Greater palatine canal injections reduce operative bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 90 Downloads
The use of greater palatine canal (GPC) injections of a local anesthetic and a vasoconstrictor to decrease surgical bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is controversial. We investigated the role of a preoperative GPC injection to minimize intraoperative bleeding during ESS in patients with chronic sinusitis through a meta-analysis of the relevant literature.
PubMed, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane database.
We screened the relevant literature published before May of 2018. Five articles that compared the pre-operative GPC injection (treatment group) with a placebo or no treatment (control group) were included for this analysis of the outcomes, which included an endoscopic grade of nasal bleeding and intraoperative hemodynamic stability during ESS.
The endoscopic grade in the treatment group was significantly reduced when compared with the control group. No significant adverse effects were reported in the enrolled studies. The subgroup analyses of these results compared the concentrations of adrenalin (1:80,000 or 1:100,000), and adrenalin 1:80,000 showed significant effects on intraoperative bleeding when compared to adrenalin 1:100,000.
This study demonstrated that GPC injections of local anesthesia with 1:80,000 adrenaline for ESS effectively reduced intraoperative bleeding. Additionally, this procedure showed no significant adverse effects, such as hemodynamic instability. However, the standardized dosing needs further investigation and more trials.
Level of evidence
KeywordsAdrenalin Endoscopic sinus surgery Bleeding Adverse effect Meta-analysis
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1B07045421).
No funding and financial relationships to disclose.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
- 6.Shenoy VS, Prakash N, Kamath PM, Rao RA, Deviprasad D, Prasad V, Kamboj V, Borra LK (2017) Is pterygopalatine fossa injection with adrenaline an effective technique for better surgical field in fess? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69:464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1225-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Atighechi S, Azimi MR, Mirvakili SA, Baradaranfar MH, Dadgarnia MH (2013) Evaluation of intraoperative bleeding during an endoscopic surgery of nasal polyposis after a pre-operative single dose versus a 5-day course of corticosteroid. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2451–2454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2340-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Douglas R, Wormald PJ (2006) Pterygopalatine fossa infiltration through the greater palatine foramen: where to bend the needle. Laryngoscope 116:1255–1257. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000226005.43817.a2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Faraone SV (2008) Interpreting estimates of treatment effects: implications for managed care. Pharm Ther 33:700–711Google Scholar
- 17.Managutti A, Prakasam M, Puthanakar N, Menat S, Shah D, Patel H (2015) Comparative analysis of local anesthesia with 2 different concentrations of adrenaline: a randomized and single blind study. J Int Oral Health 7:24–27Google Scholar
- 18.Shoroghi M, Sadrolsadat SH, Razzaghi M, Farahbakhsh F, Sheikhvatan M, Sheikhfathollahi M, Abbasi A (2008) Effect of different epinephrine concentrations on local bleeding and hemodynamics during dermatologic surgery. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 16:209–214Google Scholar
- 21.Song JJ, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Salcido R (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of honey to protect from the effects of radiation-induced oral mucositis. Adv Skin Wound Care 25:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000410687.14363.a3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar