Advertisement

Exploring stimulation patterns for electrical stimulation of the larynx using surface electrodes

  • Marlies FeinerEmail author
  • C. Gerstenberger
  • W. Mayr
  • D. Hortobagyi
  • M. Gugatschka
Laryngology

Abstract

Purpose

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is considered an upcoming treatment modality for a number of laryngeal diseases. However, sound data are scarce when it comes to surface FES to treat voice disorders. Aim of the present study was to identify and differentiate suitable surface FES patterns to activate internal laryngeal muscles.

Methods

Non-invasive FES was performed in a cohort of 17 elderly woman. Our user-customized electrical stimulation setup allowed us to deliver ten different stimulation patterns (rectangular and sawtooth shaped) with variation of frequency and amplitude. Stimulation outcome, i.e., vocal fold (VF) reaction, was continuously verified by transnasal endoscopy.

Results

Responses to FES using ten different stimulation patterns varied inter-individually. None of the stimulation parameter sets could elicit a VF reaction in all participants.

Conclusion

Based on our findings we conclude that individual fitting is necessary when defining surface stimulation parameters. To overcome limitations of previous studies, devices with freely programmable patterns are required as shown here. Endoscopic control of VF reaction is absolutely essential to ensure effectiveness of the delivered patterns.

Keywords

Laryngeal functional electrical stimulation Transcutaneous electrical stimulation Voice rehabilitation Presbyphonia Dysphonia 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft), fund no. 848458.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethics committee of the Medical University of Graz and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

References

  1. 1.
    Böhme G (1965) Die Effektivität der Elektrotherapie bei laryngealen Erkrankungen im strobsokopischen Bild. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol 44:481–488Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garcia Perez A, Hernández López X, Valadez Jiménez VM et al (2014) Synchronous electrical stimulation of laryngeal muscles: an alternative for enhancing recovery of unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. J Voice 28:524.e1–524.e7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zealear DL, Dedo HH (1977) Control of paralyzed axial muscles by electrical stimulation. Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 84:310Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ptok M, Strack D (2008) Electrical stimulation-supported voice exercises are superior to voice exercise therapy alone in patients with unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis: results from a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Muscle Nerve 38:1005–1011.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.21063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ptok M, Strack D (2005) Voice exercise therapy versus electrostimulation therapy in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. HNO 53:1092–1097.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-004-1216-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ptok M, Strack D (2009) Therapeutic effects of electrical stimulation therapy on vocal fold vibration irregularity. HNO 57:1157–1162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-008-1828-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gorham-Rowan M, Morris R (2016) Exploring the effect of laryngeal neuromuscular electrical stimulation on voice. J Laryngol Otol 130:1022–1032.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116009038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fowler LP, Gorham-Rowan M, Hapner ER (2011) An exploratory study of voice change associated with healthy speakers after transcutaneous electrical stimulation to laryngeal muscles. J Voice 25:54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ludlow CL, Humbert I, Saxon K et al (2007) Effects of surface electrical stimulation both at rest and during swallowing in chronic pharyngeal Dysphagia. Dysphagia 22:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9029-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carnaby-Mann GD, Crary MA (2007) Examining the evidence on neuromuscular electrical stimulation for swallowing: a meta-analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:564–571.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.133.6.564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Humbert IA, Poletto CJ, Saxon KG et al (2006) The effect of surface electrical stimulation on hyolaryngeal movement in normal individuals at rest and during swallowing. J Appl Physiol 101:1657–1663.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00348.2006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller S, Jungheim M, Kühn D, Ptok M (2013) Electrical stimulation in treatment of pharyngolaryngeal dysfunctions. Folia Phoniatr Logop 65:154–168.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000355562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pitman MJ (2014) Treatment of spasmodic dysphonia with a neuromodulating electrical implant. Laryngoscope 124:2537–2543.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mueller AH, Hagen R, Foerster G et al (2016) Laryngeal pacing via an implantable stimulator for the rehabilitation of subjects suffering from bilateral vocal fold paralysis: a prospective first-in-human study. Laryngoscope 126:1810–1816.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karbiener M, Jarvis JC, Perkins JD et al (2016) Reversing age related changes of the laryngeal muscles by chronic electrostimulation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. PLoS ONE 11:e0167367.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin-Oviedo C, Maranillo E, Lowy-Benoliel A et al (2011) Functional role of human laryngeal nerve connections. Laryngoscope 121:2338–2343.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.22340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Humbert IA, Poletto CJ, Saxon KG et al (2008) The effect of surface electrical stimulation on vocal fold position. Laryngoscope 118:14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e318155a47d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lagorio LA, Carnaby-Mann GD, Crary MA (2010) Treatment of vocal fold bowing using neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:398–403.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Law T, Lee KY-S, Wong RWM et al (2017) Effects of electrical stimulation on vocal functions in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope 127:1119–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seifpanahi S, Izadi F, Jamshidi A-A, Shirmohammadi N (2017) Effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on vocal folds adduction. Eur Arch Oto-rhino-laryngol 274:3423–3428.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4619-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ludlow CL (2010) Electrical neuromuscular stimulation in dysphagia: current status. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 18:159–164.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283395dec CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seifpanahi S, Izadi F, Jamshidi A-A et al (2016) Role of the internal superior laryngeal nerve in the motor responses of vocal cords and the related voice acoustic changes. Iran J Med Sci 41:374–381Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Takeda N, Thomas GR, Ludlow CL (2000) Aging effects on motor units in the human thyroarytenoid muscle. Laryngoscope 110:1018–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200006000-00025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of PhoniatricsMedical University GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringMedical University of ViennaGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations