Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 272, Issue 1, pp 91–95 | Cite as

Day-case septoplasty: a default pathway or is case selection the key?

  • Ali Al-HussainiEmail author
  • Hussein Walijee
  • Anwar Khan
  • Patrick Cuddihy
Rhinology

Abstract

Septoplasty has been identified as suitable for day surgery, but is not commonly performed as such. Guidelines for day surgery stipulate that the unexpected re-admission rate should be 2–3 %; however previous studies have not attained this target. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the surgical and patient factors associated with re-admission following day-case septoplasty. A retrospective case-notes analysis of day-case septoplasties between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2012 was undertaken. Data on patient demographics, surgeon grade and operative technique were examined using a univariate analysis model. A total of 256 septoplasties were performed. 23 patients were admitted, overwhelmingly due to bleeding in the immediate post-operative period, giving an overall admission rate of 9.0 % within the first 24 h. Factors associated with re-admission included the use of intranasal splints (relative risk (RR) 5.34, p < 0.001), the performance of additional operative procedures (RR 4.96, p < 0.001) and surgery on patients with co-morbidities (RR 3.37, p = 0.002). There was no correlation between unexpected admission and patient gender, age, surgeon grade, performance of revision surgery and operative factors including nasal preparation with cocaine, local anaesthetic infiltration, type of incision, number of mucoperichondrial flaps raised, extensive bony dissection, performance of a turbinate procedure, quilting, closure of incision and post-operative packing. Day-case septoplasty in patients with co-morbidities and where additional surgical procedures are performed may be associated with unexpected overnight admission. Thus, safe and efficient day-case septoplasty may not be suitable as a universal default pathway but one where case selection is key.

Keywords

Septoplasty Septal surgery Day-case Admission rate Selection criteria 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Benson-Mitchell R, Kenyon G, Gatland D (1996) Septoplasty as a day-case procedure—a two centre study. J Laryngol Otol 110(2):129–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Daabiss M (2011) American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth 55(2):111–115PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reformGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Department of Health (2002) Day surgery: operational guide: waiting, booking and choiceGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ganesan S, Prior AJ, Rubin JS (2000) Unexpected overnight admissions following day-case surgery: an analysis of a dedicated ENT day care unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82(5):327–330PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Georgalas C, Obholzer R, Martinez-Devesa P, Sandhu G (2006) Day-case septoplasty and unexpected re-admissions at a dedicated day-case unit: a 4-year audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88(2):202–206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hogg RP, Prior MJ, Johnson AP (1999) Admission rates, early readmission rates and patient acceptability of 142 cases of day case septoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24(3):213–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malki D, Quine SM, Pfleiderer AG (1999) Nasal splints, revisited. J Laryngol Otol 113(8):725–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nieminen P, Silvola J, Aust R, Stenfors LE (1997) Nasal septal surgery as an outpatient procedure. J Laryngol Otol 111(11):1034–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1990) Tabular list of the classification of surgical operations and procedures, 4th ednGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paik YS, Renner GJ, Rice GM, Liess BD (2012) “Double-Doyle” intranasal airway splint technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146(4):560–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srinivasan V, Arasaratnam RB, Jankelowitz GA (1995) Day-case septal surgery under general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia with sedation. J Laryngol Otol 109(7):614–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Audit Commission (2001) Acute hospital portfolio—review of national findings: day surgeryGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    The Royal College of Surgeons of England (1992) Commission on the Provision of Surgical Services. Guidelines for day case surgery, revised editionGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Verma R, Alladi R, Jackson I et al (2011) Day case and short stay surgery: 2. Anaesthesia 66:417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    von Schoenberg M, Robinson P, Ryan R (1992) The morbidity from nasal splints in 105 patients. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 17(6):528–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Al-Hussaini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hussein Walijee
    • 1
  • Anwar Khan
    • 1
  • Patrick Cuddihy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryRoyal Gwent HospitalNewportUK

Personalised recommendations