Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 272, Issue 11, pp 3253–3259 | Cite as

Characteristics of the perception for unilateral facial nerve palsy

  • Sue Jean Mun
  • Kyung Tae Park
  • Yoonjoong Kim
  • Joo Hyun Park
  • Young Ho KimEmail author
Otology

Abstract

Patients with facial nerve palsy (FNP) are actually evaluated by other people rather than doctors or the patients themselves. This study was performed to investigate the characteristics of the perception of unilateral FNP in Korean people. A questionnaire using photographs of four patients with four different grades (House-Brackmann) of FNP was given to two hundred people with no FNP. Subjects of each gender, ranging from 20 to 69 years of age, participated. The questionnaire, showing facial expressions of resting, smiling, whistling, eye closing, and frowning, consisted of questions concerning the identification and the involved side of FNP, the unnatural areas of the face, and the unnaturalness of the facial expressions. The overall identification rate of FNP was 75.0 %. The identification rate increased according to the increase in the grade of the patient’s FNP (p < .001). The overall detection rate of the involved side was 54.5 %, and that rate decreased with increasing subject age (p < .001). The area of the most unnatural facial expression was reported to be the mouth, followed by the eyes and cheeks. The most unnatural facial expression was also reported to be smiling, followed by eye closing and whistling. There was no difference in the identification rate of FNP according to education level. However, the overall detection rate of the involved side was higher in the high-education group (p < .001). The detection rate for the involved side of FNP was lower than the rate of identification of FNP and was significantly low in the middle-aged/elderly and low-education level groups.

Keywords

Facial nerve palsy Perception House-Brackmann grade 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Coulson SE, O’Dwyer NJ, Adams RD et al (2004) Expression of emotion and quality of life after facial nerve paralysis. Otol Neurotol 25:1014–1019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryzenman JM, Pensak ML, Tew JM Jr (2005) Facial paralysis and surgical rehabilitation: a quality of life analysis in a cohort of 1,595 patients after acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol 26:516–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93:146–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kang TS, Vrabec JT, Giddings N, Terris DJ (2002) Facial nerve grading systems (1985–2002): beyond the House-Brackmann scale. Otol Neurotol 23:767–771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murty GE, Diver JP, Kelly PJ et al (1994) The Nottingham System: objective assessment of facial nerve function in the clinic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 110:156–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burres S, Fisch U (1986) The comparison of facial grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:755–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ross BR, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM (1994) Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol S180–181Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu WL, Ross B, Nedzelski J (2001) Reliability of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System by novice users. J Otolaryngol 30:208–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bagger-Sjoback D, Remahl S, Ericsson M (2005) Long-term outcome of facial palsy in neuroborreliosis. Otol Neurotol 26:790–795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishii L, Godoy A, Encarnacion CO et al (2012) Not just another face in the crowd: society’s perceptions of facial paralysis. Laryngoscope 122:533–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishii LE, Godoy A, Encarnacion CO et al (2011) What faces reveal: impaired affect display in facial paralysis. Laryngoscope 121:1138–1143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fu L, Bundy C, Sadiq SA (2011) Psychological distress in people with disfigurement from facial palsy. Eye (Lond) 25:1322–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bradbury E (1997) Understanding the Problems. Visibly different: coping with disfigurement. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, p 180Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ikeda M, Nakazato H, Hiroshige K et al (2003) To what extent do evaluations of facial paralysis by physicians coincide with self-evaluations by patients: comparison of the Yanagihara method, the House-Brackmann method, and self-evaluation by patients. Otol Neurotol 24:334–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishii L, Carey J, Byrne P et al (2009) Measuring attentional bias to peripheral facial deformities. Laryngoscope 119:459–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vickery LE, Latchford G, Hewison J et al (2003) The impact of head and neck cancer and facial disfigurement on the quality of life of patients and their partners. Head Neck 25:289–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kecskes G, Jori J, O’Reilly BF et al (2011) Clinical assessment of a new computerised objective method of measuring facial palsy. Clin Otolaryngol 36:313–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neely JG, Joaquin AH, Kohn LA et al (1996) Quantitative assessment of the variation within grades of facial paralysis. Laryngoscope 106:438–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Reilly BF, Soraghan JJ, McGrenary S, He S (2010) Objective method of assessing and presenting the House-Brackmann and regional grades of facial palsy by production of a facogram. Otol Neurotol 31:486–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sargent EW, Fadhli OA, Cohen RS (1998) Measurement of facial movement with computer software. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:313–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pourmomeny AA, Zadmehr H, Hossaini M (2011) Measurement of facial movements with Photoshop software during treatment of facial nerve palsy. J Res Med Sci 16:1313–1318PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sawai N, Hato N, Hakuba N et al (2012) Objective assessment of the severity of unilateral facial palsy using OKAO Vision VR facial image analysis software. Acta Otolaryngol 132:1013–1017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baricich A, Cabrio C, Paggio R et al (2012) Peripheral facial nerve palsy: how effective is rehabilitation? Otol Neurotol 33:1118–1126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keen MS, Burgoyne JD, Kay SL (1993) Surgical management of the paralyzed eyelid. Ear Nose Throat J 72(693):659–701Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yucel OE, Arturk N (2012) Botulinum toxin-A-induced protective ptosis in the treatment of lagophthalmos associated with facial paralysis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr 28:256–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sadiq SA, Khwaja S, Saeed SR (2012) Botulinum toxin to improve lower facial symmetry in facial nerve palsy. Eye (Lond) 26:1431–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sue Jean Mun
    • 1
  • Kyung Tae Park
    • 1
  • Yoonjoong Kim
    • 1
  • Joo Hyun Park
    • 1
  • Young Ho Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologySeoul National University Boramae Medical CenterSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations