Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 276, Issue 1, pp 185–191 | Cite as

Predictive factors for complications associated with penetrated fish bones outside the upper gastrointestinal tract

  • Qingguo Chen
  • Hanqi Chu
  • Ting Tong
  • Yanling Tao
  • Liangqiang Zhou
  • Jin Chen
  • Yun Liu
  • Liyan PengEmail author
Laryngology

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate predictive risk factors for complications associated with migrating fish bones in the surrounding tissue of upper gastrointestinal tract.

Methods

A retrospective analysis over 12 years was conducted of 45 cases of buried fish bones in the surrounding tissue of upper gastrointestinal tract with complications. Meanwhile, a control group, including 39 cases of prolonged buried fish bones in the surrounding tissue of upper gastrointestinal tract without complications, was set. Patient clinical data were collected and analyzed to predict the risk factors for complications.

Results

The results of Chi-square test and univariate analysis both showed a significant difference in length of fish bone (> 2 cm), a history of concurrent medical illness (diabetes mellitus and renal hypofunction), symptoms (medium or heavy pain and dysphagia), and duration of significant symptoms (> 7 days) between the complication group and non-complication group. Multivariate analysis further identified length (> 2 cm), diabetes mellitus, medium or heavy pain, dysphagia, and duration of significant symptoms (> 7 days) as independent risk factors for complications.

Conclusions

The consequences of fish bones migrating outside the upper gastrointestinal tract are various in different people. Awareness should be raised when encountering a patient ingesting a long fish bone, having a history of diabetes mellitus, presenting with significant discomforts, or these discomforts lasting for a long time. This study will help practitioners counsel their patients on the risks and `benefits of surgery versus observation of this condition.

Keywords

Fish bone Penetration Upper gastrointestinal tract Risk factor Complication 

Notes

Funding

This study is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers: 81300827 and 81500791).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim HU (2016) Oroesophageal fish bone foreign Body. Clin Endosc 49:318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen HH, Ruan LX, Zhou SH, Wang SQ (2014) The utility of repeated computed tomography to track a foreign body penetrating the esophagus to the level of the thyroid gland. Oral Radiol 30:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilish DP, Rajan GP, Farooque F (2008) Fish bone migration through the cervical spine. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:407–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sinha R, Jana U, Ghatak S, Biswas G, Saha J, Sen I (2015) Use of fluoroscopic guidance to remove a migrating esophageal foreign body. Ear Nose Throat J 94:E30–E33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pang KP, Tan NG, Chia KH, Tan HM, Tseng GY (2005) Migrating foreign body into the common carotid artery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:667–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joshi AA, Bradoo RA (2003) A foreign body in the pharynx migrating through the internal jugular vein. Am J Otolaryngol 24:89–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez PH, Häfner M, Hartmann D, Hassan C, Hucl T, Lesur G, Aabakken L, Meining A (2016) Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Clin Guideline Endoscopy 48:489–496Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kwon OJ, Park JJ, Kim JP, Woo SH (2013) Vocal cord paralysis caused by stingray. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:3191–3194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chee LW, Sethi DS (1999) Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to migrating foreign bodies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coret A, Heyman Z, Bendet E, Amitai M, Itzchak I, Kronberg J (1993) Thyroid abscess resulting from transesophageal migration of a fish bone: ultrasound appearance. J Clin Ultrasound 21:152–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goh YH, Tan NG (1999) Penetrating oesophageal foreign bodies in the thyroid gland. J Laryngol Otol 113:769–771Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Watanabe K, Amano M, Nakanome A, Saito D, Hashimoto S (2012) The prolonged presence of a fish bone in the neck. Tohoku J Exp Med 227:49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar S, Yu C, Toppi J, Ng M, Hill F, Sist N (2018) The utility of diagnostic imaging in fish bone impaction. Open J Radiol 8:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Devarajan K, Voigt S, Shroff S, Weiner SG, Wein RO (2015) Diagnosing fish bone and chicken bone impactions in the emergency department setting: measuring the system utility of the plain film screen. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 124:614–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jahshan F, Sela E, Layous E, Levy E, Assadi N, Shilo E, Ibrahim N, Maayan D, Ronen O (2018) Clinical criteria for CT scan evaluation of upper digestive tract fishbone. Laryngoscope 128:2467–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu E, Huang L, Zhou Y, Zhu X (2018) Migratory fish bone in the thyroid gland: case report and literature review. Case Rep Med 2018:7345723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johari HH, Khaw BL, Yusof Z, Mohamad I (2016) Migrating fish bone piercing the common carotid artery, thyroid gland and causing deep neck abscess. World J Clin Cases 4:375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chung SM, Kim HS, Park EH (2008) Migrating pharyngeal foreign bodies: a series of four cases of saw-toothed fish bones. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265:1125–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical CollegeHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryTaikang Tongji (Wuhan) HospitalWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations