Advertisement

Archive for History of Exact Sciences

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 45–105 | Cite as

Einstein’s Investigations of Galilean Covariant Electrodynamics Prior to 1905

  • John D.  Norton
Article

Abstract.

Einstein learned from the magnet and conductor thought experiment how to use field transformation laws to extend the covariance of Maxwell’s electrodynamics. If he persisted in his use of this device, he would have found that the theory cleaves into two Galilean covariant parts, each with different field transformation laws. The tension between the two parts reflects a failure not mentioned by Einstein: that the relativity of motion manifested by observables in the magnet and conductor thought experiment does not extend to all observables in electrodynamics. An examination of Ritz’s work shows that Einstein’s early view could not have coincided with Ritz’s on an emission theory of light, but only with that of a conveniently reconstructed Ritz. One Ritz-like emission theory, attributed by Pauli to Ritz, proves to be a natural extension of the Galilean covariant part of Maxwell’s theory that happens also to accommodate the magnet and conductor thought experiment. Einstein’s famous chasing a light beam thought experiment fails as an objection to an ether-based, electrodynamical theory of light. However it would allow Einstein to formulate his general objections to all emission theories of light in a very sharp form. Einstein found two well known experimental results of 18th and 19th century optics compelling (Fizeau’s experiment, stellar aberration), while the accomplished Michelson-Morley experiment played no memorable role. I suggest they owe their importance to their providing a direct experimental grounding for Lorentz‘ local time, the precursor of Einstein’s relativity of simultaneity, and doing it essentially independently of electrodynamical theory. I attribute Einstein’s success to his determination to implement a principle of relativity in electrodynamics, but I urge that we not invest this stubbornness with any mystical prescience.

Keywords

Covariance 19th Century Local Time Light Beam Natural Extension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beck, Anna (trans.) (1983) [English Translation of] The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 1: The Early Years: 1879–1902. P. Havas, consultant. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck, Anna (trans.) (1996) [English Translation of] The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 4: The Swiss Years: 1912–1914. D. Howard, consultant. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, Anna (trans.) (1995) [English Translation of] The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 5: The Swiss Years: Correspondence, 1902–1914. D. Howard, consultant. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, Richard (1964) Electromagnetic Fields and Interactions. 2 Vols. New York: Blaidsdell; republished as one volume, New York: Dover, 1982.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Born, Max (1962) Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darrigol, Olivier (1996) ‘‘The Electrodynamic Origins of Relativity Theory,’’ Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 26, pp. 241–312.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drude, Paul (1900) Lehrbuch der Optik. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Earman, John, Glymour, Clark and Rynasiewicz, Robert (1983) ‘‘On Writing the History of Special Relativity,’’ PSA 1982, Volume 2. Peter D. Asquith and Thomas Nickles, eds., East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 403–416.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ehrenfest, Paul (1912) ‘‘Zur Frage der Entbehrlichkeit des Lichtäthers,’’ Physikalische Zeitschrift, 13, pp. 317–19.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Einstein, Albert (1905) ‘‘Zur Electrodynamik bewegter Körper,’’ Annalen der Physik, 17, pp. 891–921; Papers, Vol. 2, Doc. 23.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Einstein, Albert (1907) ‘‘Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die ausdemselben gezogenen Folgerungen,’’ Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik, 4, pp. 411–62; Papers, Vol. 2, Doc. 47.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Einstein, Albert (1909) ‘‘Über die Entwicklung unserer Anschauungen über das Wesen and die Konstution der Strahlung,’’ Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft, Verhandlungen, 7(1909), pp. 482–500; also in Physikalische Zeitschrfit, 10, pp. 817–825; Papers, Vol. 2, Doc. 60.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Einstein, Albert (1909a) ‘‘Zum gegenwärtigen Stand des Strahlungsproblems,’’ Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10, pp. 185–93; Papers, Vol. 2, Doc. 56.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Einstein, Albert (1910) ‘‘Le Principe de Relativité et ses Conséquences dans la Physique Moderne,’‘Trans. E. Guillaume. Archives des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles, 29, pp. 5–28, 125–44; Doc. 2 in Papers, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Einstein, Albert (1911) ‘‘Die Relativitätstheorie,’’ Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Zürich, Vierteljahrsschrift, 56, pp. 1–14; Papers, Vol. 3, Doc. 17.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Einstein, Albert (1912–14) Manuscript on the Special Theory of Relativity. Papers, Vol. 4, Doc. 1.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Einstein, Albert (1914–15) Lecture notes for course on relativity at the University of Berlin, Winter Semester, 1914–1915. Papers, Vol. 6, Doc. 7.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Einstein, Albert (1915) ‘‘Die Relativitätstheorie,’’ in P. Hinnenburg, ed., Die Kultur der Gegenwart. Ihre Entwicklung und ihre Ziele. As reproduced in Papers, Vol. 4, Doc. 21.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Einstein, Albert (1917) Über die spezielle and die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie (Gemeinverständlich). Braunschweig: Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn; Papers, Vol. 6, Doc. 42. 15th expanded edition, trans. R. W. Lawson, Relativity: the Special and the General Theory. London’’ Methuen, 1954.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Einstein, Albert (1918) ‘‘Bemerkung zu E. Gehrckes Notiz ‘Über den Äther’,’’ Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen 20, p.261.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Einstein, Albert (1918–1919) Lecture notes for course on special relativity at the University of Berlin and the University of Zurich, Winter Semester, 1918–1919. Papers, Vol. 7, Doc. 12.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Einstein, Albert (1920) ‘‘Fundamental Ideas and Methods of the theory of Relativity, Presented in Their Development,’’ Papers, Vol. 7, Doc. 31.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Einstein, Albert (1920a) Äther und Relativität. Berlin: Julius Springer. Papers, Vol. 7, Doc. 38.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Einstein, Albert (1922) Vier Vorlesungen über Relativitätstheorie. Braunschweig: Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn (Papers, Vol. 7, Doc. 71); translated as The Meaning of Relativity. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1922.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Einstein, Albert (1949) Autobiographical Notes. P. A. Schilpp, trans. and ed., La Salle and Chicago: Open court, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Einstein, Albert (1954) ‘‘Relativity and the Problem of Space’’ Appendix V added to 5th edition of Einstein (1917).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Einstein, Albert (1956) ‘‘Autobiographische Skizze,’’ pp. 9–17 in Seelig, Carl (ed.) Helle Zeit – Dunkle Zeit. Zurich: Europa Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fölsing, Albrecht (1997) Albert Einstein: A Biography. Trans E. Osers. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Föppl, August (1894) Einführung in die Maxwell‘sche Theorie der Elektricität. Leipzig: B. G. Tuebner.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Forman, Paul (1975) ‘‘Ritz, Walter,’‘pp. 475–81 in C. C. Gillispie (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. XI, New York: Scribners, 1975.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoffmann, Banesh (1982) ‘‘Some Einstein Anomalies,’‘pp. 91–105 in G. Holton and Y. Elkana (eds.) Albert Einstein’’ Historical and Cultural Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holton, Gerald (1973) ‘‘Influences of Einstein’s Early Work,’’ Ch.7 in Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hovgaard, William (1931) ‘‘Ritz’s Electrodynamic Theory,’’ Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 11(1931–32), pp.218–254.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Howard, Don and Stachel, John(eds.) (2000) Einstein: the Formative Years, 1879–1909: Einstein Studies, Volume 8. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jammer, Max and Stachel, John (1980) ‘‘If Maxwell had Worked between Ampère and Faraday: An Historical Fable with a Pedagogical Moral,’’ American Journal of Physics, 48, pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Janssen, Michel (1995) A Comparison Between Lorentz’s Ether Theory and Special Relativity in the Light of the Experiments of Trouton and Noble. PhD Dissertation. Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Janssen, Michel et al. (2002) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 7: The Berlin Years: Writings, 1918–1921. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (‘‘ Papers, Vol. 7.’’)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Janssen, Michel and Stachel, John (forthcoming) ‘‘The Optics and Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,’’ in J. Stachel, Going Critical.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Klein, Martin J. et al. (1993) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 3: The Swiss Years: Writings, 1909–1911. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (‘‘ Papers, Vol. 3.’’)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Klein, Martin J. et al. (1995) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 4: The Swiss Years: Writings, 1912–1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (‘‘ Papers, Vol. 4.’’)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kox, A. J. et al. (1996) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 6: The Berlin Years: Writings, 1914–1917. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (‘‘ Papers, Vol. 6.’’)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lorentz, Hendrik A. (1895) Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lorentz, Hendrik A. (1904) ‘‘Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving with any Velocity less than that of Light,’’ Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences, Amsterdam, 6; reprintedpp. 11–34 H. A. Lorentz et al., The Principle of Relativity. Trans W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffrey. Methuen, 1923; Dover, 1952.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Miller, Arthur (1981) Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Norton, John D. (1984) ‘‘How Einstein Found His Field Equations: 1912–1915,’’ Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 14 (1984), pp. 253–315. Reprinted in D. Howard and J. Stachel (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity: Einstein Studies Vol. I, Boston: Birkhauser, pp101–159.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Norton, John D. (1993)’‘General Covariance and the Foundations of General Relativity: Eight Decades of Dispute,’’ Reports on Progress in Physics, 56, pp.791–858.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Norton, John D. (manuscript), ‘‘Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity and the Problems in the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies that Led him to it,’’ prepared for Cambridge Companion to Einstein, M. Janssen and C. Lehner, eds., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    O’Rahilly, Alfred (1938) Electromagnetics. Longmans, Green & Co.; republished as Electromagnetic Theory: A Critical Examination of Fundamentals. 2 Vols., New York: Dover, 1965.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pauli, Wolfgang (1921) ‘‘Relativitätstheorie,’’ in Encyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften, mit Einschluss an ihrer Anwendung. Vol.5, Physik, Part 2. Arnold Sommerfeld, ed., Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1904–1922, pp.539–775. [Issued November 15, 1921] English translation, Theory of Relativity. With supplementary notes by the author. G. Field, trans. London: Pergamon, 1958; reprint New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ritz, Walter (1908) ‘‘Recherches Critique sur l’Électrodynamique Gènénerale,’’ Annales des Chimie et de Physique,’’ 13, pp. 145–275; reprinted in Ritz (1911), pp. 317–426.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ritz, Walter (1908a) ‘‘Recherches Critiques sur les Théories Électrodynamiques de Cl. Maxwell and de H. –A. Lorentz,’’ Archives des Sciences physique et naturelles, 26, pp. 209–36; reprinted Ritz (1911), pp. 427–92.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ritz, Walter (1909) ‘‘Über die Grundlagen der Elektrodynamik und die Theorie der Schwarzen Strahlung,’’ Physikalische Zeitschrift, 9, pp. 903–907; reprinted as Ritz (1911), pp. 493–502.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ritz, Walter (1909a) ‘‘Zum gegenwärtigen Stand des Strahlungsproblems: Erwiderung auf den Aufsatz des Herrn A. Einstein,’’ Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10, pp. 224–25.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ritz, Walter (1911) Gesammelte Werke. Oeuvres. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ritz, Walter and Einstein, Albert (1909), ‘‘Zum gegenwärtigen Stand des Strahlungsproblems,’’ Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10, pp. 323–34; reprinted as Papers, Vol. 2, Doc. 57 and Ritz (1911), pp. 507–508.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rynasiewicz, Robert (1988) ‘‘Lorentz’s Local Time and the Theorem of Corresponding States,’’ PSA 1988, Vol. 1, A. Fine and J. Leplin, eds., East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 67–74.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rynasiewicz, Robert (2000) ‘‘The Construction of the Special Theory: Some Queries and Considerations,’’ in Howard and Stachel (2000), pp. 159–201.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shankland, R. S. (1963/73) ‘‘Conversations with Einstein,’’ American Journal of Physics, 31(1963), pp. 47–57; 41(1973), pp. 895–901.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sitter, W. de (1913) ‘‘Ein astronomischer Beweis für die Konstanz der Lichtgeschwindigkeit,’’ Physikalische Zeitschrift, 14, p. 429.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stachel, John (1982) ‘‘Einstein and Michelson: the Context of Discovery and Context of Justification,’’ Astronomische Nachrichten, 303(1982), pp. 47–53; reprinted Stachel (2002), pp. 177–90.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stachel, John (1984) ‘‘The Generally Covariant Form of Maxwell’s Equations,’’ pp. 23–37 in M. Berger, ed., J. C. Maxwell: The Sesquicentennial Symposium. North-Holland.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stachel, John (1987) ‘‘Einstein and Ether Drift Experiments,’’ Physics Today, 40(1987), pp. 45–47; reprinted Stachel (2002), pp. 171–76.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Stachel, John (1989) ‘‘Quale canzone cantarono le sirene: come scopro Einstein la teoria speciale della relatività?’’ L’Opera di Einstein. Umberto Curi (ed.). Ferrara, Gabriele Corbino & Co. (1989), pp. 21–37; translated and reprinted as ‘‘‘What Song the Sirens Sang:’ How Did Einstein discover Special Relativity?’’ in Stachel (2002), pp. 157–69.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stachel, John (2002) Einstein from ‘B’ to ‘Z.’ : Einstein Studies, Volume 9. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stachel, John et al. (eds.) (1987) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 1: The Early Years: 1879–1902. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (‘‘ Papers, Vol. 1’’)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Stachel, John et al. (eds.) (1989) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 2: The Swiss Years: Writing, 1900–1902. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (‘‘ Papers, Vol. 2.’’)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Stachel, John et al. (1989a) ‘‘Einstein on the Theory of Relativity,’’ Headnote in Papers, Vol. 2 pp. 253–74.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tolman, Richard C. (1912) ‘‘Some Emission Theories of Light,’’ Physical Review, XXXV, pp. 136–43.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wertheimer, Max (1959) Productive Thinking. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations