We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Advertisement

Sensitivity and specificity of stroboscopy in preoperative differentiation of dysplasia from early invasive glottic carcinoma

Abstract

Leukoplakia is a descriptive clinical term designating a white patch or plaque of the mucosa and must be complemented by histology, which can range from simple totally benign keratosis with or without atypia up to invasive carcinoma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of videostroboscopy in preoperative differentiation of early invasive glottic carcinoma from intraepithelial atypia and dysplasia. 46 patients with a total of 60 leukoplakia lesions on the vocal folds were included in the study. Videostroboscopy was used to divide them into two groups based on preservation of the mucosal wave and this was correlated with the final pathology after treatment. The sensitivity and specificity of videostroboscopy in predicting invasive nature of the lesions based on absence or reduction of the mucosal wave were 96.8 and 92.8 %, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 95 %. We suggest that routine application of videostroboscopy can be an important, simple, non-invasive tool, to achieve, in a single procedure, proper and accurate evaluation of glottic leukoplakia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    Frangez I, Gale N, Luzar B (1997) The interpretation of leukoplakia in laryngeal pathology. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 527:142–144

  2. 2.

    Kambic V, Gale N (1995) Epithelial hyperplastic lesions of the larynx. Elsevier Science BV, Amesterdam

  3. 3.

    Peretti G, Piazza C, Berlucchi M, Cappiello M, Nicolai P (2003) Pre- and intraoperative assessment of mid-cord erythroplakias: a prospective study on 52 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 260(10):525–528

  4. 4.

    Peretti G, Cappiello M, Nicolai P, Smussi C, Antonelli AR (1994) Endoscopic laser excisional biopsy for selected glottic carcinomas. Laryngoscope 104(10):1276–1279

  5. 5.

    Simpson B, Rosen C (2008) Vocal fold leukoplakia and hyperkeratosis. Operative techniques in laryngology. Springer, Berlin

  6. 6.

    Hirano M, Bless DM (1993) Videostroboscopic examination of the larynx. Singular Publishing, San Deigo

  7. 7.

    Arens C, Dreyer T, Glanz H, Malzahn K (2004) Indirect autofluorescence laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of laryngeal cancer and its precursor lesions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261(2):71–76

  8. 8.

    Leukoplakia and hyperkeratosis. The Blaine Block Institute for Voice Analysis and Rehabilitation. http://www.bbivar.com/vp_leukoplakia_hyperkeratosis.php. Accessed 22 Sep 2014

  9. 9.

    Brandenburg JH (2001) Laser cordotomy versus radiotherapy: an objective cost analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol laryngol 110(4):312–318

  10. 10.

    Lentsch EJ, Myers JN (2001) New trends in the etiology, diagnosis, and management of laryngeal dysplasia. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 9(2):74–78

  11. 11.

    Wardrop PJ, Sim S, McLaren K (2000) Contact endoscopy of the larynx: a quantitative study. J Laryngo Otol 114(6):437–440

  12. 12.

    Cikojević D, Glunčić I, Pešutić-Pisac V (2008) Comparison of contact endoscopy and frozen section histopathology in the intra-operative diagnosis of laryngeal pathology. J Laryngo Otol 122(8):836–839

  13. 13.

    Gugatschka M, Kiesler K, Beham A, Rechenmacher J, Friedrich G (2008) Hyperplastic epithelial lesions of the vocal folds: combined use of exfoliative cytology and laryngostroboscopy in differential diagnosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265(7):797–801

  14. 14.

    Gamboa J, Echeverría L, Molina B, Cobeta I (2006) Stroboscopic assessment of chronic laryngitis. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 57(6):266–269

  15. 15.

    Colden D, Zeitels SM, Hillman RE, Jarboe J, Bunting G, Spanou N (2001) Stroboscopic assessment of vocal fold keratosis and glottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110(4):293–298

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Correspondence to Ahmed Sweed.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 13064 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MPG 8798 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 13064 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MPG 8798 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Demerdash, A., Fawaz, S.A., Sabri, S.M. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of stroboscopy in preoperative differentiation of dysplasia from early invasive glottic carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 1189–1193 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3530-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Videostroboscopy
  • Leukoplakia
  • Dysplasia
  • Invasive carcinoma