Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 11, pp 2683–2693 | Cite as

Asymmetric hearing loss and the benefit of cochlear implantation regarding speech perception, tinnitus burden and psychological comorbidities: a prospective follow-up study

  • Manuel Christoph KettererEmail author
  • Steffen Knopke
  • Sophia Marie Häußler
  • Tanja Hildenbrand
  • Christoph Becker
  • Stefan Gräbel
  • Heidi Olze
Otology

Abstract

Objectives

We determined the audiological outcome, the subjective and objective hearing quality in patients suffering from asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Furthermore, we evaluated psychological comorbidities and tinnitus burden before and after cochlear implantation.

Study design

Prospective cohort study.

Methods

44 AHL patients were unilaterally implanted with a multichannel cochlear implant between 2011 and 2016. Speech discrimination (Freiburg Monosyllable Word Test, Oldenburg Sentence Test) was measured before, 6 and 12 months after implantation. Subjective hearing quality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), tinnitus burden, anxiety, depressiveness, perceived stress level and coping abilities were evaluated before implantation, 6 and 12 months postoperative using specific validated questionnaires (Oldenburg Inventory, Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire, Tinnitus Questionnaire, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Questionnaire and Cope Inventory).

Results

Subjective and objective hearing quality, speech discrimination and health-related quality of life were significantly increased in AHL patients. Tinnitus burden significantly decreased over the 12 postoperative months. No significant alteration was observed for anxiety, depressiveness, coping abilities and stress level.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that cochlear implantation achieves hearing rehabilitation, increases HRQoL and decreases tinnitus burden in patients suffering from AHL. Subjective hearing quality increased, while tinnitus burden significantly decreased 6 and 12 months after implantation. HRQoL in AHL patients is an important factor to focus on and is significantly increased postoperatively. In contrast, general anxiety, depressiveness, coping abilities and perceived stress level remained unaffected.

Keywords

Asymmetric hearing loss Cochlear implantation Health-related quality of life Audiological outcome Tinnitus burden 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no funding, financial relationships or conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersson G, Freijd A, Baguley DM, Idrizbegovic E (2009) Tinnitus distress, anxiety, depression, and hearing problems among cochlear implant patients with tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol 20(5):315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arndt S, Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Hassepass F, Beck R, Wesarg T (2017) Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss. HNO. 10Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):75S–79SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borton SA, Mauze E, Lieu JE (2010) Quality of life in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study. Am J Audiol 19(1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyd PJ (2015) Potential benefits from cochlear implantation of children with unilateral hearing loss. Cochlear Implants Int 16(3):121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brüggemann P, Szczepek AJ, Klee K, Gräbel S, Mazurek B, Olze H (2017) In Patients undergoing cochlear implantation, psychological burden affects tinnitus and the overall outcome of auditory rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci 5(11):226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 56(2):267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Damen GW, Beynon AJ, Krabbe PF, Mulder JJ, Mylanus EA (2007) Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(4):597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fellinger J, Holzinger D, Gerich J, Goldberg D (2007) Mental distress and quality of life in the hard of hearing. Acta Psychiatr Scand 115(3):243–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fliege H, Rose M, Arck P, Walter OB, Kocalevent RD, Weber C, Klapp BF (2005) The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples. Psychosom Med 67(1):78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK (2002) Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 112(8 Pt 1):1482–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goebel G, Hiller W (1994) The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire. HNO 42(3):166–172 (German) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hahlbrock KH (1953) Speech audiometry and new word-tests. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd 162(5):394–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hiller W, Goebel G, Rief W (1994) Reliability of self-rated tinnitus distress and association with psychological symptom patterns. Br J Clin Psychol 33(Pt 2):231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):756–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H (2008) The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008 138(3):357–362Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 306(6890):1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ketterer MC, Aschendorff A, Arndt S, Hassepass F, Wesarg T, Laszig R, Beck R (2018) The influence of cochlearmorphology on the final electrode array position. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(2):385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Knoll N, Rieckmann N, Schwarzer R (2005) Coping as a mediator between personality and stress outcomes: a longitudinal study with cataract surgery patients. Eur J Pers 19:229–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knopke S, Szczepek AJ, Häussler SM, Gräbel S, Olze H (2017) Cochlear implantation of bilaterally deafened patients with tinnitus induces sustained decrease of tinnitus-related distress. Front Neurol 25(8):158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knopke S, Gräbel S, Förster-Ruhrmann U, Mazurek B, Szczepek AJ, Olze H (2016) Impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and mental comorbidity in patients aged 80 years. Laryngoscope 126(12):2811–2816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kollmeier B, Holube I (1991) Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung des subjektiven Hörvermögens; Erstellung der Fragen und Beziehungen zum Tonschwellenaudiogramm. Audiologische Diagnostik 30:48–64Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levenstein S, Prantera C, Varvo V, Scribano ML, Berto E, Luzi C, Andreoli A. Development of the perceived stress questionnaire: a new tool for psychosomatic research. J Psychosom Res 37(1):19–32Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, Xue QL, Harris TB, Purchase-Helzner E, Satterfield S, Ayonayon HN, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM (2013) Health ABC Study Group. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 173(4):293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lin FR (2011) Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66(10):1131–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Louza J, Hempel JM, Krause E, Berghaus A, Müller J, Braun T (2017) Patient benefit from Cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(6):2405–2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, Brähler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, Herzberg PY. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care 46(3):266–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miyamoto RT, Bichey BG (2003) Cochlear implantation for tinnitus suppression. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 36(2):345–352 (Review) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mo B, Harris S, Lindbaek M (2002) Tinnitus in cochlear implant patients—a comparison with other hearing-impaired patients. Int J Audiol 41(8):527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mohiyeddini C, Hautzinger M, Bauer S (2002) A latent state-trait analysis on assessing trait and state components of three instruments for measuring depression: ADS, BDI, and SDS. Diagnostica 48(1):12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Olze H, Gräbel S, Förster U, Zirke N, Huhnd LE, Haupt H, Mazurek B (2012) Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope 122(1):196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Olze H, Gräbel S, Haupt H, Förster U, Mazurek B (2012) Extra benefit of a second cochlear implant with respect to health-related quality of life and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 33(7):1169–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Olze H, Szczepek AJ, Haupt H, Zirke N, Graebel S, Mazurek B (2012) The impact of cochlear implantation on tinnitus, stress and quality of life in postlingually deafened patients. Audiol Neurootol 17(1):2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Olze H, Knopke S, Gräbel S, Szczepek AJ (2016) Rapid positive influence of cochlear implantation on the quality of life in adults 70 years and older. Audiol Neurootol 21(Suppl 1):43–47 (Epub 2016 Nov 3) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Olze H, Szczepek AJ, Haupt H, Förster U, Zirke N, Gräbel S, Mazurek B (2011) Cochlear implantation has a positive influence on quality of life, tinnitus, and psychological comorbidity. Laryngoscope 121(10):2220–2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peracino A (2014) Hearing loss and dementia in the aging population. Audiol Neurootol 19(Suppl 1):6–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Piehlmeier W, Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Land W, Landgraf R (1996) Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus before and after organ transplantation with the SF 36 health survey. Eur J Surg 162(12):933–940PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ramos-Macías Á, Falcón González JC, Borkoski-Barreiro SA, Ramos de Miguel Á, Batista DS, Pérez Plasencia D (2016) Health-related quality of life in adult cochlear implant users: a descriptive observational study. Audiol Neurootol 21(Suppl 1):36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rösli M, Hoth S, Baumann I, Praetorius M, Plinkert PK (2015) The impact of cochlear implants on the quality of life of patients with single-sided deafness. HNO 63(3):182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seydel C, Haupt H, Szczepek AJ, Klapp BF, Mazurek B (2010) Long-term improvement in tinnitus after modified tinnitus retraining therapy enhanced by a variety of psychological approaches. Audiol Neurootol 15(2):69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D (2008) Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(9):645–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Van Loon MC, Smits C, Smit CF, Hensen EF, Merkus P (2017) Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss: benefits of bimodal stimulation. Otol Neurotol 38(6):e100–e106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P (2009) Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 14(3):163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vincent C, Arndt S, Firszt JB, Fraysse B, Kitterick PT, Papsin BC, Snik A, Van de Heyning P, Deguine O, Marx M (2015) Identification and evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with asymmetrical hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 20(Suppl 1):87–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wie OB, Pripp AH, Tvete O (2010) Unilateral deafness in adults: effects on communication and social interaction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119(11):772–781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zirke N, Seydel C, Szczepek AJ, Olze H, Haupt H, Mazurek B (2013) Psychological comorbidity in patients with chronic tinnitus: analysis and comparison with chronic pain, asthma or atopic dermatitis patients. Qual Life Res 22(2):263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zöger S, Svedlund J, Holgers KM (2001) Psychiatric disorders in tinnitus patients without severe hearing impairment: 24 month follow-up of patients at an audiological clinic. Audiology 40(3):133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyCharité-Universitätsmedizin, BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations