The cognitive, affective motivational and clinical longitudinal determinants of apathy in schizophrenia
Apathy is a frequent and debilitating condition with few treatment options available in schizophrenia patients. Despite evidence of its multidimensional structure, most of past studies have explored apathy through a categorical approach. The main objective of this study was to identify the cognitive, emotional, motivational, and clinical factors at baseline that best predicted the three subtypes of apathy dimensions at follow-up. In a longitudinal study, 137 participants diagnosed with schizophrenia underwent different assessments including clinical, motivational, affective and cognitive measurements, at 1-month (referred to as baseline) and 12-month follow-ups. Data were analyzed using partial least squares variance-based structural equation modeling. Three latent variables representing the three previously described domains of apathy reaching consensus in the literature were extracted from the Lille Apathy Rating Scale. Results showed that in addition to baseline apathy, positive symptoms, anticipatory pleasure and sensibility to punishment at baseline predicted cognitive apathy at follow-up. Likewise, both baseline apathy and sensibility to punishment predicted emotional apathy at follow-up. Finally, baseline anhedonia and episodic memory were the main variables the predicted behavioral apathy at follow-up. This is the first study to show specific associations between apathy subtypes and clinical and cognitive motivational dysfunction in individual with schizophrenia, indicating possible distinct underlying mechanisms to these demotivational symptoms. Treatment for apathy should address both types of processes. Importantly, our results demonstrate the interest of multidimensional approaches in the understanding of apathy in schizophrenia.
KeywordsApathy Longitudinal study Negative symptoms Partial least squares-path modeling
The study was financed by a University Hospital Clinical Research Grant, Montpellier (#UF8641), 2010. The University Hospital had no further role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of this study.
- 3.Robert P, Onyike CU, Leentjens AF, Dujardin K, Aalten P, Starkstein S, Verhey FR, Yessavage J, Clement JP, Drapier D, Bayle F, Benoit M, Boyer P, Lorca PM, Thibaut F, Gauthier S, Grossberg G, Vellas B, Byrne J (2009) Proposed diagnostic criteria for apathy in Alzheimer’s disease and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Eur Psychiatry 24:98–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Strauss GP, Horan WP, Kirkpatrick B, Fischer BA, Keller WR, Miski P et al (2013) Deconstructing negative symptoms of schizophrenia: avolition-apathy and diminished expression clusters predict clinical presentation and functional outcome. J Psychiatr Res 47:783–790PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Evensen J, Røssberg JI, Barder H, Haahr U, Hegelstad Wt, Joa I, Johannessen JO, Larsen TK, Melle I, Opjordsmoen S, Rund BR, Simonsen E, Sundet K, Vaglum P, Friis S, McGlashan T (2012) Apathy in first episode psychosis patients: a ten year longitudinal follow-up study. Schizophr Res 136:19–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Strauss GP, Horan WP, Kirkpatrick B, Fischer BA, Keller WR, Miski P, Buchanan RW, Green MF, Caprenter WTJr (2013) Deconstructing negatives symptoms of schizophrenia: avolition-apathy and diminished expression clusters predict clinical presentation and functional outcome. J Psychiatr Res 47:783–790PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Aleman A, Lincoln TM, Bruggeman R, Melle I, Arends J, Arango C, Knegtering H (2017) Treatment of negative symptoms: where do we stand, and where do we go? Schizophr Res 9:205–212 researchGoogle Scholar
- 29.Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 30.First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams J (1997) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis disorders (SCID), clinician version: user’s guide. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 41.Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA (2000) California verbal learning test—second edition. Adult version. Manual. Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 42.Wechsler D (1997) Wechsler adult intelligence scale-3rd edition (WAIS-3). Harcourt Assessment, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 43.Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ (1996) The behavioural assessment for the dysexecutive syndrome manual. Bury St. Thames Valley Test Company, EdmundsGoogle Scholar
- 44.Logan GD (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user’s guide to the stop-signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 189–239Google Scholar
- 45.Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005). SmartPLS 2.0. Hamburg. http://www.smartpls.de
- 50.Gray JA, McNaughton N (2000) The neuropsychology of anxiety. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 72.Freeman D, Pugh K, Dunn G, Evans N, Sheaves B, Waite F, Cernis E, Lister R, Fowler D (2014) An early Phase II randomised controlled trial testing the effect on persecutory delusions of using CBT to reduce negative cognitions about the self: the potential benefits of enhancing self confidence. Schizophr Res 160:186–192PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar