An attachment-based model of complicated grief including the role of avoidance

  • Katherine Shear
  • Timothy Monk
  • Patricia Houck
  • Nadine Melhem
  • Ellen Frank
  • Charles Reynolds
  • Russell Sillowash
SPECIAL ISSUE

Abstract

Introduction

Complicated grief is a prolonged grief disorder with elements of a stress response syndrome. We have previously proposed a biobehavioral model showing the pathway to complicated grief. Avoidance is a component that can be difficult to assess and pivotal to treatment. Therefore we developed an avoidance questionnaire to characterize avoidance among patients with CG.

Methods

We further explain our complicated grief model and provide results of a study of 128 participants in a treatment study of CG who completed a 15-item Grief-related Avoidance Questionnaire (GRAQ).

Results of Avoidance Assessment

Mean (SD) GRAQ score was 25. 0 ± 12.5 with a range of 0–60. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.87 and test re-test correlation was 0.88. Correlation analyses showed good convergent and discriminant validity. Avoidance of reminders of the loss contributed to functional impairment after controlling for other symptoms of complicated grief.

Discussion

In this paper we extend our previously described attachment-based biobehavioral model of CG. We envision CG as a stress response syndrome that results from failure to integrate information about death of an attachment figure into an effectively functioning secure base schema and/or to effectively re-engage the exploratory system in a world without the deceased. Avoidance is a key element of the model.

Key words

complicated grief attachment avoidance behaviour 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health: MH60783, AG020677, AG13396, P30MH30915, and P30MH52247.

References

  1. 1.
    Boelen PA, van den Bout J, van den Hout M (2003a) The role of negative interpretations of grief reactions in emotional problems after bereavement. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatr 34:225–238Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boelen PA, van den Bout J, van den Hout MA (2003b) The role of cognitive variables in psychological functioning after the death of a first degree relative. Behav Res Ther 41:1123–1136Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boelen PA, van den Bout J, van den Hout MA (2006) Negative cognitions and avoidance in emotional problems after bereavement: a prospective study. Behav Res Ther 44:1657–1672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonanno GA (2004) Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol 59:20–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonanno GA, Papa A, Lalande K, Zhang N, Noll JG (2005) Grief processing and deliberate grief avoidance: a prospective comparison of bereaved spouses and parents in the United States and the People’s Republic of China. J Consult Clin Psychol 73:86–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bowlby J (1969) Attachment and Loss. In Attachment. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bowlby J (1980) Attachment and Loss, Vol. III: Loss. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowlby J (1982) Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthopsychiat 52:664–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bretherton I, Munholland KA (1999) Internal working models in attachment relationships: a construct revisited. In Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds), Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications. Guilford Press, New York, pp 89–114Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): a new instrument for psychiatric research and practice. Psychiatr Res 28:193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deci EL, La Guardia JG, Moller AC, Scheiner MJ, Ryan RM (2006) On the benefits of giving as well as receiving autonomy support: mutuality in close friendships. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32:313–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ehlers A (2006) Understanding and treating complicated grief: what can we learn from posttraumatic stress disorder? Clin Psychol: Sci Prac 13:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feeney BC (2004) A secure base: responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 87:631–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB (1996) Structured clinical interview for DSM IV axis I disorders. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fraley RC, Davis K (1997) Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Pers Relationship 4:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Germain A, Shear K, Monk TH, Houck PR, Reynolds CF III, Frank E, Buysse DJ (2006) Treating complicated grief: effects on sleep quality. Behav Sleep Med 4:152–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hall MH, Buysse DJ, Dew MA, Prigerson HG, Kupfer DJ, Reynolds CF (1997) Intrusive thoughts and avoidance behaviors are associated with sleep disturbances in bereavement-related depression. Depress Anxiety 6(3):106–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosur Ps 25:56–67Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harkness K, Shear MK, Frank E, Silberman R (2002) Complicated grief treatment: case histories of four patients. J Clin Psychiatr 63:1113–1120Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hazan C, Zeifman D (1999). Pair bonds as attachments: evaluating the evidence. In Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds), Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications. Guilford Press, New York, pp 336–354Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hofer MA (1984) Relationships as regulators: a psychobiologic perspective on bereavement. Psychosom Med 46:183–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hofer MA (1996) On the nature and consequences of early loss. Psychosom Med 58:570–581 [Review 50 refs]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horowitz MJ (1976) Title Stress response syndromes. Oxford, England: Jason AronsonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W (1979) Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 41:209–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Horowitz MJ, Siegel B, Holen A, Bonanno GA (1997) Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorder. Am J Psych 154:904–910Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Janoff-Bulman R (1992) Shattered assumptions. Free Press, New York NYGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Langner R, Maercker A (2005) Complicated grief as a stress response disorder: evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample. J Psychosomatic Res 58:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lewis CS (1961) A grief observed. HarperCollins, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Melhem N, Shear MK, Rosales C, Reynolds C, Frank E, Karageorge J (2001) Comorbidity of axis 1 disorders in patients with complicated grief. J Clin Psychiat 62(11):884–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Melhem NM, Day N, Shear MK, Day R, Reynolds CF 3rd, Brent D (2004) Traumatic grief among adolescents exposed to a peer’s suicide. Am J Psychiatr 161:1411–1416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mikulincer M, Gillath O, Shaver PR (2002) Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:881–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Pereg D (2003) Attachment theory and affect regulation: the dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motiv Emotion 27:77–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Monk TH, Houck PR, Shear MK (2006) The daily life of complicated grief patients–What gets missed, what gets added? Death Stud 30:77–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JH (2002) The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatr 180:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ottenbreit N, Dobson K (2004) Avoidance and depression: the construction of the Cognitive–Behavioral Avoidance Scale. Behav Res Ther 42:293–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pasternak RE, Reynolds CF, Schlernitzauer M, Hoch CC, et al. (1991) J Clin Psychiatr 52:307–310Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Polan HJ, Hofer MA (1999) Psychobiological origins of infant attachment and separation responses. In Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds), Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications. Guilford Press, New York, pp 162–180Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prigerson HG, et al. (1995) Inventory of Complicated Grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatr Res 59:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Prigerson HG, Monk TH, Reynolds CF, Begley A, Houck PR, Bierhals A, Kupfer DJ (1995–6) Lifestyle regularity and activity level as protective factors against bereavement-related depression in late life. Depression 3(6):297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Prigerson HG, Shear MK, Jacobs SC, Reynolds CF, Maciejewski PK, Davidson JRT, Pilkonis PA, Wortman CB, Williams JBW, Widiger TA, Frank E, Kupfer DJ, Zisook S (1999) Consensus criteria for Complicated grief. Br J Psychiatr 174:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reynolds CF, et al. (1999) Treatment of bereavement-related major depressive episodes in later life: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of acute and continuation treatment with nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatr 156:202–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reynolds, Charles F, Hoch, Carolyn C, Buysse, Daniel J, Houck, Patricia R, et al. (1992) Electroencephalographic sleep in spousal bereavement and bereavement-related depression of late life. Biol Psychiatr 31:69–82Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shear MK, Frank E, Foa E, Cherry C, Reynolds CF 3rd, Vander Bilt J, Masters S (2001b) Traumatic grief treatment: a pilot study. Am J Psychiatr 158:1506–1508Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shear K, Frank E, Houck P, Reynolds CF (2005) Treatment of Complicated Grief: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 293(21):2601–2608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shear K, Jackson C, Essock S, Donahue S, Felton C (2006) Screening for complicated grief among Project Liberty service recipients after September 11th. Psychiatr Ser 57:1291–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shear MK, Shair H (2005) Attachment, loss and complicated grief. Dev Psychobiol 47:253–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shear MK, Vander Bilt J, Rucci P, Endicott J, Lydiard B, Otto MW, Pollack MH, Chandler L, Williams J, Ali A, Frank DM (2001a) Reliability and Validity of a Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (SIGH-A). Depress Anxiety 13:166–178Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Simon NM, Pollack MH, Fischmann BA, Perlman CA, Muriel A, Moore CW, Nierenberg AA, Shear K (2005) Complicated grief and its correlates in patients with bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatr 66:1105–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stroebe M, Schut H (1999) The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description. Death Stud 23:197–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Szanto K, Prigerson HG, Houck PR, Reynolds CF (1997) Suicidal ideation in elderly bereaved: the role of complicated grief. Suicide Life Threat Behav 27(2):194–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Szanto K, Shear K, Houck P, Reynolds CF, Frank E, Caroff K, Silowash R (2006) Indirect self-destructive behavior and overt suicidality in patients with traumatic grief. J Clin Psychiatr 67:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Waters HS, Waters E (2006) The attachment working models concept: among other things, we build script-like representations of secure base experiences. Attach Hum Dev 3:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zisook S, Chentsova-Dutton Y, Shuchter SR (1998) PTSD following bereavement. Ann Clin Psychiatr 10:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zuckoff A, Shear MK, Frank E, Daley DC, Seligman K, Silowash R (2006) Treating complicated grief and substance use disorders: a pilot study. J Subst Abuse Treat 30:205–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zygmont M, Prigerson HG, Houck PR, Miller MD, Shear MK, Jacobs S, Reynolds CF 3rd (1998) A post hoc comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline for symptoms of traumatic grief. J Clin Psychiatr 59:241–245Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Shear
    • 1
  • Timothy Monk
    • 2
  • Patricia Houck
    • 2
  • Nadine Melhem
    • 2
  • Ellen Frank
    • 2
  • Charles Reynolds
    • 2
  • Russell Sillowash
    • 2
  1. 1.Columbia University School of Social WorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations