An attachment-based model of complicated grief including the role of avoidance
- 1.2k Downloads
Complicated grief is a prolonged grief disorder with elements of a stress response syndrome. We have previously proposed a biobehavioral model showing the pathway to complicated grief. Avoidance is a component that can be difficult to assess and pivotal to treatment. Therefore we developed an avoidance questionnaire to characterize avoidance among patients with CG.
We further explain our complicated grief model and provide results of a study of 128 participants in a treatment study of CG who completed a 15-item Grief-related Avoidance Questionnaire (GRAQ).
Results of Avoidance Assessment
Mean (SD) GRAQ score was 25. 0 ± 12.5 with a range of 0–60. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.87 and test re-test correlation was 0.88. Correlation analyses showed good convergent and discriminant validity. Avoidance of reminders of the loss contributed to functional impairment after controlling for other symptoms of complicated grief.
In this paper we extend our previously described attachment-based biobehavioral model of CG. We envision CG as a stress response syndrome that results from failure to integrate information about death of an attachment figure into an effectively functioning secure base schema and/or to effectively re-engage the exploratory system in a world without the deceased. Avoidance is a key element of the model.
Key wordscomplicated grief attachment avoidance behaviour
This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health: MH60783, AG020677, AG13396, P30MH30915, and P30MH52247.
- 1.Boelen PA, van den Bout J, van den Hout M (2003a) The role of negative interpretations of grief reactions in emotional problems after bereavement. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatr 34:225–238Google Scholar
- 2.Boelen PA, van den Bout J, van den Hout MA (2003b) The role of cognitive variables in psychological functioning after the death of a first degree relative. Behav Res Ther 41:1123–1136Google Scholar
- 6.Bowlby J (1969) Attachment and Loss. In Attachment. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bowlby J (1980) Attachment and Loss, Vol. III: Loss. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bretherton I, Munholland KA (1999) Internal working models in attachment relationships: a construct revisited. In Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds), Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications. Guilford Press, New York, pp 89–114Google Scholar
- 14.First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB (1996) Structured clinical interview for DSM IV axis I disorders. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosur Ps 25:56–67Google Scholar
- 19.Harkness K, Shear MK, Frank E, Silberman R (2002) Complicated grief treatment: case histories of four patients. J Clin Psychiatr 63:1113–1120Google Scholar
- 20.Hazan C, Zeifman D (1999). Pair bonds as attachments: evaluating the evidence. In Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds), Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications. Guilford Press, New York, pp 336–354Google Scholar
- 23.Horowitz MJ (1976) Title Stress response syndromes. Oxford, England: Jason AronsonGoogle Scholar
- 25.Horowitz MJ, Siegel B, Holen A, Bonanno GA (1997) Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorder. Am J Psych 154:904–910Google Scholar
- 26.Janoff-Bulman R (1992) Shattered assumptions. Free Press, New York NYGoogle Scholar
- 28.Lewis CS (1961) A grief observed. HarperCollins, NYGoogle Scholar
- 36.Pasternak RE, Reynolds CF, Schlernitzauer M, Hoch CC, et al. (1991) J Clin Psychiatr 52:307–310Google Scholar
- 37.Polan HJ, Hofer MA (1999) Psychobiological origins of infant attachment and separation responses. In Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds), Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications. Guilford Press, New York, pp 162–180Google Scholar
- 42.Reynolds, Charles F, Hoch, Carolyn C, Buysse, Daniel J, Houck, Patricia R, et al. (1992) Electroencephalographic sleep in spousal bereavement and bereavement-related depression of late life. Biol Psychiatr 31:69–82Google Scholar
- 43.Shear MK, Frank E, Foa E, Cherry C, Reynolds CF 3rd, Vander Bilt J, Masters S (2001b) Traumatic grief treatment: a pilot study. Am J Psychiatr 158:1506–1508Google Scholar
- 47.Shear MK, Vander Bilt J, Rucci P, Endicott J, Lydiard B, Otto MW, Pollack MH, Chandler L, Williams J, Ali A, Frank DM (2001a) Reliability and Validity of a Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (SIGH-A). Depress Anxiety 13:166–178Google Scholar
- 55.Zygmont M, Prigerson HG, Houck PR, Miller MD, Shear MK, Jacobs S, Reynolds CF 3rd (1998) A post hoc comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline for symptoms of traumatic grief. J Clin Psychiatr 59:241–245Google Scholar