European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 272, Issue 9, pp 2183–2190 | Cite as

Sophono Alpha System and subtotal petrosectomy with external auditory canal blind sac closure

  • Giuseppe Magliulo
  • Rosaria Turchetta
  • Giannicola Iannella
  • Riccardo Valpega di Masino
  • Marco de Vincentiis
Otology

Abstract

Recently, a new acoustic device, the so-called Sophono Alpha System, has been introduced into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess Sophono Alpha System hearing aids in ten patients suffering from recurrent chronic middle ear disease who underwent subtotal petrosectomy. Presence of mixed hearing loss with bone conduction thresholds better than or equal to 45 dB was present in each patient. Audiometric tests were performed before and after Sophono implantation and using a conventional bone conduction hearing aid (hearing glasses). Speech audiometry data (speech recognition threshold and word recognition score) were also collected. Speech recognition threshold in dB and percentage of word recognition score at 65 dB were subsequently calculated. After implantation and activation of the Sophono Alpha System, audiological data showed an average air conduction value of 42.1 dB. By comparing this data with the values of air conduction following subtotal petrosectomy, an average acoustic improvement of 29.7 dB could be calculated. The hearing results showed significantly better outcomes of Sophono Alpha System vs. conventional bone conduction aid. Indications to MRI use in patients undergoing Sophono Alpha System implantation are also provided.

Keywords

Sophono Alpha System Subtotal petrosectomy Conductive hearing loss Acoustic device 

References

  1. 1.
    Siegert R (2011) Partially implantable bone conduction hearing aids without a percutaneous abutment (Otomag): technique and preliminary clinical results. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 71:41–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegert R (2010) Magnetic coupling of partially implantable bone conduction hearing aids without open implants. Laryngorhinootologie 89:346–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sophono, Inc. Dutch physicians manual: 1-20Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mulla O, Agada F, Reilly PG (2012) Introducing the Sophono Alpha 1 abutment free bone conduction hearing system. Clin Otolaryngol 37:168–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coker NJ, Jenkins HA, Fisch U (1986) Obliteration of the middle ear and mastoid cleft in subtotal petrosectomy: indications, technique, and results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 95:5–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hol MK, Nelissen RC, Agterberg MJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF (2013) Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant. Otol Neurotol 34:1071–1075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Wolf MJ, Shival ML, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Snik AF (2010) Benefit and quality of life in older bone-anchored hearing aid users. Otol Neurotol 31:766–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gillett D, Fairley JW, Chandrashaker TS, Bean A, Gonzalez J (2006) Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a programme in a district general hospital, assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory. J Laryngol Otol 120:537–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magliulo G, Iannella G, Ciniglio Appiani M, Re M, de Vincentiis M. Subtotal petrosectomy and cerebrospinal fluid leakage in unilateral anacusis. JNLS-B (In press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sanna M, Dispenza F, Flanagan S, De Stefano A, Falcioni M (2008) Management of chronic otitis by middle ear obliteration with blind sac closure of the external auditory canal. Otol Neurotol 29:19–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arunachalam PS, Kilby D, Meikle D, Davison T, Johnson IJ (2001) Bone-anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope 111:1260–1263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McNeill C, Flint D, Fagan P (2004) Conventional behind-the-ear hearing aids after subtotal petrosectomy with blind sac closure. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:926–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dun CA, Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Cremers CW, Hol MK (2011) An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 71:22–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fontaine N, Hemar P, Schultz P, Charpiot A, Debry C (2014) BAHA implant: Implantation technique and complications. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 131:69–74Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hobson JC, Roper AJ, Andrew R, Rothera MP, Hill P, Green KM (2010) Complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. J Laryngol Otol 124:132–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dun CA, Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Hol MK (2012) Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival. Otol Neurotol 33:192–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Linder T, Schlegel C, DeMin N, van der Westhuizen S (2009) Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery. Otol Neurotol 30:41–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Verhaert N, Mojallal H, Schwab B (2013) Indications and outcome of subtotal petrosectomy for active middle ear implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:1243–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ihler F, Köhler S, Meyer AC, Blum J, Strenzke N, Matthias C, Canis M (2014) Mastoid cavity obliteration and vibrant soundbridge implantation for patients with mixed hearing loss. Laryngoscope 124:531–537Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magliulo G, Ronzoni R, Vingolo GM, Cristofari P (1992) Reconstruction of old radical cavities. Am J Otol 13:288–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magliulo G, D’Amico R, Forino M (2001) Reconstruction of the posterior auditory canal with hydroxyapatite-coated titanium. J Otolaryngol 30:330–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kang MK, Ahn JK, Gu TW, Han CS (2009) Epitympanoplasty with mastoid obliteration technique: a long-term study of results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:687–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang X, Chen Y, Liu Q, Han Z, Xu A, Ding Y (2005) Long-term results analysis of mastoidectomy for chronic otitis media. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 19:870–872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee WS, Choi JY, Song MH et al (2005) Mastoid and epitympanic obliteration in canal wall up mastoidectomy for prevention of retraction pocket. Otol Neurotol 26:1107–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gluth MB, Friedman AB, Atcherson SR, Dornhoffer JL (2013) Hearing aid tolerance after revision and obliteration of canal wall down mastoidectomy cavities. Otol Neurotol 34:711–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    George A, Coulson C, Ross E, De R (2012) Single-stage BAHA and mastoid obliteration. Int J Otolaryngol 2012:765271PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Manrique M, Sanhueza I, Manrique R, de Abajo J (2014) A new bone conduction implant: surgical technique and results. Otol Neurotol 35:216–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huber AM, Sim JH, Xie YZ et al (2013) The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device. Hear Res 301:93–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lassaletta L, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Muñoz E, Gavilan J (2014) Retrosigmoid implantation of an active bone conduction stimulator in a patient with chronic otitis media. Auris Nasus Larynx 41:84–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barbara M, Perotti M, Gioia B, Volpini L, Monini S (2013) Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 133:1058–1064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steinmetz C, Mader I, Arndt S et al. (2014) MRI artefacts after Bonebridge implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nospes S, Mann W, Keilmann A (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with magnetic hearing implants: overview and procedural management. Radiologe 53(11):1026–1032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Magliulo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rosaria Turchetta
    • 1
  • Giannicola Iannella
    • 1
  • Riccardo Valpega di Masino
    • 1
  • Marco de Vincentiis
    • 1
  1. 1.Organi di Senso DepartmentUniversity “la Sapienza”RomeItaly
  2. 2.RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations