What is a psychosis and where is it located?
- 373 Downloads
Kraepelin’s dichotomy, manic-depressive insanity and dementia praecox, are contrasting and true endogenous disease entities which affect excitability, the fundamental property of the CNS. Kraepelin wanted to establish a valid classification and hit the extremes in brain structure and function at a time when we had no knowledge of brain dysfunction in “functional” psychoses. The aetiology is now known: the psychoses are part of human growth and maturation and might be classified according to their brain dysfunction, which is exactly what Kraepelin wanted. However, presumably to reduce the stigma attached to the word “psychosis”, there is currently a strong initiative to eliminate the concept. But knowledge of what is happening in the brain in a psychosis might be more helpful in reducing stigma. It is suggested that psychosis is due to an affection of the supplementary motor area (SMA), located at the centre of the Medial Frontal Lobe network. The SMA is one of the rare universally connected areas of the brain, as should be the case for such a key structure that makes decisions as to the right moment for action. This important network, which partly has continuous neurogenesis, has sufficiently widespread connections. The SMA, a premotor area located on the medial side of the frontal lobes, is one of the last regions to reach a concurrence of synaptogenesis. An affection of the SMA, a deficient or abolished Delayed Response Task, seriously disturbs our relation and adaptation to the surroundings. We usually master the Delayed Response Task around the age of 7 months, a time at which the second CNS regressive event takes place, which proceeds from the posterior to the anterior of the brain. In very late maturation, a persistent affection of the SMA might occur. We experience a chronic psychosis: infantile autism (IA), a chronic inability to act consciously, which contrasts with the episodic SMA affection post-puberty, when excitation is reduced due to excessive pruning of excitatory synapses. Silent spots are the result of insufficient fill-in mechanisms following a breakdown of circuitry. They may affect the SMA in the case of very late puberty. An acute reduction in excitation and concomitantly a marked increase in silent spots might lead to an acute psychosis. A frontal preference is likely, given that a reduction might occur anywhere in the cortex, but particularly in the areas maturing latest. The varying localisations probably explain the difficulty in accepting schizophrenia as a disease entity. The multifactorial inheritance of the dichotomy implies that the genetics are not fate, a psychotic development might be prevented given enough epigenetic factors: brain food (omega 3). Might the present dietary adversity, with its lack of brain food, be responsible for a rising incidence in psychosis? A psychosis is an understandable and preventable dysfunction of the brain, and its mechanisms are known. Primarily a disorder of reduced excitation in an attenuated CNS, this explains why all the neuroleptics are convulsants, raising excitation, in contrast to all antidepressives, which are anti-epileptic.
Key wordspsychosis medial frontal lobe system Autism regressive events
Professor Saugstad has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 1.Bleuler E (1911) Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias. Translated by J. Zinkin, 1950, International University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 6.Haug J (1962) Pneumoencephalographic studies in mental disease. Acta Psychiat Scand Suppl 165:1–104Google Scholar
- 8.Hirsch RH (1991) Affective symptoms in schizophrenia, basic, prodromal and residual: implications for a functional approach to diagnosis. In: Kerr A, McClelland H (eds) Concepts of mental disorder, A Continuing Debate, Gaskell, Royal College of Psychiatry, pp 66–73Google Scholar
- 11.Klosterkötter J (1994) Warning signs and symptoms in schizophrenia. In: Saugstad LF (ed) Psychiatry and mental health, the legacy of Ørnulv Ødegård, pp 113–136Google Scholar
- 12.Kornhuber HH, Deecke L (1985) The starting function of the SMA. In: Goldberg G (ed) Supplementary motor area structure and function. Review and hypotheses. Behav Brain Sci 8:567–616Google Scholar
- 14.Mauz F (1930) Die Prognostik der Endogenen Psychosen. Leipzig, ThiemeGoogle Scholar
- 16.Minkowski E (1926) La Notion de Perte de Contact Vital avec la Realité, et ses Applications en Psychopathologie. Jouve & Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 17.Mortensen PB, Pederssen CB, Westergård et al (1999) Effect of family place and season of birth on the risk of schizophrenia. New Engl J Med 340:603–608Google Scholar
- 19.Rumke HC (1942) Das Kernsympton der Schizophrenia and “das Praecox Gefühl”. Zentralbl Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr. 102:168–169Google Scholar
- 22.Saugstad LF (1994) The maturational theory of brain development and cerebral excitability in the multifactorially inherited manic-depressive psychosis and schizophrenia. Int J Psychophysiol 18(3), December, special issue: Developmental psychophysiology, 189–203Google Scholar
- 23.Saugstad LF (2006) From genetics to epigenetics. Nutr Health 18:285–300Google Scholar
- 24.Saugstad LF (2006) Are neurodegenerative disorder and psychotic manifestations avoidable brain dysfunctions with adequate dietary omega-3? Nutr Health 18:203–215Google Scholar
- 25.Saugstad LF (2007) Kraepelin’s dichotomy is true: contrasting brain dysfunction at the extremes, excitability, a fundamental property of nervous tissue, is affected. World J Biol Psychiatry Sept 17, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
- 26.Saugstad LF (2007) Postnatal susceptibility to seizures (submitted)Google Scholar
- 28.Saugstad & Ødegård (1985) In defence of international classification. Psycol Med 15:1–2Google Scholar
- 29.Shepard M (1995) Two faces of Emil Kraepelin. Br J Psychiatry 167:174–183Google Scholar
- 30.Strømgren E (1987) Autism Eur J Psychiat 1:45–54Google Scholar
- 31.Strømgren E (1991) A European perspective on the conceptual approaches to psychopathology. In: Kerr A, McClelland H (eds) Concepts of mental disorders, Gaskell, Royal College of Psychiatry, pp 84–90Google Scholar