Advertisement

Impairment of nasal mucociliary clearance time in wood industry workers

  • Gül Soylu ÖzlerEmail author
  • Ertap Akoğlu
Rhinology
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of wood dust on nasal mucociliary clearance time in wood industry workers. Moreover, the correlation between duration of exposure to wood dust and nasal mucociliary clearance time will be evaluated.

Methods

A total of 50 male subjects were included in the study. All of the subjects were non-smokers. Nasal mucociliary clearance time of 25 wood industry workers was measured with saccharine method and compared with the results of 25 age-matched control group. Also, the correlation between nasal mucociliary clearance time and duration of exposure to wood dust in woodworkers was evaluated.

Results

The mean mucociliary clearance time in control group and wood industry workers was 12.28 ± 1.98 and 16.72 ± 2.71, respectively. The mean mucociliary clearance time in wood industry workers was significantly longer than control group (p < 0.0001). Also,there was positive correlation between duration of exposure to wood dust and nasal mucociliary clearance time in wood industry workers (r = 0.879, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The clinicians must remember that mucociliary clearance time in wood industry workers is prolonged. So the wood industry workers must be followed up more closely for sinonasal infections and respiratory tract diseases.

Keywords

Wood industry workers Nasal mucociliary clearance time Wood dust Sinonasal infection Nasal cancer 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (include name of committee + reference number) and in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Jacobsen G, Schlunssen V, Schaumburg I, Taudorf E, Sigsgaard T (2008) Longitudinal lung function decline and wood dust exposure in the furniture industry. Eur Respir J 31:334–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greiser EM, Greiser KH, Ahrens W, Hagen R, Lazszig R, Maier H et al (2012) Risk factors for nasal malignancies in German men: the South-German Nasal cancer study. BMC Cancer 12:506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siew SS, Kauppinen T, Kyyrönen P, Heikkilä P, Pukkala E (2012) Occupational exposure to wood dust and formaldehyde and risk of nasal, nasopharyngeal, and lung cancer among Finnish men. Cancer Manag Res 4:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franchi A, Miligi L, Palomba A, Giovannetti L, Santucci M (2011) Sinonasal carcinomas: recent advances in molecular and phenotypic characterization and their clinical implications. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 79(3):265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Young C, Cherrie J, Van Tongeren M, Fortunato L, Hutchings S, Rushton L (2012) Sinonasal cancer. In: The burden of occupational cancer in Great Britain. RR933 Research Report for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Merton Road, Bootle, Merseyside L20 7HS (UK): HSE Books, p. 1–59Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonneterre V, Deschamps E, Persoons R, Bernardet C, Liaudy S, Maitre A et al (2007) Sino-nasal cancer and exposure to leather dust. Occup Med (Lond) 57(6):438–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mastrangelo G, Fedeli U, Fadda E, Milan G, Lange JH (2002) Epidemiologic evidence of cancer risk in textile industry workers: a review and update. Toxicol Ind Health 18(4):171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coggon D, Harris EC, Poole J, Palmer KT (2003) Extended follow-up of a cohort of british chemical workers exposed to formaldehyde. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(21):1608–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soylu Özler G, Akbay E, Akkoca AN, Karapınar OS, Şimşek GÖ (2015) Does menopause effect nasal mucociliary clearance time? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(2):363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deitmer T (1989) Physiology and pathology of the mucociliary system. Special regards to mucociliary transport in malignant lesions of the human larynx. Arc Otorhinolaryngol 43:1–136Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asai K, Haruna S, Otori N, Yanagi K, Fukami M, Moriyama H (2000) Saccharin test of maxillary sinus mucociliary function after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 110:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun SS, Hsieh JF, Tsai SC, Ho YJ, Kao CH (2000) The role of rhinoscintigraphy in the evaluation of nasal mucociliary clearance function in patients with sinusitis. Nucl Med Commun 21:1029–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Binazzi A, Ferrante P, Marinaccio A (2015) Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 15:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gallet P, Nguyen DT, Russel A, Jankowski R, Vigouroux C, Rumeau C (2018) Intestinal and non-intestinal nasal cavity adenocarcinoma: impact of wood dust exposure. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 135(6):383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyHatay Mustafa Kemal UniversityHatayTurkey

Personalised recommendations