Advertisement

Complicated grief after traumatic loss

A 14-month follow up study
  • Anette KerstingEmail author
  • K. Kroker
  • J. Steinhard
  • K. Lüdorff
  • U. Wesselmann
  • P. Ohrmann
  • V. Arolt
  • T. Suslow
SPECIAL ISSUE

Abstract

The traumatic loss of an unborn child after TOP due to fetal malformation and/or severe chromosomal disorders in late pregnancy is a major life-event and a potential source of serious psychological problems for those women. To obtain information on the course of grief following a traumatic loss, 62 women who had undergone TOP between the 15th and 32nd gestational week were investigated in a longitudinal study design and compared with 65 women after spontaneous delivery of a full-term healthy child. Grief, posttraumatic stress, depression, anxiety and psychiatric disorders were evaluated 14 days, 6 months and 14 months after the event, implementing validated self-report and clinician rated instruments. Compared to women after spontaneous delivery, women after induced TOP were significantly more stressed regarding all psychological outcomes at all three measuring points. Especially, 14 months after TOP 13.7% of the women fulfilled all criteria of a complicated grief diagnoses following Horowitz et al. (1997, Am J Psychiat 154:7904–7910). 16.7% were diagnosed as having a manifest psychiatric disorder according to DSM-IV. All in all, 25% of these women were critically affected by the traumatic loss. TOP for fetal anomaly is to be seen as a major life event, which causes complicated grief reactions and psychiatric disorders for a substantial number of women.

Key words

trauma complicated grief TOP fetal malformation 

References

  1. 1.
    Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG (1988) Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 8:77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 4:561–571PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beutel M, Will H, Volkl K, von Rad M, Weiner H (1995) Assessment of grief exemplified pregnancy loss: development and initial results on the validity of the Munich Grief Scale Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 45(9–10):295–302. GermanPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broen AN, Moum T, Bodtker AS, Ekeberg O (2004) Psychological impact on women of miscarriage versus induced abortion: a 2-year follow-up study. Psychosom Med 66(2):265–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broen AN, Moum T, Bodtker AS, Ekeberg O (2005) The course of mental health after miscarriage and induced abortion: a longitudinal, five-year follow-up study. BMC Med 3:18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burgoine GA, Van Kirk SD, Romm J, Edelman AB, Jacobson SL, Jensen JT (2005) Comparison of perinatal grief after dilation and evacuation or labor induction in second trimester terminations for fetal anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(6):1928–1932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davies V, Gledhill J, McFadyen A, Whitlow B, Economides D (2005) Psychological outcome in women undergoing TOP for ultrasound-detected fetal anomaly in the first and second trimesters:a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:389–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    First MB, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M (1997) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV clinical version (SCID-I/CV). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forstmeier S, Maercker A (2006) Comparison of two diagnostic systems for complicated grief. J Affect Disord [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geerinck-Vercammen CR, Kanhai HHH (2003) Coping with TOP for fetal abnormality in a supportive environment. Prenatal Diagnosis 21(7):543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hautzinger M, Bailer M, Worall H, Keller F (1995) Beck-Depressions-Inventar (BDI). Testhandbuch der deutschen Ausgabe.Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horowitz MJ, Siegel B, Holen A, Bonanno GA, Milbrath C, Stinson CH (1997) Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorder. Am J Psychiat 154:7904–7910Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iles S, Gath D (1993) Psychiatric outcome of TOP for foetal abnormality. Psychol Med 23:407–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kersting A, Dorsch M, Kreulich C, Reutemann M, Ohrmann P, Baez E, Arolt V (2005) Trauma and grief 2–7 years after TOP because of fetal anomalies – a pilot study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynec 26(1):8–14Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Korenromp MJ, Christiaens GCML, van den Bout J, Mulder EJH, Hunfeld JAM, Bilardo CM, Offermans JPM, Visser GHA (2005a) Long-term psychological consequences of pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: a cross-sectional study. Prenat Diagn 25:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Korenromp M, Page-Christiaens G, van den Bout J, Mulder E, Honfeld J, Bilardo C, Offermans J, Visser G (2005b) Psychological consequences of TOP for fetal anomaly: similarities and differences between partners. Prenat Diagn 25:1226–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kramer PRL, Jarve RK, Yaron YK (1998) Determinants of parental decision after prenatal diagnosis of Down Syndrome. Am J Med Genet 79:172–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Langner R, Maercker A (2005) Complicated grief as a stress response disorder: evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample. J Psychosom Res 58(3):235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P (1981) Das state-trait-angstinventar. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maercker A, Schuetzwohl M (1998) Erfassung von psychischen Belastungsfolgen: die impact of event Skala – revidierte version (IES-R). Diagnostica 44:130–141Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mansfield C, Hopfer S, Mareau TM (1999) Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down’s Syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review. Prenat Diagn 19:808–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Reynolds CF 3rd, Bierhals AJ, Newsom JT, Fasiczka A, Frank E, Doman J, Miller M (1995) Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Res 59(1–2):65–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prigerson HG, Shear MK, Jacobs SC, Reynolds CF 3rd, Maciejewski PK, Davidson JR, Rosenheck R, Pilkonis PA, Wortman CB, Williams JB, Widiger TA, Frank E, Kupfer DJ, Zisook S (1999) Consensus criteria for traumatic grief. A preliminary empirical test. Br J Psychiatry 174:67–73, ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salvesen KA, Oyen L, Schmidt N, Malt UF, Eik-Nes SH (1997) Comparison of long-term psychological responses of women after pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies and after perinatal loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:80–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spielberger CD (1983) Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory: STAI. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Toedter LJ, Lasker JN, Alhadeff JM (1988) The perinatal grief scale: development and initial validation. Am J Orthopsychiat 58:435–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weiss DS, Marmar CR (1997) The impact of event scale – revised. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM (eds) Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. Guilford Press, New York, pp 399–411Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wittchen H-U, Wunderlich U, Gruschwitz S, Zaudig M (1997) SKID-I. strukturiertes klinisches interview fuer DSM-IV. Achse I: Psychische Stoerungen (Interviewheft). Hogrefe, GoettingenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anette Kersting
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Kroker
    • 1
  • J. Steinhard
    • 2
  • K. Lüdorff
    • 1
  • U. Wesselmann
    • 1
  • P. Ohrmann
    • 1
  • V. Arolt
    • 1
  • T. Suslow
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany
  2. 2.Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MuensterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations