Regional cerebral blood flow during auditory recall in 47 subjects exposed to assaultive and non–ssaultive trauma and developing or not posttraumatic stress disorder
- First Online:
- 75 Downloads
Psychological trauma leads to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in susceptible subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) between two groups of subjects exposed to different types of traumatic stressor either developing or not developing PTSD.
Twenty subjects developing (S) and 27 not developing (NS) PTSD after being exposed to either earlier person–under–the–train accident (NA) or being assaulted in the underground environment (A) were included in the study. 99mTc–HMPAO SPECT was performed and the uptake in 29 regions of the brain (VOIs), bilaterally, was assessed. rCBF distribution was compared, using analysis of variance (ANOVA), between groups (S/NS) and type (A/NA) during a situation involving an auditory evoked re–experiencing of the traumatic event. Discriminant analysis was applied to test the concordance between clinical diagnosis and SPECT findings.
In the general analyses significant differences were found between groups and types and there was a significant hemisphere × type interaction. S showed higher CBF than NS and so did A as compared to NA, particularly in the right hemisphere. Discriminant analysis correctly classified 66% of cases (p < 0001) in testing S/NS and 72% (p < 0001) in testing NA/A.
Under recall of their traumatic experience we found higher relative CBF distribution values in S as compared to NS. CBF was higher in the right hemisphere and particularly in assaulted subjects. These findings underscore the role upon trauma recall of both the right hemisphere and the nature of the stressing event.
Key wordsPTSD assaultive trauma SPECT rCBF
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Breslau N (2001) The epidemiology of posttraumatic stress disorder: what is the extent of the problem? J Clin Psychiatry 62(Suppl 17):16–22Google Scholar
- 13.Greitz T, Bohm C, Holte S, Eriksson L (1991) A computerized brain atlas: construction, anatomical content, and some applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 53:26–38Google Scholar
- 14.Heller W, Koven NS, Miller GA (2003) Regional brain activity in anxiety and depression, cognition/emotion interaction, and emotional regulation. In: Hugdahl K, Davidsson RJ (eds) The asymmetrical brain. Bradford, London, pp 533–564Google Scholar
- 17.Kessler RC (2000) Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society. J Clin Psychiatry 61(Suppl 5):4–12Google Scholar
- 20.March JS (1993) What constitutes a stressor? The “Criterion A” issue. In:Davidsson JRT, Foa EB (eds) Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: DSM-IV and Beyond. American Press, Washington DC, pp 37–54Google Scholar
- 23.Pagani M, Salmaso D, Nardo D, Jonsson C, Danielsson AM, Jacobsson H, Larsson SA (2004) Accuracy of possible and probable Alzheimer disease diagnosis: a methodological comparison using SPM and principal component analysis. Eur J Nuc Med 31(8):S218Google Scholar
- 26.Pizzagalli D, Shackman AJ, Davidsson RJ (2003) The functional neuroimaging of human emotion: asymmetrical contributions of cortical and subcortical circuitry. In:Hugdahl K, Davidsson RJ (eds) The asymmetrical brain. Bradford, London, pp 511–532Google Scholar
- 29.Shalev AY (2001) What is post traumatic stress disorder? J Clin Psychiatry 62(Suppl):4–10Google Scholar
- 34.Tucker DM (1987) Hemispheric specialization: a mechanism for unifying anterior and posterior brain regions. In:Ottoson D (ed) Duality and unity of the Brain. MacMillan Press, London, pp 180–193Google Scholar
- 35.Van der Kolk B (1997) The psychobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 58(Supp 9):16–24Google Scholar