Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of needle aspiration versus incision and drainage under local anaesthesia for the initial treatment of peritonsillar abscess

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 25 September 2019

Abstract

Purpose

The treatment of peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is still controversial regarding the best method of drainage to perform. This study aims to compare effectiveness and safety of needle aspiration versus incision and drainage under local anaesthesia for the initial treatment of PTA.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients (age > 15 years) admitted in two tertiary medical centres for a PTA between November 2010 and October 2016 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of drainage: needle aspiration or incision and drainage, under local anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay; the need to repeat the procedure or to go to the operating room was also assessed. Complications or adverse events were listed in each group to assess safety.

Results

Over a 6-year period, 182 patients were admitted for a PTA and included in the analysis, with 82 patients in the aspiration group and 100 patients in the incision group. Mean age was 36.3 years, with a sex ratio of 1.33. The length of hospital stay ranged from 1 to 7 days (mean 2.7 days, median 2 days) with a median length of stay of 3.0 days (interquartile range 2–4) in the aspiration group versus 2.0 days (IQR 2–3) in patients who underwent incision and drainage (p = 0.009). A repetition of the needle aspiration was made for 46.3% of patients versus 10% of repetition of the procedure in the incision group (p = 0.0001). 12 patients (14%) of the aspiration group and 4 patients (4%) of the incision group required an additional drainage under general anaesthesia (p < 0.001). We found no differences regarding safety in both groups.

Conclusion

Our study showed a significant decrease in the length of hospital stay in patients admitted for a PTA who underwent an initial incision and drainage under local anaesthesia, compared to needle aspiration, as well as a lower risk of repeating the procedure. A well-designed prospective and randomized study on a larger sample of patients is required to support these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson RF, Stewart MG, Wright CC (2003) An evidence-based review of the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(3):332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Couloigner V, Graber M (2014) L’angineetses complications. EMC-ORL Fév 9(1):5–7

    Google Scholar 

  3. SFORL (2014) Recommandations pour la Pratique Clinique. Complications loco-régionales des pharyngitis

  4. Powell JWJA (2012) An evidence-based review of peritonsillar abscess. Clin Otolarygol 37:136–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spires J, Owens J, Woodson G et al (1987) Treatment of peritonsillar abscess: a prospective study of aspiration vs Incision and drainage. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:984–986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maharaj D, Rajah V, Hemsley S (1991) Management of peritonsillar abscess. J Laryngol Otol 105:743–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stringer SP, Schaefer SD, Close LG (1988) A randomized trial for outpatient management of peritonsillar abscess. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114:296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Demeslay J, De Bonnecaze G, Vairel B et al (2014) Possible role of anti-inflammatory drugs in complications of pharyngitis A retrospective analysis of 163 cases. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 131(5):299–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lepelletier D, Pinaud V, Le Conte P et al (2016) Is there an association between prior anti-inflammatory drug exposure and occurrence of peritonsillar abscess (PTA)? A national multicenter prospective observational case–control study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36(1):57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feasson T, Debeaupte M, Bidet C et al (2016) Impact of anti-inflammatory drug consumption in peritonsillar abscesses: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 16(1):432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolf M, Even-Chen I, Kronenberg J (1994) Peritonsillar Abscess: Repeated needle aspiration versus Incision and drainage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:554–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Souza DL, Cabrera D, Gilani WI et al (2016) Comparison of medical versus surgical management of peritonsillar abscess: A retrospective observational study. Laryngoscope 126(7):1529–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehanna HM, White A (2002) National audit of the management of peritonsillar abscess. Postgrad Med J 78:545–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schechter GL, Sly DE, Roper AL et al (1982) Changing face of treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Laryngoscope 92:654–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang BA, Thamboo A, Burton MJ et al (2016) Needle aspiration** versus incision and drainage for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:006287

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herzon F (1995) Peritonsillar abscess: incidence, current management practices, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Laryngoscope 105(74):1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chi TH, Yuan CH, Tsao YH (2014) Comparison of needle aspiration with incision and drainage for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. WIMJ Open 1(1):11–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khan MI, Iqbal K, Marwat M (2012) Peritonsillar abscess: comparison of outcome of incision and drainage versus needle aspiration. Gomal J Med Sci 10(2):205–208

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nwe TTSB (2000) Management of pain in peritonsillar abscess. J Laryngol Otol 114:765–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service d’ORL et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, CHU de toulouse, hôpital Larrey, 24, chemin de Pouvourville, TSA 30030, 31059, Toulouse cedex 9, France

    C. Mansour, G. De Bonnecaze, E. Mouchon, S. Vergez & E. Serrano

  2. Service d’épidémiologie, CHU de Toulouse, 31000, Toulouse, France

    A. Gallini

  3. UMR 1027 Inserm, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse 3, 31000, Toulouse, France

    A. Gallini

  4. Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Oncopole-1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse Cedex 9, France

    S. Vergez

Authors
  1. C. Mansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. De Bonnecaze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Mouchon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Gallini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Vergez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. Serrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Mansour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and received no funding concerning this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study with retrospective design, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansour, C., De Bonnecaze, G., Mouchon, E. et al. Comparison of needle aspiration versus incision and drainage under local anaesthesia for the initial treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 2595–2601 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05542-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05542-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation