Performance metrics in mastoidectomy training: a systematic review
- 16 Downloads
To investigate validity evidence, and strengths and limitations of performance metrics in mastoidectomy training.
A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting performance metrics in mastoidectomy/temporal bone surgery were included. Data on design, outcomes, and results were extracted by two reviewers. Validity evidence according to Messick’s framework and level of evidence were assessed.
The search yielded a total of 1085 studies from the years 1947–2018 and 35 studies were included for full data extraction after abstract and full-text screening. 33 different metrics on mastoidectomy performance were identified and ranked according to the number of reports. Most of the 33 metrics identified had some amount of validity evidence. The metrics with most validity evidence were related to drilling time, volume drilled per time, force applied near vital structures, and volume removed.
This review provides an overview of current metrics of mastoidectomy performance, their validity, strengths and limitations, and identifies the gap in validity evidence of some metrics. Evidence-based metrics can be used for performance assessment in temporal bone surgery and for providing integrated and automated feedback in virtual reality simulation training. The use of such metrics in simulation-based mastoidectomy training can potentially address some of the limitations in current temporal bone skill assessment and ease assessment in repeated practice. However, at present, an automated feedback based on metrics in VR simulation does not have sufficient empirical basis and has not been generally accepted for use in training and certification.
Level of evidence
KeywordsSimulation-based training Temporal bone surgery Metrics Objective assessment Automatic evaluation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 4.McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB (2011) Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 86(6):706–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fried MP, Sadoughi B, Gibber MJ, Jacobs JB, Lebowitz RA, Ross DA, Bent JP 3rd, Parikh SR, Sasaki CT, Schaefer SD (2010) From virtual reality to the operating room: the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator experiment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142(2):202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2009.11.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Khemani S, Arora A, Singh A, Tolley N, Darzi A (2012) Objective skills assessment and construct validation of a virtual reality temporal bone simulator. Otology and neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society. Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 33(7):1225–1231. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825e7977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Linke R, Leichtle A, Sheikh F, Schmidt C, Frenzel H, Graefe H, Wollenberg B, Meyer JE (2013) Assessment of skills using a virtual reality temporal bone surgery simulator. Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica: organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale 33 (4):273–281Google Scholar