Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 9, pp 2403–2406 | Cite as

Effect of the temperature of nasal lavages on mucociliary clearance: a randomised controlled trial

  • Marcel Sauvalle
  • Andrés Alvo
Short Communication
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The respiratory epithelium is mainly constituted by caliciform (produces mucus, responsible of keeping moisture and trapping particles) and ciliated cells (transports mucus into the pharynx, by the movement of multiple cilia). For centuries, nasal lavages have been used for different rhinosinusal conditions. Some studies suggest not only a direct effect on the mobilisation of secretions, but also an improvement in mucociliary clearance rates. To our knowledge, the impact of temperature in nasal lavages has been scarcely studied.

Methodology/principal

We used the saccharin test—applying it in the inferior turbinate and timing the detection of its taste—, to estimate mucociliary clearance rates before and after nasal lavages with saline solution at room (20 °C) or body (37 °C) temperatures.

Results

78 healthy subjects were studied, with a mean saccharin test time of 13.88 min. Then, a nasal lavage was performed, half with 20 °C saline and the other with 37 °C. In both, times improved from baseline (from 13.66 to 11.59 and 14.06 to 9.4 min, respectively) with p values < 0.05.

Conclusions

Nasal lavages with saline solution improve mucociliary clearance as measured by saccharin test. Temperature seems to matter, which should be taken into account when indicating nasal lavages to our patients.

Keywords

Nasal lavage Mucociliary clearance Nasal mucosa Rhinosinusitis Rhinitis 

Notes

Funding

None.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval (research in humans)

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Fahy JV, Dickey BF (2010) Airway mucus function and dysfunction. N Engl J Med 363:2233–2247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pérez F, Méndez A, Lagos A, Vargas SL (2014) Mucociliary clearance system in lung defense. Rev Med Chile 142:606–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Houtmeyers E, Gosselink R, Gayan-Ramírez G, Decrameer M (1999) Regulation of mucociliary clearance in health and disease. Eur Respir J 13(5):1177–1188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Plaza Valía P, Carrión Valero F, Marín Pardo J, Bautista Rentero D, Monte GC (2008) Saccharin test for the study of mucociliary clearance: reference values for a Spanish population]. Arch Bronconeumol 44:540–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andersen IB, Camner P, Jensen PI, Philipson K, Proctor DF (1974) A comparison of nasal and tracheobronchial clearance. Arch Environ Health 29:290–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F et al (2012) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. Rhinol Suppl 23(3):1–298Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khianey R, Oppenheimer J (2012) Is nasal saline irrigation all it is cracked up to be? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 109:20–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Achilles N, Mösges R (2013) Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of acute and chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 13:229–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Satdhabudha A, Poachanukoon O (2012) Efficacy of buffered hypertonic saline nasal irrigation in children with symptomatic allergic rhinitis: a randomized double-blind study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:583–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chusakul S, Warathanasin S, Suksangpanya N, Phannaso C, Ruxrungtham S, Snidvongs K et al (2013) Comparison of buffered and nonbuffered nasal saline irrigations in treating allergic rhinitis. Laryngoscope 123:53–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green A, Smallman LA, Logan AC, Drake-Lee AB (1995) The effect of temperature on nasal ciliary beat frequency. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 20:178–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ingels KJ, Kortmann MJ, Nijziel MR, Graamans K, Huizing EH (1991) Factors influencing ciliary beat measurements. Rhinology 29:17–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rabago D, Zgierska A (2009) Saline nasal irrigation for upper respiratory conditions. Am Fam Physician 80:1117–1119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    King D, Mitchell B, Williams CP, Spurling GK (2015) Saline nasal irrigation for acute upper respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006821Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chong LY, Head K, Hopkins C, Philpott C, Glew S, Scadding G et al (2016) Saline irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD011995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kilgour E, Rankin N, Ryan S, Pack R (2004) Mucociliary function deteriorates in the clinical range of inspired air temperature and humidity. Intensive Care Med 30:1491–1494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diesel DA, Lebel JL, Tucker A (1991) Pulmonary particle deposition and airway mucociliary clearance in cold-exposed calves. Am J Vet Res 52:1665–1671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mwimbi XK, Muimo R, Green MW, Mehta A (2003) Making human nasal cilia beat in the cold: a real time assay for cell signalling. Cell Signal 15:395–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nimsakul S, Ruxrungtham S, Chusakul S, Kanjanaumporn J, Aeumjaturapat S, Snidvongs K (2018) Does heating up saline for nasal irrigation improve mucociliary function in chronic rhinosinusitis? Am J Rhinol Allergy 32:106–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyHospital Clínico Universidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations