Improving outpatient treatment in schizophrenia: effects of computerized guideline implementation—results of a multicenter-study within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia

  • B. Janssen
  • S. Ludwig
  • H. Eustermann
  • R. Menke
  • M. Haerter
  • M. Berger
  • G. Adam
  • U. Seemann
  • W. Kissling
  • W. Gaebel
Original Paper

Abstract

Schizophrenia clinical practice guidelines are developed to provide expert- and evidence-based advice to practicing psychiatrists in order to improve the management of this disorder. However, the application of these guidelines in everyday health care can still be described as nonsatisfying. Within the project “Guideline-supported quality management in outpatient treatment”, we investigated whether guideline adherence and quality of outcome can be improved by implementing a computer-based, guideline-oriented decision-support system. Therefore, a disease-specific decision-support system was developed interactively presenting guidelines to support the physicians decision-making process during the treatment of schizophrenia patients. We evaluated the system in a control group design: An experimental group consisting of 15 psychiatrists in private practice used the decision-support system, thus documenting the treatment of schizophrenic patients. Guideline-based algorithms were interactively and case specifically displayed on the PC-screen as soon as predefined triggers were met. A first control group in Munich provided treatment-as-usual, documenting the treatment via paper–pencil. Two further physician groups served as additional comparison groups: one also documented electronically using the decision-support system, however without receiving electronic guideline support, the second group carried out traditional quality circles while also using the paper–pencil approach. As a result of the intervention, we observed a strong initial but time-limited improvement with respect to the core aspects of outpatient treatment in schizophrenia in the experimental group. The findings suggest that decision-support systems, despite their limitations, can be used to enhance treatment outcome in schizophrenia outpatient care.

Keywords

Schizophrenia Private practice Computerized guidelines Treatment outcome 

References

  1. 1.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde [DGPPN] (eds) (1998) Behandlungsleitlinie Schizophrenie (Praxisleitlinien in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Bd 1). Steinkopff, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gaebel W, Weinmann S, Sartorius N, Rutz W, McIntyre JS (2005) Schizophrenia practice guidelines: international survey and comparison. Br J Psychiatry 187:248–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collaboration The AGREE (2003) Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 12:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    AHCPR( 1997) AHCPR, AAHP, and AMA to develop a national clinical guideline clearinghouse. http://www.scienceblog.com/community/archives/A/hhs1680.htm
  5. 5.
    Ollenschläger G, Thomaczek C, Kirchner H (2001) The German Guidelines Clearing House (GGC): rationale, aims and results. Proc R Coll Phys Edinb 31(Suppl 9):59–64Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamann J, Langer B, Leucht S, Busch R, Kissling W (2004) Medical decision making in antipsychotic drug choice for Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 161(7):1301–1304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grol R (1997) Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 315:418–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hölzer S, Schweiger R, Dudeck J (2001) Current approaches for the implementation of guidelines by means of information technologies. Z ärztl Fortbild Qual sich 95:555–559Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF (2005) Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330(7494):765 [Epub 14 March 2005]Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Janssen B, Menke R, Pourhassan F, Geßner-Özokyay D, Peters R, Gaebel W (2006) Leitlinienimplementierung auf der Basis eines computergestützten decision-support-systems—ein Beitrag zum Qualitätsmanagement in der ambulanten nervenärztlichen Schizophreniebehandlung. Nervenarzt 77:567–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixon L, Scott J, Lyles A, Fahey M, Skinner A, Shore A (1997) Adherence to schizophrenia port family treatment recommendations. Schizophr Res 24(1–2):221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lehman AF, Steinwachs DM (1998) At issue: translating research into practice: the schizophrenia patient outcomes research team (PORT) treatment recommendations. Schizophr Bull 243(1):1–10Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kay SR (1991) Positive and negative syndromes in schizophrenia. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Startup M, Jackson C, Bendix S (2002) The concurrent validity of the global assessment of functioning (GAF). Br J Clin Psychol 41:417–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haro JM, Kamath SA, Ochoa S, Novick D, Rele K, Fargas A, Rodriguez MJ, Rele R, Orta J, Kharbeng A, Araya S, Gervin M, Alonso J, Mavreas V, Lavrentzou E, Lionto N, Gregor K, Jones PB (2003) The clinical global impression-schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 107(Suppl 416):16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomson RG, McElroy H, Kazandijan VA (1997) Maryland Hospital Quality Indicator Project in the United States: an approach for promoting continuous quality improvement. Qual Health Care 6:49–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cording C (1995) Basisdokumentation und Ergebnisqualität. In: Gaebel W (ed) Qualitätssicherung im psychiatrischen Krankenhaus. Springer, New York, pp 173–181Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Joubert AF (2001) PQM: psychiatry quality measurement. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 16(Suppl 3):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tausch B, Haerter M (2001) Perceived effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines in primary care quality circles. Int J Qual Health Care 13(3):239–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hoppe JD (2004) A good clinical guideline is an orientational tool, not a checklist. ZaeFQ 98:174–175Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kienzle J (2004) Fragmentation of the doctor-patient relationship as a result of standardization and economisation. Z ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundh Wes 98:193–199Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Farquhar CM, Kofa EW, Slutsky JR (2002) Clinicians’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Med J Aust 177(9):502–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miller AL, Crismon ML, Rush AJ, Chiles J, Kashner TM, Toprac M, Carmody T, Biggs M, Shores-Wilson K, Childes J, Witte B, Bow-Thomas C, Velligan DI, Trivedi M, Suppes T, Shon S (2004) The Texas medication algorithm project: clinical results for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 30(3):627–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldstein MJ (1995) Psychoeducation and relapse prevention. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 9(Suppl 5):59–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fernandez I, De Hert M, Wampers M, Thys E, Wyckaert S, Peuskens J (2003) Guidelines adherence in treated schizophrenic patients. Schizophr Res 60(Suppl 1):283Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kane JM (2003) PORT recommendations. Schizophr Bull 30(3):605–607Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lobach DF, Kerner N (2000) A systematic process for converting text-based guidelines into a linear algorithm for electronic implementation. Proc AMIA Symp 507–511Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N (2005) Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 58(2):107–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Janssen
    • 1
  • S. Ludwig
    • 1
  • H. Eustermann
    • 1
  • R. Menke
    • 1
  • M. Haerter
    • 2
  • M. Berger
    • 2
  • G. Adam
    • 2
  • U. Seemann
    • 3
  • W. Kissling
    • 3
  • W. Gaebel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyHeinrich-Heine-University DuesseldorfDuesseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyTechnical University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations