Intact feature fusion in schizophrenic patients

ORIGINAL PAPER
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract.

How the various features of an object are bound to a unified percept is one of the most fundamental problems the human brain has to solve. Whereas healthy observers usually do not reveal binding errors, it has been proposed that schizophrenic patients suffer from binding deficits. To elucidate such deficits, we investigated one of the most basic binding or integration paradigms: feature fusion. In feature fusion, two stimuli are presented in rapid succession. Using a vernier paradigm, we could, recently, show that the second stimulus determines feature fusion more strongly than the first one (Herzog et al. 2003). However, the first presented stimulus determines feature fusion when a grating follows the two stimuli. Reversal of dominance has occurred. In this study, we show that schizophrenic patients reveal qualitatively the same integration characteristics in feature fusion as healthy controls do. Hence, although some aspects of visual processing are strongly disturbed in schizophrenia as revealed by masking studies, feature fusion appears to be, at least qualitatively, spared. Our fusion paradigm allows one to investigate intact and deficient visual processing in schizophrenic patients with great detail and to elucidate the nature of deficits of visual processing in schizophrenia.

Key words

schizophrenia backward masking early visual processing binding problem feature fusion 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2002) http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/schzrec.htmGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreasen NC (1983) Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Iowa City, University of IowaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andreasen NC (1984) Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Iowa City, University of IowaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andreasen NC, Arndt S, Alliger R, Miller D, Flaum M (1995) Symptoms of schizophrenia. Methods, meanings, and mechanisms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:342–351Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andreasen NC, Olsen S (1982) Negative vs positive schizophrenia. Definition and validation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39:789–794PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bortz J (1999) Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braff DL (1989) Sensory input deficits and negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry 146:1006–1011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braff DL, Saccuzzo DP (1981) Information processing dysfunction in paranoid schizophrenia: a two-factor deficit. Am J Psychiatry 138:1051–1056PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Braff DL, Saccuzzo DP (1985) The time course of informationprocessing deficits in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 142:170–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breitmeyer BG (1984) Visual Masking: An Integrative Approach. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brickenkamp R (1994) Test d2 Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test Handanweisung. 8., erweiterte und neu gestaltete Auflage. Goettingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle: HogrefeGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Butler PD, DeSanti LA, Maddox J, Harkavy-Friedman JM, Amador XF, Goetz RR, Javitt DC, Gorman JM (2002) Visual backward-masking deficits in schizophrenia: relationship to visual pathway function and symptomatology. Schizophr Res 59:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cadenhead KS, Geyer MA, Butler RW, Perry W, Sprock J, Braff DL (1997) Information processing deficits of schizophrenia patients: relationship to clinical ratings, gender and medication status. Schizophrenia Res 28:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cadenhead KS, Serper Y, Braff DL (1998) Transient versus sustained visual channels in the visual backward masking deficits of schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry 43:132–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cuesta M, Peralta V, Gil P, Artamendi M (2003) Psychopathological dimensions in first-episode psychoses. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 253:73–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doniger GM, Silipo G, Rabinowicz EF, Snodgrass JG, Javitt DC (2001) Impaired sensory processing as a basis for object-recognition deficits in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158:1818–1826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friedman-Hill SR, Robertson LC, Treisman A (1995) Parietal Contributions to Visual Feature Binding: Evidence from a patient with Bilateral Lesions. Science 269:853–855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia-Toro M, Blanco C, Gonzalez A, Salva J (2001) Psychopathology and the binding problem. Med Hypotheses 57:718–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gray CM (1999) The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration: Still Alive and well. Neuron 24:31–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Green MF (1997) Schizophrenia from a Neurocognitive Perspective: Probing the Impenetrable Darkness. Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Green MF, Nuechterlein KH, Breitmeyer B (1997) Backward masking performance in unaffected siblings of schizophrenic patients: Evidence for a vulnerability indicator. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:465–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Green MF, Nuechterlein KH, Breitmeyer B, Mintz J (1999) Backward masking in unmedicated schizophrenic patients in psychotic remission: Possible reflection of aberrant cortical oscillation. Am J Psychiatry 156:1367–1373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Green MF, Nuechterlein KH, Mintz J (1994a) Backward masking in schizophrenia and mania, I: specifying a mechanism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:939–944Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Green MF, Nuechterlein KH, Mintz J (1994b) Backward masking in schizophrenia and mania, II: specifying the visual channels. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:945–951Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Green MF, Walker E (1986) Symptom correlates of vulnerability to backward masking in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 143:181–186Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herzog MH, Koch C (2001) Seeing properties of an invisible object: feature inheritance and shine-through. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4271–4275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herzog MH, Kopmann S, Brand A (2003) Intact figure-groundsegmentation in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res (in revision)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Herzog MH, Parish L, Koch C, Fahle M (2003) Fusion of competing features is not serial. Vision Res 43:1331–1360Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hill SK, Ragland JD, Gur RC, Gur RE (2002) Neuropsychological profiles delineate distinct profiles of schizophrenia, an interaction between memory and executive function, and uneven distributionof clinical subtypes. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 24(6):765–780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horn W (1983) Leistungspruefsystem LPS Handanweisung fuer die Durchfuehrung, Auswertung und Interpretation. 2., erweiterte und verbesserte Auflage. Goettingen, Toronto, Zuerich: HogrefeGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keri S, Antal A, Szekeres G, Benedek G, Janka Z (2000) Visual information processing in patients with schizophrenia: evidence for the impairment of central mechanisms. Neurosci Lett 293:69–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keri S, Szendi I, Kelemen O, Benedek G, Janka Z (2001) Remitted schizophrenia-spectrum patients with spared working memory show information processing abnormalities. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 251:60–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lehrl S, Merz J, Burkard G, Fischer B (1991) Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest MWT-A (Parallelform zum MWT-B). Erlangen: perimed-Fachbuch-VerlagsgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liddle PF (1987) The symptoms of chronic schizophrenia. A reexamination of the positive-negative dichotomy. Br J Psychiatry 151:145–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liddle, PF (1996) Syndromes in schizophrenia and their neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates. In: Pantelis C, Nelson HE, Barnes TRE (eds) Schizophrenia. A neuropsychological perspective. Wiley, Chichester/New York, pp 299–316Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nuechterlein KH, Dawson ME, Green MF (1994) Informationprocessing abnormalities as neuropsychological vulnerability indicators for schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 90(suppl. 384):71–79Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peralta V, Cuesta MJ, Giraldo C, Cardenas A, Gonzalez F (2002). Classifying psychotic disorders: issues regarding categorial vs. dimensional approaches and time frame to assess symptoms. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 252:12–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Phillips WA, Silverstein, SM (2003) Convergence of biological and psychological perspectives on cognitive coordination in schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26:65–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roskies AL (1999) The binding problem. Neuron 24:7–9 (and associated articles)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rund BR, Landro NI, Orbeck AL (1993) Stability in backward masking performance in schizophrenics, affectively disturbed patients, and normal subjects. J Nerv Ment Dis 181:233–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Saccuzzo DP, Cadenhead KS, Braff DL (1996) Backward versus forward visual masking deficits in schizophrenic patients: centrally, not peripherally, mediated? Am J Psychiatry 153:1564–1570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Saccuzzo DP, Hirt M, Spencer TJ (1974) Backward masking as a measure of attention in schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol 83:512–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schwartz BD, Mallott DB, Winstead DK (1988) Preattentive deficit in temporal processing by chronic schizophrenics. Biol Psychiatry 23:664–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schwartz BD, Winstead DK (1982) Visual processing deficits in acute and chronic schizophrenics. Biol Psychiatry 17:1377–1387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Singer W (1999) Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? Neuron 24:49–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Slaghuis WL, Bakker VJ (1995) Forward and backward visual masking of contour by light in positive- and negative-symptom schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol 104:41–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Slaghuis WL, Bishop AM (2001) Luminance flicker sensitivity in positive- and negative-symptom schizophrenia. Exp Brain Res 138:88–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Slaghuis WL, Curran CE (1999) Spatial frequency masking in positive- and negative-symptom schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol 108:42–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Treisman A (1998) Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society, London: B Biol Sci 29, 353(1373):1295–1306Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    von der Malsburg C (1995) Binding in models of perception and brain function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 5:520–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ward R, Danziger S, Owen V, Rafal R (2002) Deficits in spatial coding and feature binding following damage to spatiotopic maps in the human pulvinar. Nat Neurosci 5(2):99–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yates AJ (1966) Psychological deficit. Annu Rev Psychol 17:111–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Bremen, Institute for Human NeurobiologyBremenGermany
  2. 2.Klinikum Bremen OstBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations