Comparing two basic subtypes in OCD across three large community samples: a pure compulsive versus a mixed obsessive–compulsive subtype
Due to its heterogeneous phenomenology, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) has been subtyped. However, these subtypes are not mutually exclusive. This study presents an alternative subtyping approach by deriving non-overlapping OCD subtypes. A pure compulsive and a mixed obsessive–compulsive subtype (including subjects manifesting obsessions with/without compulsions) were analyzed with respect to a broad pattern of psychosocial risk factors and comorbid syndromes/diagnoses in three representative Swiss community samples: the Zurich Study (n = 591), the ZInEP sample (n = 1500), and the PsyCoLaus sample (n = 3720). A selection of comorbidities was examined in a pooled database. Odds ratios were derived from logistic regressions and, in the analysis of pooled data, multilevel models. The pure compulsive subtype showed a lower age of onset and was characterized by few associations with psychosocial risk factors. The higher social popularity of the pure compulsive subjects and their families was remarkable. Comorbidities within the pure compulsive subtype were mainly restricted to phobias. In contrast, the mixed obsessive–compulsive subtype had a higher prevalence and was associated with various childhood adversities, more familial burden, and numerous comorbid disorders, including disorders characterized by high impulsivity. The current comparison study across three representative community surveys presented two basic, distinct OCD subtypes associated with differing psychosocial impairment. Such highly specific subtypes offer the opportunity to learn about pathophysiological mechanisms specifically involved in OCD.
KeywordsObsessive–compulsive disorder Distinct subtypes Comorbidity Epidemiology
We thank all the participants who participated in the epidemiological surveys as well as all the interviewers who collected the data. The Zurich Study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. 32-50881.97). ZInEP was supported by a private donation. The donor had no further role in experimental design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of this report, or the decision to submit this paper for publication. The PsyCoLaus study was and is supported by research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, the Faculty of Biology and Medicine of Lausanne, and the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grants 3200B0–105993, 3200B0-118308, 33CSCO-122661, 33CS30-139468, and 33CS30-148401).
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 2.Ajdacic-Gross V, Muller M, Rodgers S, Warnke I, Hengartner MP, Landolt K, Hagenmuller F, Meier M, Tse LT, Aleksandrowicz A, Passardi M, Knopfli D, Schonfelder H, Eisele J, Rusch N, Haker H, Kawohl W, Rossler W (2014) The ZInEP Epidemiology Survey: background, design and methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 23:451–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ajdacic-Gross V, Rodgers S, Müller M, Hengartner MP, Aleksandrowicz A, Kawohl W, Heekeren K, Rössler W, Angst J, Castelao E, Vandeleur C, Preisig M (2014) Pure subtypes make a big difference. Distinctive versus fuzzy subtyping in specific phobias(submitted)Google Scholar
- 12.Bernstein DP, Fink L (1998) Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: a retrospective self-report. Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 19.Delucchi KL, Katerberg H, Stewart SE, Denys DA, Lochner C, Stack DE, den Boer JA, van Balkom AJ, Jenike MA, Stein DJ, Cath DC, Mathews CA (2011) Latent class analysis of the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale symptoms in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Compr Psychiatry 52:334–341PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Derogatis RL (1977) Symptom Checklist 90, R-version manual I: scoring, administration, and procedures for the SCL-90. Johns Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- 22.Falret JP (1866) Discussion sur la folie raisonnante. Ann Med Psychol 24:382–426Google Scholar
- 25.Firmann M, Mayor V, Vidal PM, Bochud M, Pecoud A, Hayoz D, Paccaud F, Preisig M, Song KS, Yuan X, Danoff TM, Stirnadel HA, Waterworth D, Mooser V, Waeber G, Vollenweider P (2008) The CoLaus study: a population-based study to investigate the epidemiology and genetic determinants of cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 8:6PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Hantouche EG, Lancrenon S (1996) Modern typology of symptoms and obsessive–compulsive syndromes: results of a large French study of 615 patients. L'Encéphale 22 Spec No 1:9–21Google Scholar
- 34.Katerberg H, Delucchi KL, Stewart SE, Lochner C, Denys DA, Stack DE, Andresen JM, Grant JE, Kim SW, Williams KA, den Boer JA, van Balkom AJ, Smit JH, van Oppen P, Polman A, Jenike MA, Stein DJ, Mathews CA, Cath DC (2010) Symptom dimensions in OCD: item-level factor analysis and heritability estimates. Behav Genet 40:505–517PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2012) Mplus User’s Guide. 7th edn. In: Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
- 46.Nurnberger JI Jr, Blehar MC, Kaufmann CA, York-Cooler C, Simpson SG, Harkavy-Friedman J, Severe JB, Malaspina D, Reich T (1994) Diagnostic interview for genetic studies. Rationale, unique features, and training. NIMH genetics initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:849–859 discussion 863–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.Preisig M, Waeber G, Vollenweider P, Bovet P, Rothen S, Vandeleur C, Guex P, Middleton L, Waterworth D, Mooser V, Tozzi F, Muglia P (2009) The PsyCoLaus study: methodology and characteristics of the sample of a population-based survey on psychiatric disorders and their association with genetic and cardiovascular risk factors. BMC Psychiatry 9:9PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.Retz-Junginger P, Retz W, Blocher D, Stieglitz RD, Georg T, Supprian T, Wender PH, Rosler M (2003) Reliability and validity of the Wender-Utah-Rating-Scale short form. Retrospective assessment of symptoms for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nervenarzt 74:987–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 55.Rosler M, Retz W, Retz-Junginger P, Thome J, Supprian T, Nissen T, Stieglitz RD, Blocher D, Hengesch G, Trott GE (2004) Tools for the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Self-rating behaviour questionnaire and diagnostic checklist. Nervenarzt 75:888–895CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 57.Rossler W, Ajdacic-Gross V, Haker H, Rodgers S, Muller M, Hengartner MP (2015) Subclinical psychosis syndromes in the general population: results from a large-scale epidemiological survey among residents of the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 24:69–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 70.Wulff H (2006) Childhood trauma questionnaire. Entwicklung einer deutschsprachigen version und überprüfung bei psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutisch behandelten patienten. Universität Lübeck, LübeckGoogle Scholar