Involuntary vs. voluntary hospital admission
- 1.7k Downloads
This article systematically reviews the literature on the outcome of acute hospitalization for adult general psychiatric patients admitted involuntarily as compared to patients admitted voluntarily. Inclusion and exclusion criteria qualified 41 out of 3,227 references found in Medline and PSYNDEXplus literature searches for this review. The authors independently rated these articles on six pre-defined indicators of research quality, carried out statistical comparisons ex-post facto where not reported, and computed for each adequate result the effect size index d for the comparison of means, and the Phi- or contingency coefficient for cross-tabulated data. Methodological quality of the studies, coming mostly from North American and European countries, showed significant variation and was higher concerning service-related than clinical or subjective outcomes. Main deficits appeared in sample size estimation, lack of clear follow-up time-points, and the absence of standardized instruments used to assess clinical outcomes. Length of stay, readmission risk, and risk of involuntary readmission were at least equal or greater for involuntary patients. Involuntary patients showed no increased mortality, but did have higher suicide rates than voluntary patients. Further, involuntary patients demonstrated lower levels of social functioning, and equal levels of general psychopathology and treatment compliance; they were more dissatisfied with treatment and more frequently felt that hospitalization was not justified. Future methodologically-sound studies exploring this topic should focus on patient populations not represented here. Further research should also clarify if the legal admission status is sufficiently valid for differentiating the outcome of acute hospitalization.
Key wordsinvoluntary hospital admission acute hospitalization adult general psychiatry outcome literature review
The multi-site research project “European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice” (acronym: EUNOMIA) was funded by the European Commission (Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources Programme, contract no. QLG4-CT-2002-01036). The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance in text editing from Charlene Reiss.
- 2.Becker T, Bauer M, Rutz W, Aktion Psychisch Kranke (eds) (2001) Psychiatric reform in Europe. Acta Psychiatr Scand 104(suppl 410):8–14Google Scholar
- 14.Health & Consumer Protection Directorate General of the European Commission (2005) Green Paper. Improving the mental health of the population: towards a strategy on mental health for the European Union. European Communities, Brussels, COM (2005) 484Google Scholar
- 18.Kallert TW, Torres-González F (eds) (2006) Legislation on coercive mental health care in Europe. Legal documents and comparative assessment of twelve European countries. Peter Lang Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt/MGoogle Scholar
- 22.Katsakou C, Priebe S (2007) Patient’s experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: A review of qualitative studies. Epidemiol Psychiatr Soc 16:172–178Google Scholar
- 23.Kjellin L, Westrin CG, Eriksson K, Axelsson-Östman M, Candefjord IL, Ekblom B, Machl M, Ängfors G, Östman O (1993) Coercion in psychiatric care: problems of medical ethics in a comprehensive empirical study. Behav Sci Law 11:323–334Google Scholar
- 31.Modestin J, Hanselmann F, Rueesch P, Gruenwald H, Meyer P (2003) Zurich psychiatric care satisfaction questionnaire: development and characteristics (in German). Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr 154:127–138Google Scholar
- 39.Pieters V (2003) Macht - Zwang - Sinn. Subjektives Erleben, Behandlungsbewertungen und Therapieerfolge bei gerichtlichen Unterbringungen schizophrener Menschen. Psychiatrie-Verlag, BonnGoogle Scholar
- 56.Waller H, Bauer M, Berner W, Katschnig H, Uchtenhagen A (1982) Zwangseinweisung in der Psychiatrie - Zur Situation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, in Österreich und in der Schweiz. Hans Huber, Bern Stuttgart Wien, pp 103–151Google Scholar
- 57.Westrin CG, Nilstun T, Axelsson M, Candefjord IL, Kjellin L, Ekblom B, Eriksson K, Östman O (1990) An empirical study of commitment and involuntary treatment in Sweden. In: Stefanis CN (ed) Psychiatry: a world perspective, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 789–803Google Scholar
- 58.Working Party on Psychiatry and Human Rights (2000) “White paper” on the protection of the human rights and dignity of people suffering from mental disorder, especially those placed as involuntary patients in a psychiatric establishment. Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, BrusselsGoogle Scholar