Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic factors of quality of life after transoral laser microsurgery for laryngeal cancer

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate factors influencing quality of life (QOL) after transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) of laryngeal cancer. Four hundred and one consecutive disease-free patients were evaluated 1 year after treatment using the University of Washington-QOL v4, the SF-12 (short form of SF-36), and a questionnaire about self-rated health status. The importance of age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, tumor stage, neck dissection and adjuvant treatment were evaluated. One year after TLM patients had a good QOL, with only 6 % of patients reporting a worsening in their health status. Radiation therapy (p = 0.000) and neck dissection (p = 0.000) were negative factors for disease-specific QOL, whereas age ≥70 (p = 0.01) was a positive independent factor for mental score of SF-12. Speech was negatively influenced by tumor size (p = 0.001) as was swallowing by age (p = 0.001) and postoperative radiation (p = 0.000). Patients treated with TLM present a good QOL 1 year after surgery. Radiation and neck dissection negatively impact QOL. Elderly patients cope better with their disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suárez C, Rodrigo JP, Silver CE, Hartl DM, Takes RP, Rinaldo A, Strojan P, Ferlito A (2012) Laser surgery for early to moderately advanced glottic, supraglottic, and hypopharyngeal cancers. Head Neck 34:1028–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peretti G, Piazza C, Bon FD, Mora R, Grazioli P, Barbieri D, Mangili S, Nicolai P (2013) Function preservation using transoral laser surgery for T2–T3 glottic cancer: oncologic, vocal, and swallowing outcomes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2275–2281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Canis M, Martin A, Ihler F, Wolff HA, Kron M, Matthias C, Steiner W (2013) Transoral laser microsurgery in treatment of pT2 and pT3 glottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma—results of 391 patients. Head Neck. doi:10.1002/hed.23389

    Google Scholar 

  4. Canis M, Martin A, Ihler F, Wolff HA, Kron M, Matthias C, Steiner W (2013) Results of transoral laser microsurgery for supraglottic carcinoma in 277 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2315–2326

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vilaseca I, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Luis Blanch J (2010) Transoral laser microsurgery for T3 laryngeal tumors: prognostic factors. Head Neck 32:929–938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanch JL, Vilaseca I, Caballero M, Moragas M, Berenguer J, Bernal-Sprekelsen M (2011) Outcome of transoral laser microsurgery for T2–T3 tumors growing in the laryngeal anterior commissure. Head Neck 33:1252–1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vilaseca I, Ballesteros F, Martínez-Vidal BM, Lehrer E, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Blanch JL (2013) Quality of life after transoral laser microresection of laryngeal cancer: a longitudinal study. J Surg Oncol 108:52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bindewald J, Oeken J, Wollbrueck D, Wulke C, Dietz A, Herrmann E, Schwarz R, Singer S (2007) Quality of life correlates after surgery for laryngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope 117:1770–1776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ringash J, Bezjak A (2001) A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 23:201–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laraway DC, Rogers SN (2012) A structured review of journal articles reporting outcomes using the University of Washington quality of life scale. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:122–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers SN, Lowe D, Vaughan ED, Brown JS (1998) A comparison of the University of Washington head and neck measure with the SF-36, EORTC C33 and EORTC H&N. Oral Oncol 34:361–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nazar G, Garmendia ML, Royer M, McDowell JA, Weymuller EA Jr, Yueh B (2010) Spanish validation of the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire for head and neck cancer patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143:801–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers SN, O’Donnell JP, Williams-Hewitt S, Christensen JC, Lowe D (2006) Health-related quality of life measured by the UW-QOL—reference values from a general dental practice. Oral Oncol 42:281–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vilaseca I, Huerta P, Blanch JL, Fernández-Planas AM, Jiménez C, Bernal-Sprekelsen M (2008) Voice quality after CO2 laser cordectomy—what can we really expect? Head Neck 30:43–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peretti G, Plazza C, Cocco D, De Benedetto L, Del bon F, De Redaelli Zinis LO et al (2010) Transoral CO2 laser treatment for Tis-T3 glottic cancer: the Brescia experience on 595 patients. Head Neck 32:977–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loughran S, Calder N, Mac Gregor FB, Carding P, MacKenzie K (2005) Quality of life and voice following endoscopic resection or radiotherapy for early glottic cancer. Clin Otolaryngol 30:42–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones AS, Fish B, Fenton JE, Husband DJ (2004) The treatment of early laryngeal cancers (T1–T2 N0): surgery or irradiation? Head Neck 26:127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith JC, Johnson JT, Cognetti DM, Landsittel DP, Gooding WE, Cano ER, Myers EN (2003) Quality of life, functional outcome, and costs of early glottic cancer. Laryngoscope 113:68–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goor KM, Peeters AJ, Mahieu HF et al (2007) Cordectomy by CO2 laser or radiotherapy for small T1a glottic carcinomas: costs, local control, survival, quality of life, and voice quality. Head Neck 29:128–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cragle SP, Brandenburg JH (1993) Laser cordectomy or radiotherapy: cure rates, communication, and cost. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108:648–654

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rydell R, Schalén L, Fex S, Elner A (1995) Voice evaluation before and after laser excision vs. radiotherapy of T1A glottic carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol 115:560–565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krengli M, Policarpo M, Manfredda I, Aluffi P, Gambaro G, Panella M, Pia F (2004) Voice quality after treatment for T1a glottic carcinoma, radiotherapy versus laser cordectomy. Acta Oncol 43:284–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins KM (2011) What treatment for early-stage glottic carcinoma among adult patients: CO2 endolaryngeal laser excision versus standard fractionated external beam radiation is superior in terms of cost utility? Laryngoscope 121:116–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmer AD, Graham MS (2004) The relationship between communication and quality of life in laryngeal speakers. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 28:6–24

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bindewald J, Herrmann E, Dietz A, Wulke C, Meister EF, Wollbrück D, Singer S (2007) Quality of life and voice intelligibility in laryngeal cancer patients; relevance of the “satisfaction paradox”. Laryngorhinootologie 86:426–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eadie TL, Day AM, Sawin DE, Lamvik K, Doyla PC (2013) Auditory-perceptual speech outcomes and quality of life after total laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148:82–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Robertson SM, Yeo JCL, Sabey L, Young D, MacKenzie K (2013) Effects of tumor staging and treatment modality on functional outcome and quality of life after treatment for laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 35(12):1759–1763. doi:10.1002/hed.23230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roh JL, Kim DH, Park CI (2008) Voice, swallowing and quality of life in patients after transoral laser surgery for supraglottic carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 98:184–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peretti G, Piazza C, Cattaneo A, De Benedetto L, Martin E, Nicolai P (2006) Comparison of functional outcomes after endoscopic versus open-neck supraglottic laryngectomies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:827–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cabanillas R, Rodrigo JP, Llorente JL, Suárez V, Ortega P, Suárez C (2004) Functional outcomes of transoral laser surgery of supraglottic carcinoma compared with a transcervical approach. Head Neck 26:653–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Steiner W, Ambrosch P (2000) Laser microsurgery for laryngeal carcinomas. In: Steiner W, Ambrosch P (eds) Endoscopic laser surgery of the upper aerodigestive tract. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scott-Major M, Bumpous JM, Flynn MB, Schill K (2001) Quality of life after treatment for advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. Laryngoscope 111:1379–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Williamson JS, Ingrams D, Jones H (2011) Quality of life after treatment of laryngeal carcinoma: a single centre cross-sectional study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:591–595

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shah S, Har-El G, Rosenfeld RM (2001) Short term and long-term quality of life after neck dissection. Head Neck 23:954–961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Vilaseca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vilaseca, I., Bernal-Sprekelsen, M., Him, R. et al. Prognostic factors of quality of life after transoral laser microsurgery for laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 1203–1210 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3030-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3030-6

Keywords

Navigation