drowning by Multiples: Remarks on the Fifth Book of Euclid's Elements, with Special Emphasis on Prop. 8, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 57, 175–242.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anagnostakis C. (1984), The Arabic Version of Ptolemy's Planisphaerium, Ph.D Thesis, Yale University, New Haven.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowen A. C. and B. R. Goldstein (1994), Aristarchus, Thales, and Heraclitus on Solar Eclipses: An Astronomical Commentary on P. Oxy. 53.3710 Cols. 2.33–3.19, Physis, 31, 689–729.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berggren J. L. and R. S. D. Thomas (1996), Euclid's Phænomena: A Translation and Study of a Hellenistic Treatise in Spherical Astronomy, New York. (Reprited by the American Mathematical Society, 2006.)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cherniss H. and W. C. Helmbold, eds. and trans. (1968), Plutarch's Moralia: XII, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chavoshī J. A., intro. (2005), Nasir al-Din at-Tusi: Open image in new window facsimile of Tabriz National Library MS 3484, Tehrān.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christianidis J., Dialetis D. and K. Gavroglu (2002), Having a Knack for the Non-Intuitive: Aristarchus's Heliocentrism Through Archimedes's Geocentrism, History of Science, 40, 147–168.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Commandino F. (1572), Aristarchi De magnitudinibus, et distantiis solis, et lunae, liber cum Pappi Alexandrini explicationibus quibusdam. A Federico Commandino in Latinum conuersus, ac commentarijs illustratus, Pesaro.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dijksterhuis E. J. (1987), Archimedes, Princeton.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erhard R. v. and E. v. Erhardt-Siebold (1942), Archimedes' Sand Reckoner: Aristarchos and Copernicus, Isis, 33, 578–602.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erhard R. v. and E. v. Erhardt (1943), Notes and Correspondence, Isis, 34, 212–215.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fortia d'Urban A. (1810), Histoire d'Aristarque de Samos, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fowler D. H. (1987), The Mathematics of Plato's Academy, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Friedlein G. (1873), Procli Diadochi in primum Euclidis elementorum librum commentarii, Liepzig.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heath T. L. (1926), The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heath T. L. (1913), Aristarchus of Samos, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heath T. L. (1921), A History of Greek Mathematics, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heiberg J. L., ed. et int. (1895), Euclidis optica, opticorum recensio Theonis, catoptrica, cum scoliis antiquis, Leipzig, Euclidis opera omnia, vol. 6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heiberg J. L., ed. et int. (1973), Archimedis opera omnia cum commentariis Eutocii, 3 vols., Leipzig, cor. et ad. E. Stamatis.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hultsch F., ed. et int. (1876–1878), Pappi Alexandrini collectionis quae supersunt, 3 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones A. (1994), Peripatetic and Euclidean Theories of the Visual Ray, Physis, 31 Nuova Serie, 47–76.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kheirandish E. (1999), The Arabic Version of Euclid's Optics, New York.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knorr W. (1985), Ancient Versions of Two Trigonometric Lemmas, Classical Quarterly, 35, 362–391.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knorr W. (1991), On the Principle of Linear Perspective in Euclid's Optics, Centaurus, 34, 193–210.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knorr W. (1994), Pseudo Euclidean Reflection in Ancient Optics: A Re-Examination of Textural Issues Pertaining to the Euclidean Optica and Catoptrica, Physis, 31 Nuova Serie, 1–45.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kraus H. P. (1974), Monumenta codicum manuscriptoirum. An Exhibition Catalogue of Manuscripts of the 6th to the 17th Centuries from the Libraries of the Monasteries of St. Catherine, Mount Sinai, Monte Cassino, Lorsch, Nanantola, New York.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lorch R. (2001), Thābit ibn Qurra On the Sector Figure and Related Texts, Islamic Mathematics and Astronomy 108, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mogenet J. (1950), Autolycus de Pitane, histoire du texte suivie de l'edition critique des traités de la Sphère in mouvement et couchers, Université catholique de Louvain, Recueil de Travaux d'histoire et de philologie, 3e série, 37.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mueller I. (1981), Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid's Elements, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Netz R. (1999a), The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Netz R. (1999b), Proclus' Division of the Mathematical Proposition into Parts: How and Why Was It Formulated? Classical Quaterly, 49, 282–303.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neugebauer O. (1942), Archimedes and Aristarchus, Isis, 34, 4–6.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Neugebauer O. (1975), A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy, New York.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Newton R. R. (1977) The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Noack B. (1992) Aristarch von Samos: Untersuchungen zur Überlieferungsgeschichte der Schrif Open image in new window Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Panchenko D. (2001), Aristarchus of Samos on the apparent sizes of the sun and moon, Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption, 11, 23–29.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rawlins D. (1991), Ptolemy's Planetary Models as Funny Science, Journal of Hysterical Astronomy, 1.1 sec. 7.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ragep F. J. (1993), Open image in new window Memoir on Astronomy, 2 vols., New York.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rashed R. (1996), Les mathématiques infinitésimales du IXe au XIe siècle, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sabra, A. I. (1987), The Appropriation and Subsequent Naturalization of Greek Science in Medieval Islam: A Preliminary Statement, History of Science, 25, 223–243.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schoy C. (1926), Graeco-Arabische Studien, Isis, 8, 21–41.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sezgin F. (1978), Geschichte des arabischen Schrifttums, Band VI: Astronomie, Leiden.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taisbak C. M., trans. and com. (2003), Euclid's Data: The Importance of Being Given, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tannery P. (1912), Mémoires Scientifiques I: Sciences exacts dans l'antiquité, Paris.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Toomer G. J., trans. (1984), Ptolemy's Almagest, London.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
  47. 47.
    al-Open image in new window N. al-D. (1940), Kitāb Open image in new window fī jirmay al-nayirayn wa-bu`dayhimā, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Uri J. (1787), Bibliothecæ Bodleianæ codicum manuscriptorum orientaium, Oxford.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vitrac B. (1990–2001), Euclide d'Alexandrie: Les Éléments, 4 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wall B. E. (1975), The Historiography of Aristarchos of Samos, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 6, 201–228.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wallis J. (1688), Aristarchi Samii de magnitudinibus & distantiis solis & lunæ, liber. Nunc primum Græce editus cum Federici Commandini versione Latina, notisque illius & editoris, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations