Family interventions for schizophrenia in Italy: randomized controlled trial
To evaluate the effectiveness of multiple group family treatment for Schizophrenia.
Relatives were randomly provided with an informative programme (n = 50), or allocated to receive an additional support programme (n = 26). Patients did not attend the programme to overcome cultural and organizational implementation barriers. The 12 and 24 months clinical and family outcomes were assessed.
Patients’ compliance with standard care was greater at 12 months in the more intensive behavioural management group over a control group receiving treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 25). A reduction in levels of expressed emotion (EE), significantly more frequent in those receiving the additional support programme than just the informative, occurred after treatment completion. Other clinical and family outcomes did not differ. However, treatment benefits declined at 24 months, when baseline high EE was again predictive of patient’s admission and relatives were more vulnerable to objective burden. Baseline illness severity variables predicted a number of medium and long-term poor clinical outcomes.
Although family psychoeducation has been tested in a wide range of Anglo-Saxon settings, there remains need to assess outcomes more internationally. Effective family interventions for people with schizophrenia probably require continued administration of key-elements or ongoing informal support to deal with the vicissitudes of illnesses.
Keywordsschizophrenia psychoeducation family expressed emotion randomized controlled trials
- American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Bebbington P, Kuipers L (1994a) The predictive utility of expressed emotion in schizophrenia: an aggregate analysis. Psychol Med 24:707–718Google Scholar
- Bebbington P, Kuipers L (1994b) The clinical utility of expressed emotion in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 382:46–53Google Scholar
- Cazzullo CL, Clerici M, Bertrando P (1994) Future strategies in family research and intervention. Integr Psychiatry 10:20–23Google Scholar
- Grella CE, Grusky O (1989) Families of the seriously mentally ill and their satisfaction with services. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 40:831–835Google Scholar
- Leff J, Vaughn C (1985) Expressed emotion in families: its significance for mental illness. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Lefley H (2001) Impact of mental illness on families and carers. In: Thornicroft G, Szmukler G (eds) Textbook of community psychiatry. Oxford University Press, London, pp 141–154Google Scholar
- McFarlane WR, Hornby H, Dixon L, McNary S (2002) Psychoeducational multifamily groups: research and implementation in the United States. In: McFarlane WR (eds) Multifamily group treatment for severe psychiatric disorders. Guilford, New York, pp 43–60Google Scholar
- Pharoah FM, Rathbone J, Mari JJ, Streiner D (2003) Family intervention for schizophrenia. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, Art. No.: CD000088. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000088Google Scholar
- Stata Corp (2001) Stata Statistical Software, Release 7.0. Stata Corp., College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
- World Schizophrenia Fellowship (1998) Families as partners in care: a document developed to launch a strategy for the implementation of programs of family education, training, and support. World Schizophrenia Fellowship, TorontoGoogle Scholar