Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of salvage surgery for the oropharynx and larynx: a contemporary experience in a UK Cancer Centre

  • Head & Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to review our recent experience of salvage surgery, comparing larynx and oropharynx recurrence patterns.

Methods

A single centre, retrospective review of salvage surgery for recurrent head and neck cancer including patients between 2008 and 2016.

Results

61 patients were identified, 36 underwent salvage laryngectomy and 25 received oropharyngeal resections. The median overall survival of oropharyngeal recurrent tumors was 26 months (95% CI 15–118 months) and for laryngeal tumors was 23 months (95% CI 11–38 months), p = 0.1008. There was a significant overall survival benefit in patients with negative resection margin. The median survival in the negative margin group was 38 months (95% CI 25–108 months) compared to the positive margin group, 9 months (95% CI 5–15 months), p < 0.0001.

Conclusion

Survival results following surgical salvage in the larynx and oropharynx appear to be similarly poor. Those patients with clear margins appear to have a significantly better prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen AY, Fedewa S, Zhu J (2011) Temporal trends in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage laryngeal cancer in the United States, 1985–2007. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(10):1017–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maddox PT, Davies L (2012) Trends in total laryngectomy in the era of organ preservation: a population-based study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(1):85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen AY, Schrag N, Hao Y, Stewart A, Ward E (2007) Changes in treatment of advanced oropharyngeal cancer, 1985–2001. Laryngoscope 117(1):16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen AY, Zhu J, Fedewa S (2014) Temporal trends in oropharyngeal cancer treatment and survival: 1998–2009. Laryngoscope 124(1):131–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lyhne NM, Johansen J, Kristensen CA, Andersen E, Primdahl H, Andersen LJ et al (2016) Pattern of failure in 5001 patients treated for glottic squamous cell carcinoma with curative intent—a population based study from the DAHANCA group. Radiother Oncol 118(2):257–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bird T, De Felice F, Michaelidou A, Thavaraj S, Jeannon JP, Lyons A et al (2017) Outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy as primary treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma—a European singleinstitution analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 42(1):115–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zafereo ME, Hanasono MM, Rosenthal DI, Sturgis EM, Lewin JS, Roberts DB et al (2009) The role of salvage surgery in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Cancer 115(24):5723–5733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho AS, Kraus DH, Ganly I, Lee NY, Shah JP, Morris LG (2014) Decision making in the management of recurrent head and neck cancer. Head Neck 36(1):144–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodwin WJ (2000) Jr. Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends justify the means? Laryngoscope 110(3 Pt 2 Suppl 93):1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kowalski LP, Carvalho AL (2000) Natural history of untreated head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer 36(8):1032–1037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganly I, Patel S, Matsuo J, Singh B, Kraus D, Boyle J et al (2005) Postoperative complications of salvage total laryngectomy. Cancer 103(10):2073–2081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoeckli SJ, Pawlik AB, Lipp M, Huber A, Schmid S (2000) Salvage surgery after failure of nonsurgical therapy for carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(12):1473–1477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McLaughlin MP, Parsons JT, Fein DA, Stringer SP, Cassisi NJ, Mendenhall WM et al (1996) Salvage surgery after radiotherapy failure in T1-T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx. Head Neck 18(3):229–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kano S, Homma A, Hayashi R, Kawabata K, Yoshino K, Iwae S et al (2013) Salvage surgery for recurrent oropharyngeal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 18(5):817–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tan PF et al (2010) Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 363(1):24–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E et al (2011) Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol 29(32):4294–4301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Paleri V, Roland N (2016) Introduction to the United Kingdom national multidisciplinary guidelines for head and neck cancer. J Laryngol Otol 130(S2):S3–S4

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. American Joint Committee on C, Edge SB, American Joint Committee on C (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th edn, vol xiv. Springer, New York, p 648 ill., port. ; 28 cm. + 1 CD-ROM (4 3/4 in.) p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo T, Qualliotine JR, Ha PK, Califano JA, Kim Y, Saunders JR et al (2015) Surgical salvage improves overall survival for patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative recurrent locoregional and distant metastatic oropharyngeal cancer. Cancer 121(12):1977–1984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eckardt A, Barth EL, Kokemueller H, Wegener G (2004) Recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck: treatment strategies and survival analysis in a 20-year period. Oral Oncol 40(4):427–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frakes JM, Strom T (2016) Detection of recurrence in HPV associated oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma. In: Presented at: 2016 multidisciplinary head and neck cancer symposium; February 18–20, 2016; Scottsdale, AZ. Abstract 62016

  22. Yao M, Smith RB, Hoffman HT, Funk GF, Lu M, Menda Y et al (2009) Clinical significance of postradiotherapy [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in management of head-and-neck cancer-a long-term outcome report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(1):9–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bird T, Barrington S, Thavaraj S, Jeannon JP, Lyons A, Oakley R et al (2016) (18)F-FDG PET/CT to assess response and guide risk-stratified follow-up after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43(7):1239–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bachar GY, Goh C, Goldstein DP, O’Sullivan B, Irish JC (2010) Long-term outcome analysis after surgical salvage for recurrent tonsil carcinoma following radical radiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(2):295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nichols AC, Kneuertz PJ, Deschler DG, Lin DT, Emerick KS, Clark JR et al (2011) Surgical salvage of the oropharynx after failure of organ-sparing therapy. Head Neck 33(4):516–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel SN, Cohen MA, Givi B, Dixon BJ, Gilbert RW, Gullane PJ et al (2016) Salvage surgery for locally recurrent oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E658–E664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamoir M, Holvoet E, Ambroise J, Lengele B, Schmitz S (2017) Salvage surgery in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Oncologic outcome and predictors of disease free survival. Oral Oncol 67:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley Hay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hay, A., Simo, R., Hall, G. et al. Outcomes of salvage surgery for the oropharynx and larynx: a contemporary experience in a UK Cancer Centre. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 1153–1159 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05295-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05295-x

Keywords

Navigation