The DSM-V initiative “deconstructing psychosis” in the context of Kraepelin’s concept on nosology

POINTS OF VIEW/FORMULATION

Abstract

The revision process of the international psychiatric classification systems has started and is expected to result in new versions of the International Classification of Disorders (then ICD-11) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (then DSM-V) in approximately 2014 and 2012, respectively. In the process of developing DSM-V, several research conferences jointly sponsored by the American Psychiatric Association, the National Institutes of Health, and the World Health Organization, are currently taking place. We will here focus on the impact that the DSM-V initiative “Deconstructing Psychosis” will have on the future of diagnosing a psychotic state, and how this may be viewed from a European context of Kraepelin’s nosology of psychiatric disorders.

Key words

DSM-V Kraepelin’s dichotomy psychiatric classification modularity modular psychiatry 

References

  1. 1.
    Allardyce J, Gaebel W, Zielasek J, Van Os J (2007) Deconstructing psychosis conference February 2006: the validity of schizophrenia and alternative approaches to the classification of psychosis. Schizophr Bull 33:863–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreasen NC (2007) DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: an example of unintended consequences. Schizophr Bull 33:108–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benes FM (2007) Searching for unique endophenotypes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder within neural circuits and their molecular regulatory mechanisms. Schizophr Bull, 33:932–936Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bentall P (2006) Madness explained. Why we must reject the Kraepelinian paradigm and replace it with a “complaint-orientated” approach to understanding mental illness. Med Hypotheses 66:220–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brase CL (2002) Mental modularity, metaphors, and the marriage of evolutionary and cognitive sciences. Cogn Process 3–4:3–17Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Craddock N, Owen MJ (2005) The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy. Br J Psychiatry 186:364–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Craddock N, Owen MJ (2007) Rethinking psychosis: the disadvantages of a dichotomous classification now outweigh the advantages. World Psychiatry 6:20–27Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duchaine B, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2001) Evolutionary psychology and the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dutta R, Greene T, Addington J, McKenzie K, Phillips M, Murray RM (2007) Biological, life course, and cross-cultural studies all point toward the value of dimensional and developmental ratings in the classification of psychosis. Schizophr Bull, 33:868–876Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    First MB (2006) Deconstructing psychosis. Online document at http://dsm5.org/conference5.cfm; last accessed July 1, 2007
  11. 11.
    First MB, Pincus HA, Levone JB, Williams JBW, Üstün B, Peele R (2004) Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry 161:946–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freedman R (2007) Neuronal dysfunction and schizophrenia symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 164:385–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gaebel W, Wölwer W, Zielasek J (2006) From descriptive to functional psychopathology: on the way towards a modular psychiatry. Die Psychiatrie 3:221–232Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ginsburg BE, Werick TM, Escobar JI, Kugelmass S, Treaner JJ, Wendtland L (1996) Molecular genetics of psychopathologies: a search for simple answers to complex problems. Behav Genet 26:325–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Go RC, Perry RT, Wiener H, Bassett SS, Blacker D, Devlin B, Sweet RA (2005) Neuregulin-1 polymorphism in late onset Alzheimer’s disease families with psychoses. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 139:28–32Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gur RE, Keshavan MS and Lawrie SM (2007) Deconstructing psychosis with human brain imaging. Schizophr Bull, 33:921–931Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hallmayer JF, Kalaydjieva L, Badcock J, Dragovic M, Howell S, Michie PT, Rock D, Vile D, Williams R, Corder EH, Hollingsworth K, Jablensky A (2005) Genetic evidence for a distinct subtype of schizophrenia characterized by pervasive cognitive deficit. Am J Hum Genet 77:468–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoff P (1988) Nosologische Grundpostulate bei Kraepelin. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother 36:328–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jablensky A (1999) The nature of psychiatric classification: issues beyond ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 33:137–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jablensky A (2004) Resolving schizophrenia’s CATCH22. Nat Genet 36:674–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jablensky A (2005) Categories, dimensions and prototypes: critical issues for psychiatric classification. Psychopathology 38:201–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keefe RSE, Fenton WS (2007) How should DSM-V criteria for schizophrenia include cognitive impairment? Schizophr Bull, 33:912–920Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kendler KS (2006) Reflections on the relationship between psychiatric genetics and psychiatric nosology. Am J Psychiatry 163:1138–1146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kraepelin E (1920) Die Erscheinungsformen des Irreseins. Z Ges Neurol Psychiatr 62:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kupfer DJ, First MB, Regier DA (eds) (2002) A research agenda for DSM-V. American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levin T (2006) Schizophrenia should be renamed to help educate patients and the public. Int J Soc Psychiatry 52:324–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McGorry PD (2007) Issues for DSM-V: clinical staging: a heuristic pathway to valid nosology and safer, more effective treatment in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 164:859–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murphy D, Stich S (2000) Darwin in the madhouse: evolutionary psychology and the classification of mental disorders. In: Carruthers P, Chamberlain A (eds) Evolution and the human mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 62–92Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Owen MJ, Craddock N, Jablensky A (2007) The genetic deconstruction of psychosis. Schizophr Bull, 33:905–911Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peralta V, Cuesta MJ (2003) The diagnosis of schizophrenia: Old wine in new bottles. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther 3:141–152Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Phillips ML, Vieta E (2007) Identifying functional neuroimaging biomarkers of bipolar disorders: toward DSM-V. Schizophr Bull, 33:893–904Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Regier DA (2007) Time for a fresh start? Rethinking psychosis in DSM-V. Schizophr Bull, 33:843–845Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Regier DA, Sirovatka P, Rubio-Stipec M, Narrow WE (2007) The future of psychiatric diagnosis: the APA/WHO/NIH research planning process for DSM and ICD. Die Psychiatrie 4:98–104Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ross CA, Margolis RL, Reading SA, Pletnikov M, Coyle JT (2006) Neurobiology of schizophrenia. Neuron 52:139–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Saraceno B, Saxena S (2007) Issues around work on the classification of mental and behavioural disorders in world health organization. Die Psychiatrie 4:86–91Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sartorius N (2007) Zukunftsperspektiven der Klassifikation psychischer Störungen. Die Psychiatrie 4:75–76Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sato M (2006) Renaming schizophrenia: a Japanese perspective. World Psychiatry 5:53–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schneider K (1959) Clinical pathology. Translated by Hamilton MW. Grune & Stratton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Thaker GK (2007) Endophenotypic studies in schizophrenia: promise and challenges. Schizophr Bull 33:1–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tsuang MT, Stone WS, Faraone SV (2000) Toward reformulating the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 157:1041–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Üstün TB, Jakob R (2007) The development of the 11th revision of the ICD: trends and challenges. Die Psychiatrie 4:77–85Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wölwer W, Frommann N, Halfmann S, Piaszek A, Streit M, Gaebel W (2005) Remediations of impairments in facial affect recognition in schizophrenia: efficacy and specificity of a new training program. Schizophr Res 80:295–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zacher P, Kandler KS (2007) Psychiatric disorders: a conceptual taxonomy. Am J Psychiatry 164:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und PsychotherapieHeinrich-Heine-Universität, Rheinische Kliniken DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations